2,109 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Ship completed work: verify locally, commit related changes, push, create or update the PR, watch CI/reviews, and fix until merge-ready or escalated. Use for "ship it", "create PR", "handoff", or finished code needing delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigating git history, analyzing regression root causes, and performing code archaeology. Time-travels through commits to uncover truth. Use for git history investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gatekeeping Git/PR by classifying change essence and recommending granularity, naming, and strategy; the `ship` recipe also executes PR delivery (create, CI watch, merge, cleanup) with Ask First on merge. Use when PR preparation, commit strategy, or gated PR delivery is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviewing code via multi-engine orchestration (Claude + Codex) on three axes — secure, correct, and lean — shipping only findings worth fixing. Use for PR review or pre-commit. Complements Zen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before committing to an implementation plan, run this skill to stress-test the proposed architecture. Catches over-engineering, circular dependencies, missing failure modes, security gaps, and scalability cliffs — before any code is written. Acts as a "second eye" on the plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a clean PR branch by filtering out .planning/ commits — ready for code review
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safe git revert. Roll back phase or plan commits using the phase manifest with dependency checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a quick task with GSD guarantees (atomic commits, state tracking) but skip optional agents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-fix issues found by code review in REVIEW.md. Spawns fixer agent, commits each fix atomically, produces REVIEW-FIX.md summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Hands-off end-to-end branch dogfood pass with browser testing, auto-fixes, regression tests, and fix commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a human review of a commit, PR, file, or directory. Use when invoked by name
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated security gatekeeper. Blocks unsafe code before commit — secret scanning, OWASP top 10, dependency audit, permission checks. A GATE, not a suggestion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feature implementation orchestrator. ALWAYS use this skill for ANY code change — implement, build, add feature, create, fix bug, or any task that modifies source code. This is the default route for 70% of all requests. Runs full TDD cycle: understand → plan → test → implement → quality → verify → commit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Specialized git operations — semantic commits, PR descriptions, branch management, conflict resolution guidance. Replaces ad-hoc git commands with a dedicated, convention-aware utility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with trend tracking. Per-person breakdowns, shipping streaks, and actionable improvements. Use when asked for "retro", "weekly review", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remix v2 meta/SEO, sessions, auth, and CSRF. Use when working with document head, cookie sessions, auth gates, or CSRF protection. Triggers on meta export (v2 array shape), links export, createCookieSessionStorage, commitSession, destroySession, requireUserId, remix-utils/csrf, remix-auth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect AI-generated writing patterns in developer text — docs, docstrings, commit messages, PR descriptions, and code comments. Use when reviewing any text artifact for authenticity and clarity, or when the user mentions ai writing, ai-generated or robotic writing, text that sounds like AI or ChatGPT, or writing quality. Builds on the docs-style core writing principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to pressure-test a product, internal-tool, or OSS concept against Amazon's Working Backwards PRFAQ gauntlet before committing to a spec. Triggers on: "work backwards", "write a PRFAQ", "press release first", "is this idea worth building", "pressure-test this concept", "filter this before brainstorm", "is this a real product". Also catches solution-first pitches ("I want to build X that does Y") and technology-first pitches ("use AI to...") that need customer-first filtering. Produces a binary pass/fail verdict, not a polished doc. Hardcore coaching — direct, skeptical, concrete. On pass, hands off to brainstorm-beagle with a concept brief. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, scaffold projects, or draft specs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。