2,387 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audits and troubleshoots DNS records for domains including A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, TXT, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, CAA, and NS records. Use when someone needs to verify DNS configuration, debug DNS propagation issues, check email authentication records, or audit domain security. Trigger words: DNS records, dig, nslookup, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX records, DNS propagation, nameservers, CAA, domain configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy and manage applications, databases, and services on Coolify. Use when a user asks to deploy an app to Coolify, manage Coolify deployments, check deployment logs, sync environment variables, create or manage databases on Coolify, trigger a deployment, manage Coolify servers, or troubleshoot Coolify issues. Covers the Coolify CLI and REST API. For infrastructure provisioning on Hetzner, see hetzner-cloud.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit web pages and components for WCAG 2.2 accessibility compliance. Use when a user asks to check accessibility, find a11y issues, audit for WCAG compliance, fix screen reader problems, check color contrast, ensure keyboard navigation works, or prepare for accessibility regulations like the European Accessibility Act or ADA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep technical SEO auditing covering crawlability, indexation, Core Web Vitals, site architecture, canonicalization, structured data validation, and performance optimization. Use when the user asks about technical SEO, site audits, crawl issues, indexation problems, Core Web Vitals, page speed, or site architecture optimization. For content-focused SEO, see the seo-content-writer skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google Tag Manager expertise. Audit GTM containers, design tag and trigger architecture, debug firing issues, implement consent mode v2, and advise on server-side tagging. Use when the user asks about GTM, tag management, container audits, consent mode, server-side tagging, or tracking implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-repository dependency audit. Scans package manifests for outdated packages, security advisories, version conflicts, and license issues. Produces a prioritized update plan. Supports Node.js, Python, Rust, and Go projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code cleanup and refactoring agent that identifies and fixes code quality issues without changing functionality. Focuses on: - Dead code removal - Import organization - Type improvements - Consistent patterns - File organization Use when "User asks to "clean up" code, User mentions "dead code" or "unused", User wants to "organize imports", User asks about "code quality", User wants to "refactor" without changing behavior, Code review identifies cleanup items, After major feature completion, cleanup, refactoring, code-quality, maintenance, organization" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code architecture for maintainability, catch structural issues before they become debtUse when "Reviewing pull requests with structural changes, Planning refactoring work, Evaluating new feature architecture, Assessing technical debt, Before major releases, When code feels "hard to change", architecture, code-review, refactoring, design-patterns, technical-debt, dependencies, maintainability" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical SEO site audit via the DataForSEO On-Page API. Crawls the site (up to 100 pages by default), surfaces critical errors (broken links, redirect chains, missing meta, slow pages, schema gaps, indexability issues), and returns a Technical Score (0-100) with prioritized fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with GitHub using the `gh` CLI. Use `gh issue`, `gh pr`, `gh run`, and `gh api` for issues, PRs, CI runs, and advanced queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tauri v2+ cross-platform app development with Rust backend. Use when configuring tauri.conf.json, implementing Rust commands (#[tauri::command]), setting up IPC patterns (invoke, emit, channels), configuring permissions/capabilities, troubleshooting build issues, or deploying desktop/mobile apps. Triggers on Tauri, src-tauri, invoke, emit, capabilities.json.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan code or configuration for common security issues. Use when a mid-level developer needs a quick security pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain CSS layout issues and propose fixes. Use when a junior developer is struggling with alignment or spacing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
分析 GitHub issues、PRs 与 discussions，提供见解或实施指导。在用户提供 GitHub URL、issue/PR 编号或询问仓库内容时使用。典型场景：看 issue/PR 状态、拉 diff 与 checks、要结论与建议下一步时。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close a GitHub issue with a synthesis comment as a flowing graph — validate the synthesis, post the closing comment, close, then run a pluggable callback (e.g. memory store) detached. Use when closing an issue should also capture the LEARNING (not just the diff log) and when the post-close work shouldn't block the close ack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practical Python scripts for debugging awf - parse logs, diagnose issues, inspect containers, test domains
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug the AWF firewall by inspecting Docker containers (awf-squid, awf-agent), analyzing Squid access logs, checking iptables rules, and troubleshooting blocked domains or network issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Odoo 19 development knowledge base with 18 specialized guides covering Actions (ir.actions.*, cron jobs, server actions), Controllers (HTTP routing, endpoints, auth types), Data files (XML/CSV records, shortcuts, noupdate), API Decorators (@api.depends, @api.constrains, @api.ondelete, @api.onchange, @api.model, @api.private), SQL Constraints (models.Constraint replacing _sql_constraints), Database Indexes (models.Index), Module development (manifest, wizards, reports), Field types (Char, Text, Monetary, relational fields), Manifest configuration (__manifest__.py, dependencies, asset bundles), Mixins (mail.thread, mail.activity.mixin, mail.alias.mixin, utm.mixin), ORM Model methods (search, CRUD, domain filters, recordsets, CamelCase model naming), Migration scripts (pre/post/end hooks, data migration), OWL frontend components (hooks, services, lifecycle), Performance optimization (N+1 prevention, batch ops, _read_group), QWeb Reports (PDF/HTML, paper formats, barcodes, t-out), Security/ACL (record rules, field permissions, privilege-based groups, @api.private), Testing (TransactionCase, HttpCase, mocking, query count assertions), Transactions (savepoints, UniqueViolation, serialization failures), Translations (i18n, PO files, translatable fields), XML Views (list/form/search, kanban card templates, xpath inheritance, QWeb templates). Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging any Odoo 19 Python or XML code, creating or modifying modules, fixing performance issues, or looking up Odoo 19 API patterns and best practices. Includes CSS/SCSS asset authoring and review for Odoo addons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze existing XML sitemaps or generate new ones with industry templates. Validates format, URLs, and structure. Use when user says "sitemap", "generate sitemap", "sitemap issues", or "XML sitemap".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。