2,359 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
How the HyperGrok trading desk works as a team of Grok Bots - roles, seats, shared workspace, evidence standard, approval model and handoff format. Use when setting up the desk, when a Bot is unsure who owns something, or when a request does not fit the normal trade lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open, create, read, analyze, edit, or validate Excel/spreadsheet files (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv). Use when the user asks to create, build, modify, analyze, read, validate, or format any Excel spreadsheet, financial model, pivot table, or tabular data file. Covers: creating new xlsx from scratch, reading and analyzing existing files, editing existing xlsx with zero format loss, formula recalculation and validation, and applying professional financial formatting standards. Triggers on 'spreadsheet', 'Excel', '.xlsx', '.csv', 'pivot table', 'financial model', 'formula', or any request to produce tabular data in Excel format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Claude Code (the CC CLI / "clog code") to a new version, or bump the pinned CC version. Use when the user asks to update Claude Code, bump the CC pin, evaluate a new CC release, or says "clog code update". Routes to the canonical, standardized process in docs/reference/cc-compatibility.md — do NOT re-derive the update mechanism by grepping every time. Do NOT use for general "what changed in CC" trivia with no intent to update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounds version-sensitive engineering decisions in authoritative current sources by detecting the installed stack, retrieving official documentation or source, reconciling conflicts, and recording citations and confidence. Use for framework APIs, dependency behavior, standards, compatibility, migrations, or technical recommendations that may have changed. Not for stable project-local logic or broad product discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies C# and .NET backend standards to ASP.NET Core APIs, EF Core, Dapper, and workers. Use when shaping API boundaries, data access, resilience, or observability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defines CC-* code rules and waivers. Use when mapping lint findings to rule IDs or tracking complexity mass, erosion, and verbosity across changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check color contrast ratios against WCAG AA and AAA accessibility standards. Use when the user wants to verify if their color combinations are accessible, check contrast between text and background colors, or audit a palette for accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rapid prototyping workflow. Skips normal standards to quickly validate a game concept or mechanic. Produces throwaway code and a structured prototype report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute Cypher queries against AgentDB's graph backend. Use when the user wants to write a custom traversal that the standard tools don't cover, or when explaining graph state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maximal Marginal Relevance rerank — get diverse top-k instead of redundant top-k. Use when standard search returns 5 near-duplicates, or when you want broader coverage of a topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessing standards, regulatory controls, and legal-document coverage with cited evidence and proposed wording. Use for OWASP/WCAG/SOC2/PCI/HIPAA or ToS/privacy/DPA reviews; not legal advice or code fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a unit using backwards design from desired outcomes through assessment evidence to learning activities. Use when starting a new unit or redesigning an existing one from standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate an external competency framework like DigComp, GreenComp, or ISTE into classroom-ready activities. Use when implementing framework standards in specific teaching contexts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a structured protocol for auditing AI-generated text against Ennis's six CT standards. Use when students need to critically evaluate AI output in any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", and whenever they complain about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use before PRs or when asked for review; interactive mode can fix locally, while mode:agent reports only for pipeline callers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI(ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini 등)가 쓴 한글 텍스트를 "사람이 쓴 글처럼" 윤문해주는 오케스트레이터 스킬. 번역투·영어 인용 과다·기계적 병렬·관용구·피동태 남용·접속사 남발·리듬 균일성·이모지/불릿 과다 등 10대 카테고리 70개 AI 티 패턴을 탐지·분류해 내용은 한 글자도 건드리지 않고 문체·리듬·표현만 자연스러운 한국어로 재작성한다. shim의 route_hint(light|standard|heavy)로 경로를 정해 잘 쓴 글은 1콜, 표준은 2콜, 중증·장문만 3+콜(진단→겨냥 윤문→finalize)로 처리한다. 트리거 — "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 같은 글 자연스럽게", "GPT/ChatGPT 문체", "AI 번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼 윤문", "AI 윤문", "ChatGPT 티 제거", "한글 AI 탐지·윤문", "AI 글 사람처럼", "번역투 제거", "영어 인용 많은 글 윤문", "AI 글 티 안 나게", "휴머나이저", "humanize Korean", "AI detector bypass 한글". 후속 작업 — "특정 카테고리만 다시", "윤문 강도 조정", "장르 바꿔서", "이 문단만", "2차 윤문" 도 모두 이 스킬. 단순 맞춤법·오탈자 교정은 직접 처리, 번역은 번역 스킬, 내용 추가·삭제를 동반한 재작성은 별도 집필 스킬.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check project progress, show context, and route to next action (execute or plan). Use --forensic to append a 6-check integrity audit after the standard report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。