1.5万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
**Run FIRST (before any other skill or task)** when workspace root has no AGENTS.md and the repo is an AEM Cloud Service project. Creates AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md (tailored via pom.xml). Applies on every user request until AGENTS.md exists — not only the first chat. Never overwrites existing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert per-page styled HTML prototypes (stardust under stardust/prototypes/**, or claude-design / Mobirise / Relume / Lovable / v0 / Figma-derived pages, or JSX prototypes pre-rendered to HTML, often under samples/) into Edge Delivery Services (EDS / AEM) blocks and content pages, then deploy via DA. Each prototype section becomes one EDS block; the prototype's per-section CSS becomes that block's CSS scoped under the block class. Use when the user wants to lift styled per-page HTML prototypes into a working EDS site under blocks/ and content/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates new Claude Code skills following repository conventions with proper structure, frontmatter, workflows, code examples, and reference files. Use when users request "create a skill", "new skill", "generate skill", or "add skill to collection".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding or updating Spark AI provider models or their compact and preflight metrics, especially baidu-oneapi, Grok, Claude, GPT, DeepSeek, OneAPI, context windows, output budgets, prices, thinking maps, or transports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when AI contribution metadata must match the actual workflow, when model alias and dated identifiers need auditing, when verified and fabricated citation counts feed a release decision, or when a venue's AI disclosure statement needs evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adapting academic findings for a public audience (op-ed, social post, podcast) and the simplification must stay evidence-faithful, avoid overclaiming, respect embargoes, and disclose AI assistance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authorship order, CRediT contribution roles, or AI-assistance attribution must be recorded transparently for a manuscript, when an author dispute needs an evidence trail, or before a contributorship statement is required at submission; this skill maintains the human-attribution ledger of who contributed what and in which role (authorship order, CRediT taxonomy, revision responsibilities), which is distinct from the disclosure-metadata audit owned by ai-disclosure-auditor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a complete research workflow — its instructions, skills, data boundaries, and tool connections — must be assessed for portability across AI agents or environments, so each component is explicitly mapped before migration rather than assumed to transfer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when serving as a peer reviewer and deciding whether and how AI may assist, when a manuscript under review must never be pasted into an external tool, or when a confidentiality-preserving review and disclosure are needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a high-stakes analysis, citation set, or decision should be checked by a second independent AI agent that verifies rather than decides, or when disagreement between agents must be surfaced for the human to adjudicate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before a tag, GitHub release, or Zenodo archive, when README, CATALOG, CHANGELOG, CITATION.cff, the disclosure aggregate, and skill discovery must agree, or when a go or no-go release verdict needs recorded evidence behind it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a source must be reached through DergiPark, ULAKBIM TR Dizin, HEAL-Link, YOK Thesis Center, or an institutional library route, when off-campus access fails, or when a lawful retrieval plan is needed for Turkish, Greek, or European materials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing or configuring MCP servers for research work, when a literature, reference manager, or scholarly search server needs a trust check before installation, or when an existing research tool stack needs a data flow and permission audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a study's materials, data, code, or preprint need an open-science release: license choice, a persistent DOI (Zenodo/OSF), README and metadata, and an access-and-embargo decision that respects ethics constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coding interviews, focus groups, or open-ended responses with AI assistance, when a codebook needs building or auditing, when intercoder reliability must be computed, or when qualitative quotes need integrity checks before publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing a course, assessment, or student-feedback workflow and deciding where AI assistance is acceptable, when grading or feedback must stay within academic-integrity and FERPA/KVKK boundaries, or when AI-use rules for students need stating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a systematic, scoping, or rapid review needs a reproducible pipeline: protocol framing (PICO/SPIDER/PCC), a logged search string, title/abstract and full-text screening with recorded exclusion reasons, and PRISMA flow counts, with the human as the deciding screener.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when selecting a statistical test with AI consultation, when assumptions need checking against the actual data, when an analysis plan or decision log must be written before running anything, or when results need APA-style reporting with effect sizes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a study needs a preregistration or a frozen analysis plan, when confirmatory and exploratory analyses must be separated, or when every deviation from the registered plan must be logged before the result is reported.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a draft in Turkish, English, or both reads as AI-generated and needs revision that removes machine writing patterns and translation calques while preserving meaning, citations, statistics, and the author's voice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authoring a new manuscript, thesis chapter, or abstract from scratch in Turkish and English in parallel — building the claim skeleton first, then drafting Turkish and re-authoring English — not for auditing parity between existing versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before sensitive, clinical, identifying, or raw interview data is placed in front of an AI tool, when transcripts or student materials need de-identification, or when a data-minimization gate must run before any analysis or drafting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。