「stl」の検索結果

编写C++通用模板函数，支持std::map和std::unordered_map作为通用容器传入，处理const正确性，支持可选的allocator模板参数，且禁止在函数内部构建临时对象。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up CI/CD pipelines for Flutter apps. Use when configuring automated testing, build, or deployment workflows with GitHub Actions or Fastlane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for writing concise, token-efficient workflow and skill files. Prevents over-building that requires costly optimization passes. Use when creating or editing workflow files, SKILL.md files, or new skill definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive one accepted change through implementation and checks to done, with one fresh review only where a mistake is costly. Use when: selected by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a pre-registered analysis plan with mostly independent steps in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Argues the strongest honest case against a decision, plan, belief, hire, pricing move, strategy, or piece of work the user is leaning toward. Steelmans the other side, ranks at most three objections by consequence, runs a short pre-mortem, credits what the user got right, and ends with what would have to be true for their choice to work. Calibrated and collegial, never combative; says plainly when the position is strong. Use whenever the user says "play devil's advocate", "argue the other side", "poke holes in this", "what am I missing", "am I making a mistake", "talk me out of it", "stress-test this idea", "tell me why this is a bad idea", or asks for pushback on something they have mostly decided. Supports gentle, standard, and hard intensity. Not for interrogating requirements before a build (grill-the-brief) or staging a multi-persona debate (debate-simulator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorously and honestly assess a NEW or proposed covariance / correlation / precision estimator, or a new covariance scoring rule, using precise. Use when someone proposes, asks to evaluate, or wants to compare a covariance methodology. Covers implementing it to the contract, conformance, benchmarking against the registry, out-of-sample validation, and statistically defensible inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress-Cache-Retrieve for huge, repetitive array tool output (logs, scan results, time series, event streams) before it enters context. Keeps an informative sample — endpoints, anomalies/change-points, head/tail — drops the redundant rest to a local cache, and leaves a retrievable hash. Use when a tool returns a long uniform JSON array you must read but mostly skim, and the full set is one command away if needed. Lossy-but-recoverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Carry out a released charter to a proven result: plan only as much as the work needs, do the work through the project's own workers, prove every success check with a recorded real run, get one independent review, and close honestly. Invoke explicitly as `$deliver <charter>` (Codex) or `/deliver <charter>` (Claude, Cursor), or the way your agent invokes a skill, or when a dispatch names you the executor of a charter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover content from "dead" CDNs where DNS no longer resolves but servers still respond. Use when: (1) A service shut down but you have URLs to their CDN, (2) DNS lookups fail but you suspect the CDN provider (Fastly, CloudFront, Akamai) still has the content, (3) Archiving content from defunct services like Vine, Tumblr, etc. The key insight: CDN providers often keep serving content long after DNS dies - hit the IP directly with the original Host header.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to automate capture of marketing screenshots for a SwiftUI iOS app across multiple locales, devices, or appearances. Covers full-screen shots, isolated element renders (carousel cards, widgets), and reproducible output naming. Triggers on marketing screenshots, locale screenshots, widget renders, App Store assets, fastlane-alternative, simctl screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sync, validate, and apply App Store metadata with the current asc canonical metadata workflow. Use when updating metadata, localizations, keywords, or migrating legacy fastlane metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end 3D printing for Bambu Lab printers. Finds models online (MakerWorld, Printables), generates them with AI (text-to-3D, image-to-3D) or as exact-dimension parametric CAD, checks and repairs printability, converts textures to AMS multi-color, renders previews, opens them in Bambu Studio for the user to print, and reads printer status, AMS filaments and print progress. Use this whenever the user wants to 3D print something, design or model an object for printing, work with STL/3MF/OBJ/GLB files for a printer, check on a Bambu Lab printer (A1, A1 Mini, A2L, P1S, P2S, X1C, X1E, X2D, H2C, H2S, H2D, H2D Pro), or asks about AMS filament, slicing or print progress, even if they don't say "Bambu".