「tdd」の検索結果

Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドメインモデル中心の開発手順ガイド。テストファーストでドメインモデルを設計・実装し、 インメモリリポジトリ→ユースケース→インフラの順で開発を進める手法を解説。 トリガー：「ドメインモデルから始めたい」「TDDでDDD」「インメモリリポジトリの作り方」 「ユースケースのテスト方法」「DDD開発の進め方」等の開発プロセス関連リクエストで起動。

Kotlin/Compose/Hilt/coroutine test code patterns: fakes, MainDispatcherRule, Turbine, Roborazzi, golden-contract calls. Use when writing or fixing Kotlin test code. Not for the TDD workflow (use tdd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive development with a red-green-refactor TDD cycle, ensuring tests are written before implementation. Use when implementing any new functionality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing strategies and methodologies including TDD and E2E testing. Use when writing tests, implementing TDD workflow, or setting up E2E test infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canon TDD for humans and AI agents. Use for production code changes by writing tests first, proving RED, implementing minimal GREEN, and refactoring safely. 2026 edition adds TDP, flakiness gate, ralph-loop integration, memory-search in Step 0, PBT as Step 5.5, mutation testing gate in Step 4, and CJS LSP warning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RED-GREEN-MUTATE-KILL MUTANTS-REFACTOR workflow for writing production code. Use before ANY production code change - new features, bug fixes, or behavior changes. Triggers on starting implementation work of any kind. Covers the cycle itself - failing test first, minimum code to pass, mutation verification, refactor assessment. For how to write good tests, see testing. For the refactoring step in detail, see refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive testing skill covering unit, integration, and e2e testing with TDD. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or setting up testing infrastructure. Keywords: test, TDD, unit test, integration, e2e, coverage, mock, jest, vitest

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `tdd-guide` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strict red-green-refactor TDD workflow for implementing features, fixing bugs, or changing behavior in Rails applications. Enforces the discipline of writing a failing test before any production code. Use whenever you want to implement with TDD — whether a new feature, a bugfix, a refactor, or any behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全重构代码技能。当用户明确提到"重构"、"代码异味"或需要在TDD循环的Refactor阶段改进代码内部结构时使用。 **仅在以下场景触发**： - 用户明确说"重构这段代码" - 提到"代码异味"并要求改进 - TDD循环中的Refactor阶段 - 代码审查中需要改进内部结构但不改变功能 **注意**：如果用户只是说"优化"、"改进"或"提升性能"，不应该触发此技能，除非明确提到"重构"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides expert-level guidance for Test-Driven Development (TDD) in VS Code extension development following t-wada methodology. Use when writing tests before implementation, creating comprehensive test suites, implementing Red-Green-Refactor cycles, or improving test coverage for extension components like WebViews, terminal managers, and activation logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementer - fetches a GitHub issue, builds an implementation plan, then implements using TDD. Use when: implement, build this, code this, add this feature, TDD, test first, red green refactor, pick a task, next task, dev.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于实现新前端行为、修复 bug 或重构可先由测试描述预期行为的逻辑。适用于组件、hooks/composables、工具函数、API clients、路由守卫或用户工作流；中文触发词包括 TDD、测试驱动、先写测试、红绿重构、回归测试。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when completing a TDD step and wanting a quality check. Reviews test quality after RED, implementation correctness after GREEN, and scenario completeness after REFACTOR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE for ANY work on .py .pyi .rs .ts .tsx .mts .cts .go files. One philosophy: strict types, modern stacks (Pydantic v2 / serde+thiserror / Zod / gin+sqlc+pgx+slog), modern toolchains (uv+basedpyright+ruff / cargo+clippy+miri / Bun+Biome+tsc / gofumpt+golangci-lint v2+nilaway+go-race), parse-don't-validate, exhaustive match, typed errors, no any/unwrap/panic, 250 LOC ceiling, TDD. Routes to references/{python,rust,typescript,rust-ub,go}/. Triggers: write/edit Python/Rust/TypeScript/Go code, new project, gin server, bubbletea TUI, CJK IME, connect-go RPC, sqlc pgx, branded ids, exhaustive match, unsafe Rust, miri, oversized file, refactor, TDD, e2e test, arena, allocator, bumpalo, const fn, const generics, comptime, zero-alloc, bitfield, repr, scopeguard, errdefer, Zig-like, zerocopy, packed struct.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factory_boy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with a red-green-clean loop, running mix credo on the whole project at the end of every vertical slice so standards violations are fixed in the slice that introduced them instead of piling into a refactor at the end. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。