「wants」の検索結果

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc + binscatter. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step Stata pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (use/import, destring, misstable, duplicates, merge assert), (2) variable construction (gen/egen/winsor2/xtile/xtset with L./F./D.), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (tabstat/balancetable/asdoc), (4) classical diagnostic tests (sktest/swilk/hettest/imtest/xtserial/xttest3/vif/dfuller/kpss/hausman/estat overid), (5) baseline modeling (reg/xtreg/reghdfe/ivreg2/ivregress/csdid/did_imputation/eventstudyinteract/sdid/rdrobust/synth/psmatch2/teffects/heckman/qreg/ppmlhdfe), (6) robustness battery (bacondecomp/honestdid/rwolf/ritest/wildbootstrap/oster), (7) further analysis (subgroup/triple-diff/interactions/medsem/marginsplot/binscatter by group), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (esttab/outreg2/estout/coefplot/marginsplot/rdplot/twoway combined). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `teffects ipw` / `teffects ipwra` / `teffects aipw` / `eltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `mrrobust` (IVW / Egger / weighted median) and `mregger` / `mrpresso`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `sts` / `stcox` / `streg` / `strmst2`, E-value sensitivity via `evalue` (Linden-Mathur), principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `ddml` / `pdslasso`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `crforest` and `ddml interactive`, causal forest via `crforest` / `cforest`, BART/BCF via `bart` / `bartCause`-style externals, CATE distribution + policy tree via `crforest`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal externals, fairness audit, DAG learning via `pcalg` / external Python callouts). Use when the user asks for a complete Stata empirical analysis, wants a reproducible .do-file pipeline, needs a Stata counterpart to the Python StatsPAI / Full-empirical-analysis-skill, or names a specific Stata step in isolation ("run reghdfe with two-way clustering", "csdid event study", "winsor2 at 1%", "esttab to LaTeX", "coefplot with CI", "ivreg2 weak-IV test", "synth_runner placebos", "teffects psmatch balance check"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation Stata", "teffects ipw aipw", "eltmle", "mrrobust", "mregger weighted median", "stcox AFT survival", "strmst2", "evalue Stata", "STROBE Stata", "公共健康 Stata", "流行病学 Stata". Mode B triggers on "ddml Stata", "pdslasso", "crforest causal forest Stata", "policy tree Stata", "因果机器学习 Stata".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to create, author, write, or design a new Agent Skill (a SKILL.md) — for OpenKnowledge or for their editors — including requests like 'help me write a skill', 'make a skill that…', 'turn this workflow into a skill', or improving an existing skill's triggering and discipline. Also use when capturing reusable agent guidance that should live as an installable skill rather than a one-off prompt. Covers choosing scope (project vs global), authoring inside a plugin or skills-distribution repo (write in the repo's own layout, never install), the SKILL.md frontmatter contract, progressive-disclosure structure, evaluating the skill, and installing it into the user's editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Promote existing research into a stable-status canonical article under `articles/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when a decision has actually been made and the team wants the source-of-truth written down, or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article. Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice. Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research-with-sources` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running Claude Fable on codebase-heavy or token-heavy work and the user wants Fable to orchestrate research, coding, and testing while cheaper subagents do bounded heavy lifting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to compare, cross-review, merge, judge, choose, or arbitrate competing plans from multiple agents such as Codex and Claude Code; when given two or more proposed plans, session IDs, transcripts, plan documents, PR descriptions, or pasted strategies; or when the user wants one recommended execution plan after agents review each other's proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, forks, authors, validates, publishes, updates, versions, pulls, archives, restores, transfers, and manages co-authors for Observal Agents. Use when the user wants to build or install an Agent, change an Agent definition, publish a draft, release a version, or manage Agent ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any task the organization may already have an approved skill, prompt, MCP server, or Agent for: reviewing code, a commit, a diff, or a pull request; writing tests or documentation; querying a database, API, or service; automating a browser or web page; running untrusted code; connecting to a SaaS tool; drafting, researching, or any other substantive