「writing」の検索結果

Korean and French screenwriting practice (韩国/法国编剧方法) — from the international masterclass; Oh Seung-uk (Christmas in August, The Shameless; field research in disguise, "write the emotion", first act and last act first, spaces as skeleton, reading to hostile listeners, surviving producers), Choi Seok-hwan (King and the Clown; genre as promise to the audience, "story = deepening crisis + intensifying desire", two reversals and bittersweet endings, the producer/director/writer trio), and Frédéric Auburtin (Paris je t'aime; dialogue last, Italian-style table reads, "12 lines not 13", dignity for characters, originals born from commissions, editing by emotion). Use when working in a Korean-style commercial drama or genre film, a French auteur/commission context, when planning field research, when a producer relationship is the problem, or when you need the Korean "three live together" development model or the French "emotion first, structure second" editing approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Case studies of television series writing (剧集案例库) from primary texts; Sorkin's six West Wing teleplays (act-page tables, eight act-out types); Chase's five Sopranos scripts (the 35-beat A/B/C/D recipe, what a pilot refuses to explain); Fellowes's annotated Downton Abbey season two (19 storylines, 419 footnotes); Waller-Bridge's Fleabag Scriptures (the six-episode half-hour template); Calvisi's eight minute-by-minute pilot beat sheets (Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Game of Thrones and more); Landau's 47-series structure appendix; Miller's Hannibal and HTGAWM breakdowns; Goldberg & Rabkin's beat sheets; Sakamoto Yuji's We Made a Beautiful Bouquet (a feature) and Noh Hee-kyung's The Most Beautiful Goodbye. Use when you want a worked example of how an episode or pilot is built, need real act lengths, scene counts or storyline grids to imitate, are breaking a multi-thread ensemble episode, designing a bottle episode or a finale, writing a relationship or family drama, or ask 某一集是怎么写的 / 这部剧的结构表.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The screenwriting business and career (编剧行业与生意经) — merged from Diamond & Weissman's Bulletproof (buyer's-eye workflow, three Cs, one-page nine-step, set pieces, submission, notes, resilience), Eric Bork's The Idea (PROBLEM seven-element idea test, 60/30/10, television differences), Neill Hicks (market four entities, six criteria, WGA, agents, option, credit arbitration, gross vs net, step deals), Richard Walter (query letter, agents, package, option, spec, release, copyright, guild, gatekeepers, professionalism, 66 principles), Wendy Henson (breaking in), Blake Snyder (logline pitch, genre, agents), Julian Hoxter (industry terms), Mei Feng's Oscar analyses, and the Hollywood masterclass (pitching, notes, credits, TV vs film). Use when evaluating whether an idea is sellable, writing a logline/query/pitch, preparing a submission, handling notes and rewrites, understanding options/credits/WGA/agents/net profit, choosing between film and TV, or building a career strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. Invoke it on your own initiative the moment you finish writing, editing, or refactoring non-trivial production code, before presenting or committing — don't wait to be asked. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "review writing", "check documentation style", "audit interface copy", or "apply writing guidelines".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or improve MATLAB help text (documentation comments) for a function, class, or script file following MathWorks standards (H1 line, syntax paragraphs, See Also, 75-char lines). Read BEFORE writing MATLAB help — default patterns (Inputs:/Outputs: lists, block comments, uppercase See Also) produce non-conforming output. Use when writing, rewriting, fixing, or reviewing MATLAB help comments or function documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

New Zealand business English writing style for professional communications — warm, inclusive, EN-NZ spelling (colour, organise, centre). Use whenever the user is writing for a New Zealand audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

American business English writing style for professional communications — direct, action-oriented, EN-US spelling (color, organize, center). Use whenever the user is writing for an American audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

