「aso」の検索結果

Discover which AI prompts and topics matter for a brand's Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) using only free tools. Crawls a website, analyzes the brand's positioning, generates prioritized prompts people ask AI assistants, and audits existing content coverage — all without paid APIs. Use when a user wants to: find what questions people ask AI about their industry, discover AEO opportunities, research prompts for content creation, audit a site's AI visibility, or build an AEO content strategy. No API keys required — uses web_fetch, web_search (free tier), and LLM reasoning only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or refresh AEO-optimized content that gets cited by AI assistants (Gemini, ChatGPT, Perplexity) using only free tools. Two modes: CREATE new content targeting a specific prompt, or REFRESH existing content to improve AI citation-worthiness. Researches what AI models currently cite, builds a competitive brief, and produces citation-worthy content. Use when a user wants to: write content optimized for AI citations, create articles that show up in AI answers, refresh/update existing content for better AI visibility, build authority content for answer engines, or produce AEO content without paid tools. No API keys required — uses web_fetch, web_search (free tier), and LLM reasoning only. Pairs with aeo-prompt-research-free (which identifies WHAT to write about; this skill handles HOW to write or refresh it).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dr. Kaia Chen - AI Architect, mentor, and strategic advisor for Marcus. Use when the user says "Kaia", "Dr. Chen", "ask Kaia", "/kaia", or wants architectural advice, trade-off analysis, production readiness guidance, mentorship, a voice of reason, or a second opinion on design decisions. Kaia grounds her advice in the actual codebase (via Chen MCP tools) and research literature, and logs important decisions and insights via Simon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or update a GEODE model or provider from current primary documentation and repository call-site evidence. Use for model IDs, context limits, pricing, reasoning controls, provider routes, capability gates, or fallback changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground GEODE design and evaluation work in Stanford CS329A Parts 2 and 5. Use for test-time compute, planning, multi-step reasoning, deep research, LATS, independent subplans, best-of-N, repair depth, measurement replication, verifier authority, and GEODE/Eco²/SIL/Crucible comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor code units whose size or mixed responsibilities impede understanding, testing, or change. Use when recent work makes a function, class, or module materially harder to reason about.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genera las vistas estáticas navegables del producto (landing, auth, app, legales, errores y las propias del mapa de pantallas) usando el design system de design/, sin lógica de backend. Úsalo en el paso "prototipar" del sprint de definición o cuando haya que maquetar vistas nuevas (p. ej. "haz el prototipo", "maqueta las vistas", "crea la landing estática").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当AI智能体需要处理以下情形时触发本技能： 1. 当前案件/问题在现行法律中没有直接、明确的规定（法律漏洞）； 2. 需要参考已有判例、相似案件或相近法律规范来推导当前问题的处理方案； 3. 用户明确要求"参照""比照""类推适用"某一规范或案例； 4. 在法律论证中需要以"相似案件相似处理"（Like cases should be treated alike）原则支撑结论； 5. 需要评估两个或多个案件/规范之间的相似性与差异性，以判断能否进行类比； 6. 在合同解释、侵权责任认定、行政处罚裁量等场景中，需要借助类似情形的处理经验形成论证。 本技能的核心是：识别相似性基础（tertium comparationis），论证类比的正当性，并在此基础上得出合理的法律结论。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a court-ready ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint under Title I (employment, 42 U.S.C. § 12112) or Title III (public accommodations, 42 U.S.C. § 12182). Structures jurisdiction, EEOC exhaustion, factual allegations, causes of action, and relief. Use when drafting ADA disability discrimination complaints, reasonable accommodation pleadings, or civil rights complaints for plaintiffs with disabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured step-by-step reasoning before acting, to avoid guessing. For complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis checks. NOT for being stuck on approach (mk:problem-solving).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured second-pass reasoning after a review or plan verdict: pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic lens, etc. NOT for initial review (mk:review) or new plans (mk:plan-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stuck on approach (not debugging). Strategic unsticking via 7 non-default techniques: simplification cascades, collision-zone thinking, meta-pattern recognition, inversion, scale game, first principles, via negativa. Triggers on complexity spiraling, innovation block, recurring patterns across domains, forced-assumption solutions, scale uncertainty, told-it's-impossible, or bloated systems needing subtraction. For evidence-based root-cause debugging, use mk:sequential-thinking instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document-driven workflow for implementing, reviewing, and verifying Chisel processor and memory-subsystem RTL. Use when Codex must work from maintained Architecture and Design, trace a complete integration surface, reason in synthesized-hardware terms, keep source-adjacent _codex.md summaries current, avoid redundant or overprotective logic, or run focused functional verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heuristic search-based temporal planning and scheduling for complex multi-constraint environments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert landscape designer transforming yards through photo mapping, 3D visualization, seasonal planning, and deep plant knowledge. Specializes in fast-growing privacy screens (knows arborvitae pitfalls), architecture-appropriate design, outdoor living spaces, and realistic maintenance expectations. Activate on "landscape design", "yard design", "garden planning", "plant selection", "privacy screen", "outdoor living", "backyard makeover", "arborvitae", "hedge", "fast growing tree", "landscaping ideas". NOT for interior design (use interior-design-expert), hardscape construction (consult contractors), or lawn care chemicals (consult local experts).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-travel debugging for DAG executions. Inspect agent state at any node, replay decisions with modified inputs, compare execution traces side-by-side, and identify where reasoning diverged. Inspired by LangGraph Studio's state-editing model and Temporal's event history. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "time travel debug", "inspect node state", "what went wrong at step", "compare runs", "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic image-text matching with CLIP and alternatives. Use for image search, zero-shot classification, similarity matching. NOT for counting objects, fine-grained classification (celebrities, car models), spatial reasoning, or compositional queries. Activate on "CLIP", "embeddings", "image similarity", "semantic search", "zero-shot classification", "image-text matching".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。