「orr」の検索結果

Store data permanently in the Cognee knowledge graph. Accepts a data category (user, project, or agent) to tag the data with the correct node_set for filtered retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a professional, send-ready deliverable on the user's behalf — in the correct file format (never raw markdown), in the user's voice, structured to lead with the strongest material, and free of document-level AI tells. Runs a gated pipeline with a fresh-context verification policeman and a Stop-hook that won't let the session finish without a verified PASS. Use when producing a job take-home, client report, executive one-pager, slide deck, proposal, or anything going out under the user's name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews logs, metrics, traces, alerts, correlation, dashboards, and diagnostic instrumentation so failures and performance changes can be detected and explained at component boundaries. Use for observability work, incident readiness, instrumentation, or production diagnostics. Not for fixing a specific incident before reproducing it or for adding noisy logging without an operational question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies systematic code review patterns and checklists. Use when reviewing PRs or diffs for correctness, security, readability, maintainability, and AI-generated changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proves protocols and agent workflows with TLA+, P, Alloy, Z3, Dafny, or Lean. Use when proving protocols correct, writing TLA+ specs, or verifying LLM proofs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static code review of the active diff: trace changed paths and report concrete P1/P2/P3 correctness, security, or spec bugs with file:line evidence. Use for code review or bug checks. Not runtime QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create tasteful circular/orbital HUD and aura animations around a Blender subject using source-derived arcs, dots, dashes, opacity, parallax, and restrained motion. Use when decorative circles, halos, orbit markers, scanner rings, or HUD effects must correlate with a logo/mascot rather than looking like random oversized rings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate skill files for structural compliance and behavioral correctness. Three modes: static (linter), spec (behavioral), audit (coverage report).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates placeholder .aseprite files from asset specs using the Aseprite MCP. Reads asset specs and art bible, creates sprites with correct dimensions/palette/layers, exports PNGs. Run after /asset-spec has produced specs and /art-bible exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every task that plans, writes, edits, debugs, tests, refactors, reviews, or maintains code. Apply to professional repositories, scripts, apps, services, prototypes, beginner work, vibe coding, and bounded code changes inside large systems. Choose the fewest clear lines, files, paths, states, and abstractions that correctly implement the requested behavior. Do not invent fallbacks, compatibility paths, defensive layers, or future scale without evidence. Do not use for ordinary conversation, emotional support, prose, translation, summarization, social-media content, or general research or technical discussion that is not part of planning, changing, or reviewing code. Never weaken real security, integrity, concurrency, compatibility, privacy, accessibility, legal, or regulatory requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviewing code via multi-engine orchestration (Claude + Codex) on three axes — secure, correct, and lean — shipping only findings worth fixing. Use for PR review or pre-commit. Complements Zen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when writing, reviewing, or modifying SQL queries — including SELECT, CTEs, joins, aggregations, window functions, and validating query correctness or performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an inquiry sequence anchored in a local ecosystem that embeds science or geography curriculum content. Use when teaching through local living systems like gardens, ponds, or hedgerows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a document set for a document-based lesson — selecting and sequencing sources for analytical tension around a central question. Use when assembling sources for a new lesson or when an existing set produces flat responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adapt a historical primary source for classroom use — modifying complexity and length while preserving features for sourcing, close reading, and corroboration. Use when a primary source is too complex for the target age group.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounds every implementation decision in official documentation. Use when you want to verify an approach against the official docs before implementing it, or when you want authoritative, source-cited code free from outdated patterns. Use when building with any framework or library where correctness matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project onboarding - determine project type, complexity, tech stack, and route to correct phase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-enforcement layer that routes EVERY agent action through the correct skill. MUST check this routing table before ANY response involving code, files, or technical decisions. Default: route to rune:cook for code tasks. Prevents rationalization, enforces check-before-act discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。