British business English writing style for professional communications — polished, understated, EN-GB spelling (colour, organise, centre). Use whenever the user is writing for a British audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Australian business English for professional writing — warm, direct, EN-AU spelling (colour, organise, centre), no filler words. Use whenever the user is writing for an Australian audience: emails, chat messages, proposals, client communications, blog posts, web copy, or any business writing. Apply to drafting, editing, and tone-checking professional text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, and improve blog posts for the Sentry engineering blog following Sentry's specific writing standards, voice, and quality bar. Use this skill whenever someone asks to write a blog post, draft a technical article, review blog content, improve a draft, write a product announcement, create an engineering deep-dive, or produce any written content destined for the Sentry blog or developer audience. Also trigger when the user mentions "blog post," "blog draft," "write-up," "announcement post," "engineering post," "deep dive," "postmortem," or asks for help with technical writing for Sentry. Even if the user just says "help me write about [feature/topic]" — if it sounds like it could become a Sentry blog post, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when the user mentions "content strategy," "what should I write about," "content ideas," "blog strategy," "topic clusters," "content planning," "editorial calendar," "content marketing," "content roadmap," "what content should I create," "blog topics," "content pillars," or "I don't know what to write." Use this whenever someone needs help deciding what content to produce, not just writing it. For writing individual pieces, see copywriting. For SEO-specific audits, see seo-audit. For social media content specifically, see social.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a writing scaffold teaching the genre conventions specific to an academic discipline. Use when students write lab reports, historical essays, or other discipline-specific text types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interface copy that works — voice/tone, the PACE framework, alert anatomy, naming features, empty states, error messages, and the small-word edits that measurably improve UX. Distilled from Apple's writing sessions (2017–2026). Use when writing or reviewing any user-facing text — labels, alerts, onboarding, notifications, empty states, paywalls — or naming a feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Always-on spam and deliverability guardrails for cold email copy. Apply these rules whenever writing, reviewing, or QA-ing subject lines, openers, follow-ups, CTAs, or any cold outreach copy. Trigger on phrases like "check this for spam", "spam word check", "deliverability review", "QA this copy", "flag banned words", "check subject line", "is this safe to send", "scan for spam triggers", or any time cold email copy is being generated or reviewed. Also trigger automatically as a background rule whenever the campaign-copywriting or cold-email-copywriting skill is active -- these guardrails apply to EVERY piece of outbound copy generated, even if the user does not explicitly ask for a check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write viral social media posts that promote affiliate products naturally. Use this skill when the user asks anything about writing social media content for affiliate marketing, creating posts for LinkedIn/X/Reddit/Facebook, promoting a product on social media, writing affiliate content, or mentions "viral post", "social media post", "content for affiliate". Also trigger for: "write a post about X", "help me promote X on LinkedIn", "create a thread about X", "make a Reddit post for X", "draft tweets for X", "social media content for affiliate program", "how to promote X on social", "write something that goes viral", "LinkedIn post for affiliate", "X thread about this tool", "help me sell X naturally on social media".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translates or rewrites Chinese text into English using a 'critical dialogue' tone, characterized by engaging questions, analytical commentary, and a conversational flow while preserving citations and facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Strunk's timeless writing rules to ANY prose humans will read—documentation, commit messages, error messages, explanations, reports, or UI text. Makes your writing clearer, stronger, and more professional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that mines the user for fragments — heterogeneous nuggets of writing (claims, vignettes, sharp sentences, half-thoughts) — and appends them to a single document as raw material for a future article. Use when the user wants to develop ideas before imposing structure, or mentions "fragments", "ideate", or "raw material" for writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and document someone's authentic writing voice from samples. Use when someone needs a "voice guide," wants to capture their writing DNA, or needs to train AI to write in their style. Also useful for ghostwriting, brand voice documentation, or onboarding writers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliminates AI-generated writing patterns that erode reader trust. Use when writing or editing articles, docs, or press releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for social science academic paper drafting, outlining, diagnosis, review, and revision. Trigger for topic diagnosis, research question refinement, literature review planning, CNKI/Google Scholar literature search-to-Zotero workflows, structured paper reading notes, theoretical framework design, research design critique, draft review, section or paragraph revision, citation and evidence risk checking, causal-claim checking, and pre-submission review. Do not use for purely creative writing or non-academic editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。