Use when positioning an AISTATS submission against AI, machine-learning, statistics, and uncertainty literature, including arXiv preprints, workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, PMLR archival status, and the two-community citation coverage that AISTATS reviewers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when the contribution of an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript is fuzzy or oversold relative to the closest existing results. Stakes the theorem-relative delta against the nearest theory; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model) or frame the prose (see aejmic-writing-style).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when the marginal contribution of an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript is fuzzy or undersold and must be staked precisely against prior applied-micro work. Positions the contribution; it does not fix the identification (aeja-identification) or the prose (aeja-writing-style).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when situating an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript within organization-theory conversations and sharpening the gap/tension it addresses. Positions the argument; it does not develop the core theory or write the methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when positioning an ACM CCS submission against the security big-four and specialist literature, including arXiv preprints, prior CCS/S&P/USENIX/NDSS papers, concurrent disclosures, CVE and advisory records, and the attack-and-defense lineage that a SIGSAC program committee expects to see credited.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when building or auditing the related-work section of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — covering the multimedia literature spread across vision, audio/speech, language, HCI/QoE, and systems, handling arXiv-speed concurrency, keeping citations double-blind, and verifying that cited "ACM MM papers" are ACM MM and not ICMR, MMSys, CVPR, or TOMM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when positioning an ACL submission against the NLP literature, covering ACL Anthology citation practice, arXiv-versus-published version citation, concurrent LLM-era preprints, prior-cycle ARR resubmission overlap, anonymity-preserving self-citation, and the fast-moving baseline problem in computational linguistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when framing or sharpening a topic for 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — turning a generic "X affects Y" empirical idea into an accounting contribution anchored in China's institutional setting, accounting theory, and standard-setting / practice relevance. Use before literature review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and reinforcement-learning literature spread across AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and JAAMAS, including arXiv and workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, and the cross-community citation coverage AAMAS reviewers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Use when building exhibits for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the signature framework figure, who-studied-what synthesis tables, and search/coverage exhibits that summarize across a literature. Designs review exhibits; it does not produce original-estimate regression tables (an Annals review reports no new data of its own).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills☆ 1,2612026年9月27日 更新
Research a company's ideal customer profiles and build detailed synthetic buyer personas. Identifies 4-6 distinct buyer segments through web research, then creates rich, realistic personas with demographics, motivations, skepticism profiles, decision criteria, and language patterns. Use when you need to understand who your buyers are at a deep level — their motivations, objections, and how they evaluate solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Qualifies inbound leads against full ICP criteria — company size, industry, use case fit, role/seniority of the person. Checks CRM and existing customer base for duplicates and existing relationships. Outputs a scored CSV with qualification status, reasoning, and pipeline overlap flags. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM, enrichment tool, or data source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Research LinkedIn profiles and write personalized messages for any LinkedIn message type — connection requests, InMails, DMs, message requests, post comments, and comment replies. Takes LinkedIn URLs as input, researches each person (profile data + recent posts via Apify), and generates messages tailored to each lead's background, interests, and recent activity. Exports tool-ready CSVs for Dripify, Expandi, Botdog, PhantomBuster, or generic format. No LinkedIn cookies or login required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Lead qualification engine with conversational intake. Asks structured questions to understand your qualification criteria, generates a reusable qualification prompt, then batch-enriches leads via Apify LinkedIn scraping and scores them with parallel processing. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning to CSV or whatever output format the user prefers. Supports calibration mode for prompt refinement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Discover newsletters in a target niche relevant to your ICP, evaluate audience fit, estimate reach and CPM, and output a ranked shortlist of sponsorship opportunities. Uses web search to find newsletters, then scores each against ICP alignment criteria. Use when a marketing team wants to reach an existing engaged audience for less than the cost of building their own, or when testing a new channel before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Generate a personal voice guide for X (Twitter) and/or LinkedIn by scanning a user's past posts and iteratively refining with sample-and-feedback loops. Produces a structured markdown voice guide that sibling skills (create-x-content, create-linkedin-content) consume to draft in-voice posts. Different from brand-voice-extractor, which analyses company blogs/landing pages — this skill is for personal social voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills☆ 1,2522026年10月16日 更新
Configure Simulink models for Embedded Coder (ERT), Simulink Coder (GRT rapid-prototyping), or AUTOSAR code generation. Use when the user asks to generate embedded C or C++ code, run a full build of a model, produce a code generation report, configure a model for production/ECU deployment or rapid-prototyping code, target ARM or x86 hardware, apply MISRA C/C++ compliance (ERT/AUTOSAR only — Simulink Coder does not ship MISRA profiles), or set up GRT, ERT, AUTOSAR, or shared-library targets. Handles target selection, hardware mapping, model hierarchy propagation, and constraint introspection via the configure_for_codegen function. Do NOT use for GRT shared-library variants (grt_malloc.tlc), DDS, or ROS, or for iterative optimization workflows that measure baseline metrics, apply targeted changes, and re-measure to confirm improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
matlab/simulink-agentic-toolkit☆ 1,2312026年10月15日 更新
Select colormaps and qualitative palettes for scientific figures using perceptual-uniformity, color-vision-deficiency safety, and luminance-monotonicity criteria. Covers Crameri scientific colormaps, viridis/cividis/magma, Okabe-Ito categorical, ColorBrewer, and the rainbow/jet critique. Use when choosing palettes for heatmaps, scatter, networks, or any encoding where color carries quantitative or categorical meaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPTomics/bioSkills☆ 1,2232026年8月15日 更新
Build interactive HTML/web visualizations with plotly (Python/R), bokeh (Python), and gganimate/plotly frames for animation, with awareness of current Kaleido static-export model (post-orca-EOL), HTML file-size bloat, and the limits of interactive-only output for journal submission. Use when producing zoomable/hoverable plots for notebook EDA, supplementary HTML, dashboards, or animated time-course / iteration visualizations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPTomics/bioSkills☆ 1,2232026年8月15日 更新
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPTomics/bioSkills☆ 1,2232026年8月15日 更新
ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GPTomics/bioSkills☆ 1,2232026年8月15日 更新
Report the compatibility redirect to `ap-independent-checker`; this retired role cannot perform new work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spielewoy/autoprompt-skill☆ 1,2012026年10月4日 更新
Select and use Audio Toolbox acoustic, psychoacoustic, and speech quality metrics. Use when computing loudness, sharpness, roughness, fluctuation strength, noise criteria (NC/RNC/RC), speech transmission index (STI), speech intelligibility index (SII), speech quality (ViSQOL, STOI), SPL, reverberation time (RT60), tone-to-noise ratio, or prominence ratio. Also use when asked about PESQ, POLQA, calibration factor, EBU R 128, LUFS, HVAC noise, background noise evaluation, or how to measure audio quality or noise compliance. Covers calibration, standard selection, signal alignment, and the complete function inventory including what does NOT exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
matlab/matlab-agentic-toolkit☆ 1,1732026年10月14日 更新