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Physicist judgment. Reasons from Hilbert-space domains, Wightman/OS and Haag–Kastler axioms, constructive QFT, Gibbs measures, and spectral/scattering theory; uses Reed–Simon, Glimm–Jaffe, MathSciNet/math-ph, while treating wrong self-adjoint extensions, invalid Wick rotation, limit-order swaps, and lattice-as-continuum claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Gravitational Physicist. Use when a task calls for Gravitational Physicist judgment. Reasons from calibrated strain, colored non-stationary noise PSDs, matched-filter SNR, and Bayesian posteriors through PyCBC/GstLAL/cWB searches, Bilby/LALInference PE with NRSur/SEOBNR/IMRPhenom waveforms, and FAR/p_astro significance while treating glitch contamination, waveform-approximant mismatch, mass-spin and distance-inclination degeneracies, and unmodeled selection effects as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce 3D assets with Tripo (tripo3d.ai / Tripo AI by VAST) through its OpenAPI and Studio platform — text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and multiview-to-3D generation; PBR texturing; auto-rigging and preset animation; retopology/low-poly and quad remesh; format conversion (GLB/FBX/OBJ/USDZ/STL/3MF) and engine import (Unity/Unreal/Blender/3D printing). Use when an agent must drive the async task-based Tripo API (create task, poll or webhook, download), choose a model version (v3.0 / v3.1 / P1), write prompts or prepare input images, control mesh/texture parameters, estimate credits and respect rate limits, review generated mesh quality (topology, UVs, poly count, texture fidelity), run iteration and repair workflows, or reason about the rights/licensing of Tripo-generated assets. Trigger on requests to generate, texture, rig, animate, retopologize, convert, or evaluate a 3D model with Tripo, or to integrate the Tripo API into a pipeline. Not for choosing a 3D renderer, editing meshes by hand, or non-Tripo generators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce 3D assets with Meshy (meshy.ai) through its REST API and web platform — text-to-3D, image-to-3D, multi-image-to-3D, AI texturing/PBR, remesh/topology control, UV, and auto-rigging/animation. Use this skill when an agent must generate a mesh from a prompt or reference image, control polygon count and topology, apply or restyle textures, rig a humanoid for animation, export to GLB/FBX/OBJ/USDZ/STL for Unity/Unreal/Blender, drive Meshy's asynchronous job API (auth, polling, streaming, webhooks, credits, rate limits), review generated meshes for game/film/print readiness, or decide whether Meshy is the right tool at all. Not for editing an existing hand-modeled asset's geometry, hard-surface CAD with exact dimensions, or guaranteed-watertight manufacturing parts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to automate capture of marketing screenshots for a SwiftUI iOS app across multiple locales, devices, or appearances. Covers full-screen shots, isolated element renders (carousel cards, widgets), and reproducible output naming. Triggers on marketing screenshots, locale screenshots, widget renders, App Store assets, fastlane-alternative, simctl screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile this identity with the relay — republish keys, replenish one-time keys, rotate the fallback, and resend unacknowledged mail. Use to retry stuck sends, recover after a relay reset, or on a timer/cron for a mostly-listening agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Warren Buffett said he looks for "economic castles protected by unbreachable moats." A moat is a sustainable competitive advantage that protects your business from competitors. Without a moat, success attracts competition that erodes your margins to zero. This skill covers identifying, building, and deepening moats. Network effects, switching costs, brand, scale economies, and the rarer moats like regulatory capture and counter-positioning. Use when "moat, defensibility, competitive advantage, network effects, switching costs, barrier to entry, unfair advantage, protect from competition, sustainable advantage, winner take all, flywheel, lock-in, moat, defensibility, strategy, network-effects, switching-costs, competitive-advantage, seven-powers" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Professional LaTeX formatting, strategic analysis frameworks (Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, BCG Matrix), and deep research integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mid-conversation reflection skill that pauses execution and zooms out from detail-mode to honestly reassess direction, assumptions, and bias. Use when the user says 'reflect', 'take a step back', 'step back', 'zoom out', 'are we missing something', 'bigger picture', 'sanity check this', 'are we on track', 'are we overthinking this', 'forest for the trees', or any variation signaling intent to break out of detail-mode and reassess. Also trigger when the conversation has gone deep on implementation details without strategic check-in, or when the user shows signs of being stuck — that's often a signal the framing needs a reset, not more detail work. Intentionally low-intake: runs the 5-dimension analysis immediately when prior context is rich enough; asks one forcing clarifier only when invocation context is too thin to reassess from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。