「control」の検索結果

SSTI playbook. Use when template expressions, server-side rendering, preview features, or templating engines may evaluate attacker-controlled content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stack overflow and ROP playbook. Use when exploiting buffer overflows to hijack control flow via return address overwrite, ROP chains, ret2libc, ret2csu, ret2dlresolve, or SROP on Linux userland binaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JNDI injection playbook. Use when Java applications perform JNDI lookups with attacker-controlled names, especially via Log4j2, Spring, or any code path reaching InitialContext.lookup().

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon, vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit, source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage, detection engineering, incident response, or choosing the right next category skill before any deep topic skill. Also use when the user mentions 安全工程师, 渗透测试, 红队, 蓝队, 代码审计, 源码泄露, SRC. Enforce impact-first testing, finish the current asset cluster before expanding, follow half-chains to real control, and require live verification of secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP Host header injection and routing abuse playbook. Use when the application trusts the Host header for generating URLs, routing requests, or access control — enabling password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF via routing, and virtual host bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code obfuscation analysis and deobfuscation playbook. Use when reversing binaries protected by junk code, opaque predicates, self-modifying code, control flow flattening, VM protection, or string encryption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supply-chain testing via package-manager dependency confusion: when internal package names resolve to attacker-controlled public registries, leading to malicious install and script execution. Use for npm/pip/gem/Maven/Composer/Docker manifest review and authorized red-team supply-chain exercises.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNS rebinding attack playbook. Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attacker-controlled domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email header injection and spoofing playbook. Use when testing contact forms, email APIs, password reset flows, or any feature that constructs SMTP messages with user-controlled fields. Covers CRLF injection in headers, SPF/DKIM/DMARC bypass, and phishing amplification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format string exploitation playbook. Use when printf-family functions receive user-controlled format strings, enabling arbitrary stack reads (%p/%s), arbitrary memory writes (%n/%hn/%hhn), GOT/hook overwrites, and canary/libc/PIE leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for injection testing. Use when routing between XSS, SQLi, SSRF, XXE, SSTI, command injection, and NoSQL injection workflows based on how attacker-controlled input is consumed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source control and artifact exposure (.git, .svn, .hg, backups, .env). Use when recon finds VCS paths, 403 on hidden dirs, or backup/config leaks during authorized testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expression Language injection playbook. Use when Java EL, SpEL, OGNL, or MVEL expressions may evaluate attacker-controlled input in Spring, Struts2, Confluence, or similar frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize web performance through network protocols, resource loading, and browser rendering internals. Use when the user mentions "my site is slow", "Core Web Vitals", "HTTP/2 or HTTP/3", "resource hints", "network latency", "render blocking", "TCP/TLS optimization", "service worker", "Cache-Control or caching strategy", or "critical rendering path". Also trigger when diagnosing slow page loads, optimizing time to first byte, choosing between WebSocket and SSE, or reducing bundle sizes. For UI visual performance, see refactoring-ui. For font loading, see web-typography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dstack is an open-source control plane for GPU provisioning and orchestration across GPU clouds, Kubernetes, and on-prem clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement authentication and authorization with Better Auth - a framework-agnostic TypeScript authentication framework. Features include email/password authentication with verification, OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Discord, etc.), two-factor authentication (TOTP, SMS), passkeys/WebAuthn support, session management, role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, and database adapters. Use when adding authentication to applications, implementing OAuth flows, setting up 2FA/MFA, managing user sessions, configuring authorization rules, or building secure authentication systems for web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Crabbox from macOS, Linux, or native Windows controllers to run OpenClaw Windows node builds, tests, and targeted proof on remote native Windows or WSL2 hosts, including Azure or brokered AWS leases and static SSH hosts. Use when remote Windows validation is needed or the user asks for Crabbox validation. Always report the actual provider, lease id, run URL, command, and result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, run, debug and ship 3D city games in Godot 4 — procedurally generated cities (block grids, districts, weighted building typologies, MultiMesh batching, facade shaders, terrain, day/night, landmarks), first-person controllers, headless verification, Blender-generated .glb assets, rigged character and animation packs, real OpenStreetMap-derived cities, WebAssembly export, and cloud GPU streaming on GCP. Use this skill whenever the work involves Godot or a .gd/.tscn/.gdshader/project.godot file; whenever someone wants to start, set up, clone onto a new machine, or stand up a 3D game or city generator; whenever they mention procedural city, city generator, block grid, building typology, MultiMesh, facade shader, terrain heightmap, navmesh, Godot export templates, export presets, headless Godot, .glb pipeline, Blender asset generation, character rigs or borrowed animations; and whenever they want to deploy or share a game — web export, SharedArrayBuffer/COOP/COEP, Selkies, pixel streaming, GPU VM, or "let people play this without installing anything." Reach for it even on vague asks like "get this running", "why is my city slow", "my model faces backwards", "make it work on a cloud machine", or "set this up somewhere else too" when a Godot 3D project is in play.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build safe, local, defensive reproductions of ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed security vulnerabilities (CVEs, vendor advisories, AI-agent incidents) for whitepapers, control testing, and education. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, or write up a known vulnerability or security incident — phrases like "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "demonstrate the EchoLeak/Cursor/postmark-mcp issue", "show how this exploit worked", "add a reproducibility guide", or "pull the NVD/CVE details for". It fetches advisory metadata from NVD and CVE.org, confirms the issue is fixed, and produces a vulnerable-vs-patched harness that is offline, loopback-only, and uses synthetic markers. It NEVER discovers, develops, or weaponizes new zero-days and refuses any unpatched or live-target request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end methodology for reproducing AND patching publicly disclosed, already-fixed vulnerabilities: sourcing the advisory and the fix commit, reading the patch diff, rebuilding a pinned offline lab, building a vulnerable-vs-patched contrast harness with proper controls, minimizing the trigger, designing and validating the fix, and writing it up as a blog post or whitepaper. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reproduce, demonstrate, understand, teach, or write about a known vulnerability or security incident: "reproduce this CVE", "build a repro for", "how did EchoLeak / Log4Shell / the postmark-mcp package actually work", "show me how this exploit worked", "write a blog post about this vulnerability", "set up a lab for CVE-XXXX", "pull the NVD/CVE/OSV details", or "make a PoC I can publish". Use it just as eagerly for the patching half: "how should this be fixed", "is this patch correct", "what would have caught this", "review this security fix", "write a regression test for this CVE", "how do I backport this", or "what's the right fix for this bug class" - even when the user never says the word "reproduce". Reach for it on vague asks like "help me understand this security advisory", "I want to write about this incident", or "can we test whether we were vulnerable" when a disclosed vulnerability is in play. This skill only handles ALREADY-PATCHED, publicly disclosed issues and refuses zero-day discovery, live targets, and weaponization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remote-control tmux sessions for interactive CLIs by sending keystrokes and scraping pane output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and runs cloud infrastructure — environments, infrastructure as code, networking and isolation, scaling, and cost. Use this to design a cloud environment, control infrastructure spend, set up environment separation, plan for scale or region failure, or review infrastructure someone configured by hand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies what could go wrong in a system before it is built or changed — the assets worth attacking, the entry points, the trust boundaries, and the controls that actually address the realistic threats. Use this when designing a feature or system, when a change touches authentication, data handling, payments, or external input, before a security review, or when deciding which security work is worth doing at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。