1,514 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frosted glass effect with translucent layers, subtle blur, and luminous borders for depth and modern elegance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Single-track / single-episode music-player mockup template — glassmorphic iOS-Music style player card with ambient album-art wash, for showcasing one song, one podcast episode, or one audio jingle as a shareable interactive surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks for QA planning, execution, review, release assessment, reporting, status, or test-tool recommendations and the correct PWDEV QA workflow must be selected safely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose repository and PWDEV Flow health without changing the project. Use when the user asks for a health check, workspace consistency check, dependency assessment, readiness report, or evidence-based scorecard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user requests to review, analyze, critique, or summarize academic papers, research articles, preprints, or scientific publications. Supports comprehensive structured reviews covering methodology assessment, contribution evaluation, literature positioning, and constructive feedback generation. Trigger on queries involving paper URLs, uploaded PDFs, arXiv links, or requests like "review this paper", "analyze this research", "summarize this study", or "write a peer review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core UI/UX engineering skill for building highly interactive, spatial, weightless, and glassmorphism-based web interfaces using GSAP and 3D CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles BED-format genomic intervals (BED3 through BED12, narrowPeak/broadPeak) and the coordinate-system substrate the whole interval category rests on, with bedtools (CLI) and pybedtools/pyranges/pandas (Python). Covers the 0-based half-open vs 1-based-closed convention boundary and the start-1/end-unchanged conversion, the silent failures (chrom-name mismatch, CRLF, lexicographic-vs-version sort under -sorted), genome/chrom.sizes generation, sorting contracts, BED12 block invariants, validation, makewindows, cross-assembly liftover (liftOver/CrossMap), and BED<->VCF/BAM/FASTA conversion. Use when reading, creating, validating, sorting, lifting between genome builds, or converting interval files, preparing inputs for bedtools/tabix/bigBed, or debugging an off-by-one or empty-overlap result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transfers gene annotations between genome assemblies via coordinate liftover (UCSC liftOver, CrossMap for same-species version updates) or feature/sequence projection (Liftoff for same/close species, miniprot for protein-level cross-species, TOGA/GeMoMa/CAT for distant clades). Covers the coordinate-vs-projection decision by divergence, why a successful lift is not biological confirmation, reference bias, the silent-dropping of unmapped features, build/PAR/MHC/inversion hazards, and transfer-vs-de-novo validation. Use when annotating a new assembly of a species with an existing reference, harmonizing coordinates across builds, or mapping annotations across related species.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect distant homologs using profile and structure-aware methods that go beyond standard BLAST. Use when sequence identity falls into the twilight zone (<35% pairwise), when BLAST fails to find homologs that should exist, when working at metagenomic scale (DIAMOND, MMseqs2), or when structure beats sequence (Foldseek). Covers PSI-BLAST (iterative PSSM), jackhmmer (iterative HMM), HHblits/HHsearch (profile-profile), DIAMOND, MMseqs2, and Foldseek (3Di structural alphabet, van Kempen 2024).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts ADMET properties using ADMETlab 3.0 (119 endpoints with uncertainty), ADMET-AI, DeepChem MolNet, and chemprop D-MPNN with explicit handling of OECD QSAR principles, applicability domain assessment, calibration, hERG/CYP/AMES gold-standard endpoints, and PAINS / Lipinski / Ro5 / Veber / BBB druglikeness filters. Use when filtering compounds for drug-likeness, prioritizing leads by predicted safety, or building an in-house ADMET QSAR model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks how to build + manage direct shipper relationships — moving from spot market to dedicated lanes, customer scoring + credit assessment, contract terms, dedicated capacity agreements, KPI reporting, and how to handle customer disputes. Reference standard customer-carrier contract terms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when a driver has vision in only one eye or significantly reduced vision in one eye. Covers § 391.41 vision standards, monocular driver variance, and depth-perception assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when conducting a self-audit of your DQF library before an FMCSA compliance review. Covers the systematic approach to verifying all 12 documents are current, complete, and properly maintained.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to run an internal audit before FMCSA does. Covers what to check, common gaps, and remediation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about CDL classes (A, B, C), endorsements (H, N, P, S, T, X), required for hazmat / passenger / school bus / tank / triple-trailer operations, what each class is permitted to operate, the TSA Security Threat Assessment for hazmat, and ELDT (Entry-Level Driver Training) requirements. Cite 49 CFR 383.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a carrier asks about disaster recovery (DR) and business continuity planning (BCP) — cyber incident, natural disaster, terminal loss, key-person departure, financial liquidity event, major customer loss, insurance crisis, or fuel supply disruption. Covers risk assessment, continuity strategy, communication plans, and recovery time objectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing recommendation letters, reference letters, or award nominations for students, postdocs, or colleagues. Invoke when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy, comparative statements, or evidence-based character assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。