「verification」の検索結果

Create an implementation plan sized to settled work. Use when a multi-step change benefits from sequencing, file targets, and explicit verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference implementation of a v2 CodexKit skill. Copy this folder as a starting point for new skills. Demonstrates all 10 required sections, 4C verification, and the tier-2 folder structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates specific, implementable fixes for every finding in findings.json. Produces code patches (unified diff), configuration changes, dependency updates, and IaC fixes — not generic advice but actual before/after code. Uses the reproduction command from each finding as the verification step: "run this after the fix — it should now fail." Stores remediation data in findings.json so the dashboard shows a Fix button and /gh-export includes the remediation in GitHub issues. Chains from /pentester, /codebase, or any scan skill after findings are produced. Chains into /gh-export for export with remediation included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects insecure network communication in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: cleartext HTTP, TLS misconfiguration, certificate pinning bypass, hostname verification disabled, allowCleartextTraffic, NSAllowsArbitraryLoads, ATS exceptions, custom TrustManager, ALLOW_ALL_HOSTNAME_VERIFIER, TLS 1.0/1.1, weak cipher suites, certificate pinning absent, Network Security Configuration, onReceivedSslError, SSLSocket, OkHttp, NSURL, URLSession, certificate transparency, HSTS, MITM. Covers MASVS-NETWORK-1 (TLS required) and MASVS-NETWORK-2 (certificate validation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects weak reverse engineering and tampering protections in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: root detection bypass, jailbreak detection bypass, Frida detection, debugger detection, anti-debugging, ptrace, sysctl, emulator detection, code obfuscation absent, debug symbols present, get-task-allow, ProGuard disabled, R8 disabled, string encryption, integrity check, file tampering, repackaging, dynamic instrumentation, runtime hook, Magisk hide, Magisk, frida-server, objection bypass, signing verification, apk resign. Covers MASVS-RESILIENCE-1/2/3/4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep OSINT reconnaissance using the MITRE ATT&CK Reconnaissance framework. Email harvesting with SMTP verification, subdomain takeover detection, certificate transparency mining, Shodan/Censys intelligence, Wayback Machine historical analysis, social media profiling, cloud storage enumeration, document metadata extraction, DNS history, credential leak checks, and passive infrastructure mapping. Uses theHarvester, amass, dnsrecon, fierce, dnstwist, dmitry, whatweb, wafw00f, exiftool, metagoofil, smtp-user-enum, swaks, waybackurls, subfinder, and crt.sh. Pure reconnaissance — no active exploitation. Produces: confidence-scored findings, infrastructure diagram, employee roster, email pattern confirmation, subdomain takeover candidates. Chains into /pentester for active testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit weak password reset and change flows via CSRF on reset forms, cross-user password modification by swapping username parameters, token predictability in reset links, reset displaying old password in plaintext (revealing weak storage), missing current-password verification on change forms, and session hijacker lockout via passwordless change. Test with Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP following OWASP Forgot Password Cheat Sheet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal network assessment. VLAN hopping, ARP spoofing detection, broadcast protocol abuse (LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS), network segmentation verification, SNMP enumeration, NFS exposure, router/switch audit, and internal service mapping. Assumes attacker has network access. Uses nmap, arp-scan, nbtscan, snmpwalk, onesixtyone, smbmap, nfs-common, masscan, hping3, and netexec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Algorithm Confusion vulnerabilities in JSON Web Tokens (JWT). This skill details how to bypass signature verification by changing the signing algorithm from asymmetric (RS256) to symmetric (HS256) and using the public key as the symmetric secret.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep API security assessment beyond surface scanning. Covers the full OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023): Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA / IDOR), Broken Authentication, Broken Object Property Level Authorization (mass assignment + excessive data exposure), Unrestricted Resource Consumption, Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA / vertical privilege escalation), Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows, Server-Side Request Forgery via API parameters, Security Misconfiguration, Improper Inventory Management (shadow/zombie/deprecated endpoints, v1/v2 drift), and Unsafe Consumption of third-party APIs. Works across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, SOAP, and MCP servers. Discovers APIs from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, GraphQL introspection, gRPC reflection, .well-known endpoints, JS bundles, and traffic capture. Uses kiterunner, ffuf, schemathesis, restler-fuzzer, openapi-fuzzer, graphql-cop, clairvoyance, batchql, inql, jwt_tool, postman, mitmproxy, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual payloads, commands, and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /codebase when API endpoints are discovered, chains into /web-exploit when classic injection points are found in API parameters, chains into /post-exploit when RCE is achieved, and chains into /ai-redteam when an LLM/AI endpoint is discovered (chat APIs, completion endpoints, RAG search, agentic tool-use, MCP servers).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates implementation of all tasks for a feature using an agent team. Respects task dependencies, runs tasks in correct order, parallelizes independent tasks. Does NOT build, run tests, or commit at any point — verification is delegated to the caller (typically `/start-job`, which runs `build-verify` and `pr-review uncommitted` afterwards). Use when the user says "implement all tasks", "run the task sequence", "implement the feature", or wants to execute multiple tasks from a task list end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing Django authentication - local accounts, OAuth, email verification, MFA, OIDC, django-organizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY deploy after every code change. Typecheck → deploy → purge CDN → E2E on production → visual verify → fix-forward loop. Workers Builds native CI/CD, D1 Time Travel PIT recovery, D1→R2 long-term backups, wrangler rollback, wrangler secrets management, structured observability, cross-browser smoke tests, rollback procedures, and GitHub auto-configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resend email setup, domain verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Webhook patterns — receiving, sending, signature verification, and retry logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-read pinned on-chain facts and watch documentary source fingerprints behind failure scenarios monthly, reporting drift without approving or changing scenario records automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在宣称工作完成、已修复或测试通过之前使用，在提交或创建 PR 之前——必须运行验证命令并确认输出后才能声称成功；始终用证据支撑断言

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run bounded, read-only semantic advisory sidecar passes for candidate mapping, issue triage, upstream diffs, evidence verification triage, and meta audit hints. Enforces monthly spend limits with explicit fallback to worker-luna.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Checks every URL in the evidence data lake for HTTP liveness — catches dead links (404, 403, timeout, connection errors) before evidence is ingested into the registry. Use this skill when running the full /ev-pipeline, asked to "validate links", "check evidence URLs", "run link validation", "find dead links in the data lake", "check HTTP status of evidence sources", or "verify evidence links still work". Wraps validate_sources.py as a temporary coexistence URL-health shim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。