Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,686 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `security-reviewer` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `security-guardian` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps observed adversary behaviors, security alerts, and detection rules to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and sub-techniques to quantify detection coverage and guide control prioritization. Use when building an ATT&CK-based coverage heatmap, tagging SIEM alerts with technique IDs, aligning security controls to adversary playbooks, or reporting threat exposure to executives. Activates for requests involving ATT&CK Navigator, Sigma rules, MITRE D3FEND, or coverage gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates structured cyber threat intelligence reports at strategic, operational, and tactical levels tailored to specific audiences including executives, security operations teams, and technical analysts. Use when producing finished intelligence products from raw collection data, creating sector threat briefings, or delivering post-incident intelligence assessments. Activates for requests involving CTI report writing, threat briefings, intelligence products, finished intelligence, or executive security reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code for quality and security issues. Combines code quality review with security vulnerability detection. Use when reviewing code after generation in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for Archify, interactive or animated HTML diagrams, インタラクティブ図, 動く構成図. When an editable .drawio file is required, use the draw.io workflow instead and treat Archify HTML only as a supplement.
Generate Azure environment monthly report (Markdown + PowerPoint) from Azure Advisor and Cost Management API. Use when creating Advisor recommendations report, cost trend analysis, or security/reliability assessment for a customer subscription. Triggers on 'Advisor report', 'Azure monthly report', 'subscription report', 'Azure環境レポート', '簡易月次レポート'.
Security testing checklist for HTTP APIs—authn/z, input validation, rate limits, sensitive data exposure, and common OWASP API issues. Use when reviewing or testing REST/GraphQL endpoints before release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify compliance with OWASP Top 10 2021 security standards. Use when performing OWASP compliance checks and security certification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude-native review of code for quality, structure, naming, and maintainability (no external AI). Use when reviewing a file or diff for code quality before committing. Trigger on "review this code", "code review", "is this well-written". For security, use /security-verify; for companion-AI review, use /review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API security automation skill for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs. Covers OpenAPI/AsyncAPI ingestion, authenticated fuzzing, OWASP API Top 10 (BOLA, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF), schema diffing, GraphQL introspection abuse, JWT and OAuth misuse, rate-limit and replay testing. Use to automate API assessments with safe, scoped, evidence-backed findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security Operations Center skill for alert triage, detection engineering, incident response, log analysis, threat hunting, SIEM queries, EDR investigation, timeline building, IOC handling, escalation notes, containment recommendations, and analyst-ready reporting. Use for blue-team operations, suspicious event analysis, and defensive cybersecurity workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud security posture skill for AWS, Azure, GCP, and multi-cloud. Covers IAM least-privilege, key and secret hygiene, network exposure, data protection, logging coverage, IaC scanning (Terraform, CloudFormation, Bicep, Pulumi), CSPM remediation, and landing-zone hardening. Use for misconfig discovery, IaC review, and automated drift-and-fix workflows on cloud accounts you own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building Django applications - security hardening, authentication and permissions, ORM optimization, PostgreSQL features, Django 6.0, migrations, testing, and ecosystem libraries
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legal, security, privacy, and deliverability requirements every delivered app must satisfy — legal pages, PII/deletion rights, CSP/Trusted-Types/Zod, AI-agent security, RFC7807 errors, email domain auth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secrets management, XSS prevention, CSRF protection, dependency scanning, DOMPurify sanitization, CSP headers, CODEOWNERS, HttpOnly cookies
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Secure storage, certificate pinning, biometric auth, jailbreak detection, code obfuscation, network security, screenshot prevention for React Native
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tauri 2.x deny-by-default security model, capabilities, permissions, scopes, ACL
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a direct five-axis code review across correctness, security, performance, readability, and maintainability. Use when the user asks for `/review`, PR review, security review, pre-merge review, production readiness review, or blocking issue assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sensitive data patterns for security testing: API keys, credit cards, emails, SSNs, phone numbers, IPs, and more. Use for data discovery and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploit Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in applications hosted on AWS to access the highly sensitive Instance Metadata Service (IMDS). This allows an attacker to steal valid IAM roles and temporary security credentials, leading to catastrophic cloud account compromise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for data poisoning, prompt injection via retrieved documents, and data exfiltration through manipulated context windows. Use this skill when assessing RAG-based chatbots, knowledge bases, enterprise AI assistants, or any system that augments LLM responses with external document retrieval. Covers document injection, embedding manipulation, knowledge base poisoning, and cross-document inference attacks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。