4,993 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Advanced web search, content extraction, and site mapping through Tavily via SandBase. Use when asked for web research, URL content extraction, full article reading, news search, or site structure discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find web pages and content similar to a given URL using Exa's neural similarity search. Ideal for competitor discovery, alternative source finding, related content research, and expanding research beyond known sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research companies with employee reviews, product reviews, industry classification, and competitive landscape through Akta. Covers company enrichment, employee satisfaction signals, product feedback, industry mapping, and news monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any topic across the last 30 days using Reddit, Twitter, YouTube, Hacker News, web search, and news sources through SandBase. Use when asked for recent trends, launch reactions, competitor activity, person/company profiles, or current event analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research competitor advertising strategies through Facebook Ad Library, Google SERP ads, and social media sponsored content. Covers creative analysis, messaging patterns, targeting signals, and campaign frequency for competitive marketing intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any domain with WHOIS data, DNS records, SSL certificate details, domain age, reputation scoring, and security header analysis. Covers ownership research, infrastructure mapping, security assessment, and competitive domain analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research target audiences across Reddit, Twitter, Instagram, and Xiaohongshu to understand demographics, interests, pain points, language patterns, and content preferences. Produces audience personas backed by real community data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research any topic across China's major social platforms — Weibo, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Bilibili, and Zhihu — simultaneously. Aggregates discussion volume, sentiment, key opinion leaders, and platform-specific trends for comprehensive China market intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research online communities across Reddit, Telegram, and social platforms. Analyzes community size, engagement patterns, discussion themes, moderation culture, and member demographics for community strategy, partnership, and go-to-market planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and monitor news articles across Google News through SandBase. Use when asked for news monitoring, current events research, news coverage analysis, or media tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research public companies and listed securities with current market, company, ownership, and filing data through SandBase. Use for ticker analysis, price-performance comparisons, insider activity, or an evidence-backed investment research brief; do not use for trade execution or personalized financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research and write evidence-backed listicles, product roundups, and best-of comparisons with optional SandBase SERP, page, review, and screenshot evidence. Use for ‘best tools’, ‘top products’, roundup, SEO, GEO, or answer-engine content; do not use for an unresearched promotional ranking presented as independent advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, extract, and compare high-quality public sources with Exa through SandBase. Use when asked for deep web research, source discovery, current evidence, topic investigation, company research, or citation-ready findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Papers With Code CLI (`pwc`) for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, frameworks, and benchmark leaderboards, and submitting authenticated paper edits through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, `pwc`, or `pwc-cli`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Papers With Code MCP tools for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, and frameworks, and inspecting benchmark leaderboards with model-size and metric filters through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, the PwC MCP server, or paperswithcode.co/mcp.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
安全研究元思考方法论 - 从先知社区5600+篇安全文档中提炼的漏洞挖掘方法论框架。 Use this skill when: - 进行漏洞挖掘和安全研究时，需要系统化的思考框架 - 分析特定类型漏洞（Web注入、反序列化、二进制、域渗透等）的攻击路径 - 需要了解绕过防护措施（WAF、EDR、沙箱）的思维模式 - 进行代码审计需要Source-Sink分析方法论 - 红队攻防需要完整攻击链规划 - CTF竞赛需要快速解题思路 - 逆向分析恶意软件需要方法论指导 Triggers: 漏洞挖掘、安全研究、渗透测试、代码审计、红队攻防、CTF、逆向分析、 WAF绕过、免杀、提权、横向移动、域渗透、反序列化、二进制安全、Fuzzing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the competitive landscape before positioning your product for PRD v0.2 Market Definition. Triggers on completing v0.1 Spark, analyzing competitors, researching market, or requests like "competitive analysis", "who else solves this", "market landscape", "what alternatives exist", "competitor research", "feature comparison". Outputs CFD- entries for competitive intelligence and BR- entries for positioning rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end content creation pipeline from research through editorial review to social distribution. Orchestrates a 3-stage workflow: research, draft/edit, and distribute. Supports blog posts, LinkedIn, Twitter threads, newsletters, and essays.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO toolkit for Claude Code, powered by the DataForSEO API. Replaces the data layer of an SEO agency: keyword research, competitor analysis, rank tracking, backlink audits, technical site crawls, content gap analysis, and client-ready PDF reports — all with real Google search data, not scraping. Use when the user says "seo", "keyword research", "rank check", "backlinks", "competitor analysis", "site audit", "content gap", "compare domains", or passes a domain / URL / keyword for SEO analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches real projects, papers, and documented failures before proposing a new feature, architecture, or technology choice. Use for design decisions with multiple valid approaches, not for implementing an existing spec or fixing a known bug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。