「iso」の検索結果

Advises on Amazon RDS open-source engines (MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL) for instance creation, upgrade planning, commitment pricing, proxy evaluation, and Blue/Green deployments. Handles any RDS MySQL, MariaDB, or PostgreSQL question, including create a production-ready RDS MySQL instance, provision an RDS PostgreSQL database, run the RDS upgrade advisor for my RDS MySQL instance, what are my upgrade options, upgrade RDS MariaDB from 10.6 to the latest version, should I buy reserved instances or a savings plan for db.r7g.2xlarge RDS MySQL, change a VARCHAR to INT column on RDS MySQL 8.0 with Blue/Green, and does RDS Proxy help when PgBouncer already runs in transaction mode. Covers instance creation with production best practices, describe-db-instances and describe-db-engine-versions upgrade-target workflow, live prechecks via SSM or direct connection, RI versus DSP commitment pricing, RDS Proxy versus PgBouncer, and Blue/Green lifecycle with binlog replay compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates, configures, and migrates workloads to AWS Lambda Managed Instances (LMI). Runs Lambda Event Functions (standard Lambda) on EC2 instances in the user's account while AWS manages provisioning, patching, scaling, routing, and load balancing. Triggers when queries mention Lambda Managed Instances, LMI, capacity providers, multi-concurrent execution environments, EC2-backed Lambda, persistent Lambda instances, PerExecutionEnvironmentMaxConcurrency, CapacityProviderConfig, cold start elimination via dedicated instances, migrating Lambda Event Functions to managed instances, or cost comparison between Lambda Event Functions and LMI with Savings Plans or Reserved Instances. Also covers long-running and asynchronous workloads and the 90-minute (5400s) function timeout for asynchronous and event-source-mapping (SQS, Kinesis, DynamoDB Streams / ESM) invocations, including how to raise the function timeout up to 90 minutes / 5400s and the related duration limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides an end-to-end data-warehouse migration to Amazon Redshift — discovery, schema/SQL/stored-procedure/macro/script conversion, data migration, validation, performance comparison, and reporting. Source-routed via `references/<source>/`; Teradata (Vantage) is the supported source; additional sources are added as their own `references/<source>/` sets. Text-only knowledge (no executable code) — the AI generates all execution at runtime. Applies when a user wants to migrate Teradata to Amazon Redshift, convert Teradata DDL/SQL/stored procedures/macros/BTEQ to Redshift/RSQL, or assess Teradata-to-Redshift migration complexity. Applies only to migrations targeting Amazon Redshift; migrations to other platforms (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, etc.) are out of scope regardless of source. Does not cover general Redshift administration, performance tuning, or troubleshooting of existing Redshift clusters (no migration involved), or sources not listed under references/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate Expo and React Native into an existing native iOS or Android app. Use for brownfield, embedding a React Native screen in SwiftUI/UIKit or Kotlin, or AAR/XCFramework packaging. Covers isolated and integrated approaches. For building or distributing a purely native app with EAS, use eas-app-stores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and design a typed AssemblyAI adapter that isolates SDK drift, regional routing, polling, and streaming lifecycles. Use when integrating an official SDK. Trigger with "AssemblyAI SDK pattern", "AssemblyAI adapter", or "wrap AssemblyAI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harden an Attio integration with least-privilege credentials, tenant isolation, log redaction, raw-body webhook verification, idempotency, and incident-ready rotation. Use when reviewing Attio security controls or preparing production access. Trigger with "Attio security", "secure Attio integration", or "Attio webhook signature".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Claude API across dev, staging, and production environments with isolated keys, model routing, and spend controls per environment. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic environments", "claude multi-env", "anthropic staging setup", "claude dev vs prod config".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an NFT discovery workflow with Alchemy NFT API v3 and isolate typed on-chain reads through viem. Use when creating collection explorers or ownership checks. Trigger with "Alchemy NFT API", "NFT collection explorer", or "read an NFT contract".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design isolated Algolia development, staging, preview, and production targets with explicit promotion rules. Use when environments share credentials or index names, or previews need bounded search data. Trigger with "Algolia environments", "Algolia staging setup", or "preview index".