「trust」の検索結果

Review trust before frontend tooling adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estate Planning & Legacy Protection for the Owens family. Tracks wills, trusts, beneficiary designations, life insurance, survivor benefits, and powers of attorney. Ensures Lindsey and the kids are protected if something happens to Tory. Triggers on: "Estate plan", "Will", "Life insurance", "Beneficiaries", "What happens if", "Legacy", "Survivor benefits", "Power of attorney", "Trust", "Estate check", "Beneficiary audit", "SGLI", "FSGLI", "Dependent education", "Chapter 35". The only estate plan that fails worse than a bad one is no plan at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispute resolution, forensic investigation, and risk assessment for autonomous AI agent transactions. Reconstruct provenance chains, adjudicate fault, generate actuarial risk profiles for agent insurance. The accountability layer of the Agent Trust Stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix .NET HTTPS dev certificate trust issues on Linux. Covers the full certificate lifecycle from generation to system CA bundle inclusion, with distro-specific guidance for Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and WSL2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skeptical analysis and critique of claims, plans, and code without taking anyone at face value. Use when the user says "don't trust me", wants adversarial review, red-teaming, assumption checking, or verification that generated or proposed code is actually correct. Triggers on skepticism, critique everything, verify claims, challenge assumptions, red team, devil's advocate, prove it, smell test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review other contributors' PRs to learn the codebase and build maintainer trust. Guides structured diff reading, helps formulate review comments, and teaches how to distinguish blocking issues from nits. Use when you want to learn a codebase by reviewing PRs, build trust with maintainers before contributing code, or practice code review on OSS repos. Not for reviewing your own PR — use oss-submit-pr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Linux credential artifacts, service tokens, SSH material, cloud and container secrets, socket-level trust, and host-to-host pivot chains. Use when the user asks to trace Linux auth artifacts, accepted token or key replay, socket or service-account trust edges, sudo or capability abuse, or explain lateral movement across Linux challenge nodes. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos delegation, SPN trust edges, S4U abuse, RBCD, constrained or unconstrained delegation, and service-ticket acceptance. Use when the user asks about constrained delegation, unconstrained delegation, RBCD, S4U, SPNs, ticket acceptance, or how a Kerberos trust edge turns into effective privilege under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD pipeline and software-supply-chain exploitation: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Azure DevOps, Gitea/Forgejo, self-hosted runners/agents, poisoned pipeline execution, artifact/cache abuse, dependency confusion, third-party Action trust, GitOps/registry poisoning, workload identity/OIDC, and emerging agentic CI/CD. Use this skill when the operator has access to a CI/CD system, source repository, build/deploy configuration, runner/agent, artifact/package/registry path, or software delivery trust chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a trusted bug or performance report needs reproduction and fix. Not for untrusted reports or scope beyond the named feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Playwright automation failures against code-server (VS Code in browser). Use when: (1) trust dialog blocks all clicks — "monaco-dialog-modal-block intercepts pointer events", (2) button:has-text() finds wrong buttons behind modal dialog, (3) keyboard shortcuts don't work — Meta vs Control inconsistency, (4) VS Code extension activity bar icon not found by aria-label, (5) panels show placeholder text despite extension being "Connected". Covers trust dialog dismissal, keyboard shortcut hybrid mode, extension panel selectors, and database connection verification for Grafema extension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply social capital theory (Putnam, Coleman, Bourdieu, Burt) to analyze how network structures and trust generate value or impose constraints. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate bridging vs bonding capital, identify structural holes or network closure benefits, assess community or organizational trust dynamics, or when they ask 'how does our network create value', 'are we too insular', or 'where are the structural holes we can exploit'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal, security, privacy, and deliverability requirements every delivered app must satisfy — legal pages, PII/deletion rights, CSP/Trusted-Types/Zod, AI-agent security, RFC7807 errors, email domain auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or reviewing code that parses user input, builds SQL/shell commands, handles secrets/credentials, hashes passwords, changes auth checks, deserializes untrusted data, or constructs paths/URLs from input

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dry-run Trust Magnitude for proposed named skills or suites before curation. Use when deciding whether a proposed suite deserves A/S treatment, when checking Fusion Score structural inputs, when comparing repo stars vs suite component counts, or when asked to appraise a candidate before adding it to the registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, inspect, plan, apply, remove, pack, and scaffold local Pulp package manifests. Use for Pulp-native source/UI/template kits and for untrusted or semi-trusted manifest-bearing artifacts that must be reviewed before project mutation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone E-E-A-T scoring rubric for a URL or content draft. Scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust 0-5 each using concrete detectable signals, framed per Google's creating-helpful-content doc. Use when user says "E-E-A-T", "EEAT", "experience expertise", "trust signals", or "author authority".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when designing, auditing, or troubleshooting behavioral boundaries for Agentforce agents — including topic (now subagent) Scope fields, agent-level system instructions, topic/action filters, the Escalation topic, restricted topics, and Instruction Adherence monitoring. Trigger keywords: agent guardrails, agent out of scope, restrict agent behavior, topic scope, subagent scope, agent fallback, Escalation topic, abuse prevention, action filters. NOT for Trust Layer content filtering (Einstein Trust Layer is a separate product concern), NOT for general topic routing design (use agentforce/agent-topic-design), NOT for prompt template construction (use agentforce/prompt-builder-templates).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redact PII in your own code before it reaches Agentforce prompts, models, and logs. Trigger keywords: agentforce pii, pii redaction, data masking llm, prompt pii filter, audit pii leakage. NOT for turning on the platform's own masking, zero-retention and audit-trail controls — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer. NOT for masking PII in a refreshed sandbox — use security/sandbox-data-masking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when monitoring Agentforce agent sessions, analyzing conversation logs, measuring deflection rates, or diagnosing agent performance issues. Triggers: 'agentforce session analytics', 'how to query agent conversation data', 'monitor agentforce agent effectiveness', 'agent deflection rate', 'utterance analysis agentforce'. NOT for Trust Layer audit logging — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer. NOT for designing the topic boundaries and guardrails that cause the misrouting you are seeing in the data — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open, classify, and escalate support cases with Salesforce Technical Support via the Help portal: choosing severity, engaging Premier Success, the Escalate to Technical Support Management path, tracking incidents on the Trust site. NOT for escalating your own org's cases after N hours - use admin/escalation-rules. NOT for SLA milestone timers and entitlement processes - use admin/entitlements-and-milestones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。