work. The user will not mention Observal: the task type is the trigger. Check what is already installed, then run observal discover search as the first action, before reading the repository or working from scratch. Also use when the user wants to log in, configure Observal, inspect local harness setup, share or open a repository Agent share, manage a teamspace or invitation, process inbox items, check installed registry items, or call an endpoint without a dedicated command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspects Observal traces, sessions, rankings, feedback, telemetry health, logs, and Agent insight reports. Use when the user wants operational evidence, current activity, telemetry diagnosis, ratings, report generation, regression analysis, or recommendations grounded in Agent usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches, recommends, bulk-submits, installs, forks, edits, versions, archives, restores, transfers, and manages co-authors for Observal MCP servers, skills, hooks, prompts, sandboxes, and registered remote A2A agents. Use when the user wants to find components, publish one or many they control, install them into a harness, or manage their lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a GraphQL endpoint, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server into bash CLI commands and a `tools.*` JS API runnable inside `just-bash`'s `js-exec` sandbox. Use when the user wants to expose a remote API to a sandboxed bash agent, build a tool-calling agent on top of just-bash, or generate CLI commands from an existing API spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, install, and debug bb plugins. Use when the user wants a bb plugin, a sidebar panel, a bb CLI subcommand, an agent tool, a theme, a provider, or to extend bb itself. For running threads and the core bb CLI, use bb-cli instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct browser control via CDP. Use when the user wants to automate, scrape, test, or interact with web pages. Connects to the user's already-running Chrome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a holistic regrounding pass on the entire microsoft/apm documentation corpus against current source code, page-by-page, and emit surgical fixes for stale claims. Activate when the maintainer wants a WHOLE-CORPUS audit (not per-PR review) -- typical triggers include "audit the docs", "reground the corpus", "check every page against code", "pre-release docs sweep", "the docs have drifted everywhere", or "we just reshaped the TOC, find dead links". Wave-batched and S7-verified; scales to the full ~112-page corpus in ~10 minutes wall-time. This is a SIBLING to docs-sync, not a replacement: docs-sync is per-PR (triggered by a diff); this skill is per-corpus (triggered by a maintainer ask). They share agent personas, schemas, and the docs index, but their triggers MUST NOT collide. Does NOT auto-merge, does NOT push without maintainer review, and does NOT replace per-PR drift detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and synthesize current AI hotspots into a bilingual HTML daily report. Use when the user says "AI热点", asks for AI日报/AI日报 HTML/AI hot topics, or wants the best recent AI products, papers, viewpoints, and cognition-shifting items from AI/news aggregators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a composable CLI for Codex from API docs, an OpenAPI spec, existing curl examples, an SDK, a web app, an admin tool, or a local script. Use when the user wants Codex to create a command-line tool that can run from any repo, expose composable read/write commands, return stable JSON, manage auth, and pair with a companion skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect GitHub pull requests, issues, workflow runs, and API data with the gh CLI. Use when the user wants repository facts from GitHub without opening the browser, especially for PR status, CI failures, issue lists, or structured JSON output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize menus and visit notes with grounded tasting analysis and comparisons to earlier experiences. Use when the user shares a restaurant menu, wants a tasting write-up, or asks to merge a visit into Notes/Gourmet.md without overwriting earlier visits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and manage guarded Codex App-native or launchd heartbeats for Codex main control threads. Use when the user wants Codex to periodically continue a specific thread only when it is idle, avoid interrupting active work, keep App-visible interactions, inspect thread status, or enable/disable project autopilot heartbeats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Locate and read a Codex thread by a codex thread link, thread id, or rollout path across all local CODEX_HOME directories (~/.codex, ~/.codex-gpt, ...). Use when the user pastes a codex:// link, asks to understand the 前因后果 of a Codex session, wants a timeline of what a long-running main thread did, or needs to search / export a past Codex conversation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。