1,391 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
UI and UX reconnaissance — scan existing frontend routes, components, navigation, and flows to understand the current UX state before designing. Use when asked to "understand the current UI", "what UX patterns exist", "map the navigation", "what screens exist", or before starting any flow or wireframe work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pragmatics and communicative competence across languages -- speech acts (Austin/Searle), Grice's conversational maxims and implicature, politeness theory (Brown & Levinson), face-threatening acts, discourse structure, turn-taking, repair strategies, register and formality, cross-cultural communication, communicative strategies (circumlocution, approximation, appeal for assistance), and the gap between grammatical competence and communicative performance. Use when teaching communication skills, analyzing cross-cultural misunderstandings, building conversational fluency, or understanding why grammatically correct sentences can be pragmatically inappropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
See, Understand, Act on video and audio. See- ingest from local files, URLs, RTSP/live feeds, or live record desktop; return realtime context and playable stream links. Understand- extract frames, build visual/semantic/temporal indexes, and search moments with timestamps and auto-clips. Act- transcode and normalize (codec, fps, resolution, aspect ratio), perform timeline edits (subtitles, text/image overlays, branding, audio overlays, dubbing, translation), generate media assets (image, audio, video), and create real time alerts for events from live streams or desktop capture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand implementation details of .NET code by decompiling assemblies. Use when you want to see how a .NET API works internally, inspect NuGet package source, view framework implementation, or understand compiled .NET binaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to deeply understand their ideal customer before writing copy — pains, desires, inner monologue, and language. Also use when the user mentions "empathy engine", "know your target", "customer pain points", or asks to research their audience before writing Blitz Copy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for any marketing research, product positioning, copywriting research, or audience profiling task. Triggers include: "research my product", "develop my value proposition", "profile my avatar", "understand my market", "create a unique mechanism", "market awareness", "market sophistication", "ideal customer profile", "ICP research", "positioning research", "copywriting research", "features and benefits", "competitor research", "competitive analysis", or any request to deeply research a product or audience for marketing purposes. Use this skill proactively whenever a user wants to prepare materials for sales copy, landing pages, ads, email sequences, or any persuasion-focused content. If a user says "help me understand my market", "I need to figure out my messaging", "who is my customer", or "what makes my product different", this skill applies immediately.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CORE learning workflow — use this whenever the user has a source note open (paper, post, book, lecture, course, clipping) and wants to extract knowledge, understand what they just read, or build it into their vault. Triggers on "process this note", "process this paper", "extract concepts", "what can I learn from this", "atomize this", "add this to my vault", "what's important here", or when the user shares a note and asks for help understanding it. Do NOT wait for an explicit /process command — if the user is engaging with a source note and wants to go deeper, this skill applies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person in systematic observation of systems, patterns, or phenomena. AI coaches neutral attention, field notes methodology, pattern recognition, hypothesis formation, and structured reporting for debugging, research, and system understanding. Use when a person wants to understand a system's behavior before intervening, when someone keeps jumping to conclusions and needs the discipline of observation first, when preparing an evidence-based report, or when studying team dynamics or process effectiveness through direct observation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep receptive attention to extract intent beyond literal words. Maps active listening from counseling psychology to AI reasoning: clearing assumptions, attending to full signal, parsing multiple layers (literal, procedural, emotional, contextual, constraint, meta), reflecting understanding, noticing what is unsaid, and integrating the whole picture. Use when a user's request feels ambiguous, when context suggests something different from the literal words, when previous responses have missed the mark, or before beginning a large task where misunderstanding intent would waste significant effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Communicate an integrated insight in a way that is accessible, actionable, and preserves the multi-domain nature of the understanding. Integrated insights are multi-dimensional — linearizing them risks losing the relationships that make them valuable. This skill provides a structured procedure for choosing the right form, expressing the gestalt with honest attribution, and inviting productive challenge. Use after integrate-gestalt has formed a cross-domain understanding that needs to be communicated to an audience — domain specialists, generalists, or decision-makers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process and generate multimedia content using Google Gemini API. Capabilities include analyze audio files (transcription with timestamps, summarization, speech understanding, music/sound analysis up to 9.5 hours), understand images (captioning, object detection, OCR, visual Q&A, segmentation), process videos (scene detection, Q&A, temporal analysis, YouTube URLs, up to 6 hours), extract from documents (PDF tables, forms, charts, diagrams, multi-page), generate images (text-to-image, editing, composition, refinement). Use when working with audio/video files, analyzing images or screenshots, processing PDF documents, extracting structured data from media, creating images from text prompts, or implementing multimodal AI features. Supports multiple models (Gemini 2.5/2.0) with context windows up to 2M tokens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reverse engineers malware binaries using NSA's Ghidra disassembler and decompiler to understand internal logic, cryptographic routines, C2 protocols, and evasion techniques at the assembly and pseudo-C level. Activates for requests involving malware reverse engineering, disassembly analysis, decompilation, binary analysis, or understanding malware internals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Weick's sensemaking theory to analyze how individuals and organizations construct meaning from ambiguous situations. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze organizational responses to crises, understand how interpretive frames shape action, diagnose breakdowns in collective understanding, or when they ask 'how did they interpret this situation', 'why did the organization fail to see the warning signs', or 'how do people make sense of disruption'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains complex code through clear narratives, visual diagrams, and step-by-step breakdowns. Use when user asks to explain code, understand algorithms, analyze design patterns, wants code walkthroughs, or mentions "explain this code", "how does this work", "code breakdown", or "understand this function".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run exploratory data analysis on a dataset and produce a structured report. Use when the user says "explore this dataset", "EDA on X", "analyze this data", "what's in this dataset", "summarize this data", "first look at the data", "understand this dataset before modeling", "data quality check", "describe this dataframe", or wants to understand a new dataset before building models or dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Understand before implementing. USE FOR: any task where the agent might rush to code — forces understanding WHY/WHAT FOR/FOR WHOM before defining a solution, activates planning and reasoning discipline, prevents technical debt from shallow requests. Use to validate intent, plan before coding, reason before acting, challenge assumptions, prevent premature implementation. DO NOT USE FOR: deep multi-technology analysis (use contextação), persisting decisions across tasks (use task-map).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in Japanese honorific language covering 尊敬語・謙譲語・丁寧語 with deep understanding of situational usage, business contexts, and cultural nuances
Use this skill when the user is working with an Aspire distributed application and needs to operate the AppHost or its resources through the Aspire CLI: start, restart, stop, or wait on the app; inspect resources, logs, traces, docs, or health; add integrations; manage secrets or config; publish, deploy, or rerun a named pipeline step; initialize Aspire in an existing app; recover missing `.modules` files in a TypeScript AppHost; discover the right frontend URL for Playwright from Aspire state; expose custom dashboard/resource commands; or understand unfamiliar Aspire AppHost APIs in C# or TypeScript. Use it even if they describe the task in terms of an AppHost, resources, dashboard, existing app bootstrap, missing generated modules, Playwright URL discovery, C# API understanding, or local distributed app workflow without explicitly naming Aspire. Do not use it for non-Aspire .NET apps, container-only repos with no AppHost, or ordinary build and test tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。