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy an Adobe-backed service or App Builder application with isolated environments, immutable artifacts, canaries, observability, and rollback. Use when the task requires adobe integration deployment. Trigger with "deploy Adobe integration", "aio app deploy", or "promote Adobe app".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Separate Adobe development, stage, and production organizations/projects/workspaces, credentials, profiles, storage, events, budgets, and evidence. Use when the task requires adobe multi-environment isolation. Trigger with "Adobe environments", "separate Adobe staging", or "Adobe workspace setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Doctrine for designing and evolving any **SDK** Grida ships — TypeScript, Rust, or otherwise. "SDK" here means a surface that crosses a foreign-or-foreign-treated boundary: published packages, separately-versioned consumers, FFI bindings, public-by-design modules. An SDK's job is to refuse; a strict, honest surface rejects the wrong contents and keeps the package testable in isolation. Default is "core, not customizable"; customization is the exception, defended by a deciding table. Use when authoring or evolving any such surface — `@grida/*` published packages, engine crates (gridaco/nothing `crates/*`) published or FFI-exported, intent/message vocabularies, any contract a second author will compile against. Internal-only helper packages are welcome to follow, not forced. Companion skill for two-sided contract work: $sdk-seam. Critique partners: $pedantic, $etiology. Related: $naming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to generate detailed English prompts for AI image tools (NanoBanana / Gemini / DALL-E / Midjourney) to produce top-conference-quality academic figures — including framework diagrams, network architecture diagrams, pipeline flowcharts, module detail diagrams, comparison/ablation figures, and data pattern grids — especially when the user says "论文配图提示词", "生成论文配图", "学术论文生图", "架构图提示词", "框架图提示词", "顶会风格配图", "CVPR 风格图", "NeurIPS 风格图", "paper figure prompt", "academic diagram prompt", or provides a LaTeX/PDF/Word paper and asks for figure prompts. If the user has not specified a color scheme, present the 8 preset palette options and color tool links before generating any prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Network protocol attack playbook. Use when exploiting layer 2/3 protocols including ARP spoofing, LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS poisoning, WPAD abuse, DHCPv6 attacks, VLAN hopping, STP manipulation, DNS spoofing, IPv6 attacks, and IDS/IPS evasion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sandbox escape playbook. Use when breaking out of Python sandbox, Lua sandbox, seccomp filter, chroot jail, container/Docker, browser sandbox, or namespace isolation to achieve unrestricted code execution or file access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web cache deception and poisoning playbook. Use when CDN, reverse proxy, or application caching may serve sensitive authenticated content to other users due to path confusion or cache key manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a large aged codebase everyone fears to touch to one that is safe to change, legible, bounded, and resilient - paid down in place without a rewrite. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, refactoring-patterns, clean-code, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, domain-driven-design - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, REMOVE-TECHNICAL-DEBT-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to tame a legacy codebase, pay down technical debt safely, avoid a big-bang rewrite, or says 'we are afraid to touch this code'. For a fresh vibe-coded prototype, improve-code-quality; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product-and-UX pass, improve-app; to optimize a working codebase for speed, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a stalled, plateaued business to one with an honest diagnosis, a working operating rhythm, and offers repriced to real value. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - good-strategy-bad-strategy, traction-eos, high-output-management, team-topologies, drive-motivation, lean-analytics, negotiation, monetizing-innovation - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (STRATEGY.md, OPERATIONS.md, METRICS.md, IMPROVE-BUSINESS-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a business that has plateaued, diagnose why growth stalled, tighten strategy and execution, re-motivate a team, or says 'revenue is flat and I do not know why'. Starting from scratch with no customers: use create-business. Once the fundamentals work and the goal is expansion: use grow-business. When the product itself drags the business down: use improve-app. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。