「termine」の検索結果

How to determine which backlog backend a project is configured to use, and what to do with the answer. Use when about to call a backend-specific tool, choosing between a GitHub-only and a Beads-native operation, or reporting which store a result came from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and configure the GitHub CLI (gh) for AI agent environments where gh may not be pre-installed and git remotes use local proxies instead of github.com. Use when gh command not found, shutil.which returns None, need GitHub API access for issues or PRs or releases or workflow runs, or repository operations fail with 'failed to determine base repo' error. Provides auto-install script with SHA256 verification, GITHUB_TOKEN auth with anonymous fallback, and the required -R flag pattern for proxy environments. Covers project management via GitHub Projects V2, milestones via REST API, issue lifecycle templates, and label taxonomy management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine commit message for staged Git changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine the conceptual proximity of a topic -- its parent topic, its most relevant sibling topics, and its most relevant child topics -- optionally grounded in Internet/Web facts and optionally navigable in an interactive loop. Use when the user wants to explore the conceptual neighborhood of a topic, or mentions "proximity" or "related topics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision framework for agents to determine WHEN and WHETHER to use Claude Code's native cron scheduler (CronCreate/CronList/CronDelete) vs OS cron, GitHub Actions, or simple Task() delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically interpret mass spectra to determine molecular formula, identify fragmentation pathways, and propose molecular structures. Covers ionization method assessment, molecular ion identification, isotope pattern analysis, common fragmentation losses, and purity evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze magnetic levitation systems by applying Earnshaw's theorem to determine whether passive static levitation is possible, then identifying the appropriate circumvention mechanism (diamagnetic, superconducting, active feedback, or spin-stabilized). Use when evaluating maglev transport, magnetic bearings, superconducting levitation, diamagnetic suspension, or Levitron-type devices. Covers force balance calculations, stability analysis in all spatial and tilting modes, and Meissner effect versus flux pinning distinctions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit one bounded Proto UI collaboration-governance slice and route policy-determined drift toward reversible correction. Use across Issues, pull requests, Discussions, labels, milestones, Project, rules, permissions, or Actions. This evidence leaf is read-only; authorized corrections continue in their registered leaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract comprehensive site specifications from simple descriptions. Use when analyzing a user's theme request to determine site type, audience, tone, layout requirements, and typography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an assistant's own closing line left in the document), to compare documents for overlap, or mentions signs-of-ai / SignsOfAI. Backed by the SignsOfAI engine — for a measured 0–100 score, sentence-rhythm burstiness, originality, citations, a writer baseline or perplexity, hand off to that engine (web app, CLI or MCP server) as described below. It cannot determine who wrote a text and must never imply that it can.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Main application building orchestrator. Creates full-stack applications from natural language requests. Determines project type, selects tech stack, coordinates agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Memory is the cornerstone of intelligent agents. Without it, every interaction starts from zero. This skill covers the architecture of agent memory: short-term (context window), long-term (vector stores), and the cognitive architectures that organize them. Key insight: Memory isn't just storage - it's retrieval. A million stored facts mean nothing if you can't find the right one. Chunking, embedding, and retrieval strategies determine whether your agent remembers or forgets. The field is fragm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when mapping audit targets to appropriate config or domain agents. Analyzes file types, patterns, and content to determine which agents should audit each file/target. Returns agents[] needed for audit workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates phishing email incidents from initial user report through header analysis, URL/attachment detonation, impacted user identification, and containment actions using SOC tools like Splunk, Microsoft Defender, and sandbox analysis platforms. Use when a reported phishing email requires full incident investigation to determine scope and impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984) and the Mitchell et al. (1997) salience model to identify, classify, and prioritize stakeholders based on power, legitimacy, and urgency. Use this skill when the user needs to map stakeholders for a project or strategy, determine which stakeholders demand immediate attention, balance competing stakeholder interests, or when they ask 'who are our key stakeholders', 'how do we prioritize conflicting demands', or 'which stakeholders can block this initiative'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Resource-Based View (Barney, 1991) and VRIO framework to evaluate whether a firm's resources and capabilities confer sustained competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to assess internal resources for strategic value, determine if a competitive edge is sustainable, audit resource portfolios for VRIO criteria, or when they ask 'what makes our advantage sustainable', 'which resources matter most', or 'can competitors replicate this'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss) to build theory inductively from qualitative data through open, axial, and selective coding. Use this skill when the user needs to develop new theory from data rather than test existing hypotheses, conduct theoretical sampling and constant comparison, determine when theoretical saturation is reached, or when they ask 'what theory explains this phenomenon', 'how do I code qualitative data systematically', or 'when do I stop collecting data'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Efficient Market Hypothesis (Fama, 1970) to evaluate information incorporation in asset prices across weak, semi-strong, and strong forms. Use this skill when the user needs to assess market efficiency, determine if a trading strategy can generate abnormal returns, evaluate event studies, or when they ask 'can technical analysis work', 'does the market already know this', or 'is this anomaly exploitable'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。