9,832 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Manages government affairs, public policy communications, and collective action aligned with B Corp GACA standards. Creates policy position papers, advocacy communications, regulatory response documents, and transparent lobbying reports. Use when user asks about government relations, public policy, advocacy, lobbying, regulatory affairs, collective action, or political engagement transparency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess bounded Codex software development requests before choosing direct work or TaskBelay, then prepare confirmed TaskBelay Tasks in new local branches by default, current branches, or dedicated Git worktrees. It may be selected implicitly or explicitly with $taskbelay-codex:taskbelay; the selector never skips assessment. Explicit Task resume and receipt-backed confirmed bootstrap bypass duplicate assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantiza LLMs para 8-bit ou 4-bit com redução de memória de 50-75% e perda mínima de acurácia. Use quando a memória GPU é limitada, precisa ajustar modelos maiores ou quer inferência mais rápida. Suporta formatos INT8, NF4, FP4, treinamento QLoRA e otimizadores 8-bit. Funciona com HuggingFace Transformers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever the project must support speech input or voice control — dictation, "click by voice" grammars, Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Voice Control (iOS/macOS), Voice Access (Android), or any interface where users activate controls by speaking. Under no circumstances let an aria-label override a visible label without keeping the visible text intact and in order. Absolutely always ensure the accessible name contains the visible label, and load alongside keyboard/SKILL.md since speech tools commonly emulate keyboard and pointer input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linearに大きなタスクを複数のIssueに分割して作成する際に使用。新しいプロジェクトを作成し、その中にフラットなIssueを作成し、依存関係はblockedByリレーションで表現する。
Test authentication and session management controls for bypass and account takeover scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools. Use this skill when users want to create bug reports, feature requests, or task issues, update existing issues, add labels/assignees/milestones, manage repository labels, set issue fields (dates, priority, custom fields), set issue types, manage issue workflows, link issues, add dependencies, or track blocked-by/blocking relationships. Triggers on requests like "create an issue", "file a bug", "request a feature", "update issue X", "set the priority", "set the start date", "create a label", "rename a label", "list repo labels", "link issues", "add dependency", "blocked by", "blocking", or any GitHub issue management task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor given method `${input:methodName}` to reduce its cognitive complexity to `${input:complexityThreshold}` or below, by extracting helper methods. Use when a method exceeds a cognitive-complexity threshold flagged by a linter or review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code speed, reduce bundle/image size, improve test pass rate, optimize prompts, improve content quality (headlines, copy, CTR), or run any measurable improvement loop. Requires: a target file, an evaluation command that outputs a metric, and a git repo
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brutally honest AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md review backed by real A/B test evidence. Not just opinions — actual proof that your rules are dead weight. Roasts instruction files for bloat, slop, and redundancy, then proves it by running evals. Use when user says "roast my agents.md", "roast my CLAUDE.md", "prove my rules are useless", "eval roast", or wants entertaining evidence-based feedback on their AI config files. Also triggers on "audit my instructions" or "are my rules helping".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton mental model for someone who has never seen this repo — what "layer" means (two different things), the two-halves rule, the three app.config registries, team-scoped multi-tenancy, manifest-driven field types, the numbered invariants with the incidents behind them, and the known-weak points. Use when orienting in this codebase for the first time, when a question is shaped like "how does crouton work / why is it built this way / where does X live", when deciding whether a change belongs in a package or a generated layer, when confused by an extends chain or by croutonApps/croutonCollections/croutonLayoutBlocks, or before proposing any structural change. Trigger phrases: "what is a crouton layer", "package vs generated layer", "how does multi-tenancy work here", "why is there a stub component", "where do field types come from", "what invariants must hold".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-test plans before committing by imagining they've already failed. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full pre-mortem session — vivid failure scene-setting, six failure categories, the monkey test, and concrete plan adjustments. Review mode checks previous findings monthly for changed probabilities and new failure modes. Alert Triggers mode defines and monitors early warning signals across four trigger categories. Use before any major commitment — strategy, investment, product launch, partnership — or regularly to keep assumptions honest. The planning fallacy is real. The spreadsheet looked great so everyone stopped thinking. This is the antidote. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continuous environmental scanning across six PESTEL categories — Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal. Not a one-time analysis but an ongoing radar. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full scan and prioritises forces by impact, speed, and reversibility. Review mode checks the watch list monthly for movement and new signals. Alert mode defines concrete monitoring triggers for each top force. Use whenever someone wants to understand external forces acting on their business, assess macro risk, prepare for planning, or check whether the world has moved since last time they looked. Connects to the strategy map (forces act on the chain) and Wardley Map (forces drive component evolution). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
吉里吉里Z (krkrz) の -replweb HTTP+SSE サーバ (WebServer クラス) にブラウザ UI を載せて、本体アプリの操作/編集/観測パネルをブラウザ側に組み込む方法論。ゲーム本体は 3D 表示やゲーム内 UI に専念させ、編集ツール・インスペクター・ダッシュボード・REPL コンソールをブラウザ (別ウィンドウ/別PC) から使う構成を作るときに読む。プラグインや TJS がサーバへエンドポイントを追加公開する手順 (WebServer.register / serveStatic / broadcast)、ハンドラ呼び出し規約 (req %[method,path,query,body,bytes] → 文字列/octet/整数/辞書)、状態同期パターン (fetch POST + SSE /sub push + throttle + 差分/tick 配信)、既存 REPL コンソール (/events + /cmd) の UI 埋め込み、ブラウザのアプリモード起動 (Chromium --app / -webui)、json.dll 連携、TJS2 由来のハマりどころ (ローカル関数クロージャ不在→クラス化 / ブロックコメントのネスト誤爆 / startup 例外の致命性 / ハンドラは必ずメインスレッド実行) を網羅。エンジン側 WebServer クラスそのものの仕様は krkrz core doc/REPL.md、REPL/Agent 駆動は skill krkrz-repl、Elements ネイティブ UI は skill elements、TJS2 言語は skill tjs2、本体 API は skill krkrz を参照。
Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous experiment loop that optimizes any file by a measurable metric. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. The agent edits a target file, runs a fixed evaluation, keeps improvements (git commit), discards failures (git reset), and loops indefinitely. Use when: user wants to optimize code spe...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect privilege escalation attempts including token manipulation, UAC bypass, unquoted service paths, kernel exploits, and sudo/doas abuse across Windows and Linux.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and prevent QR code phishing (quishing) attacks that bypass traditional email security by embedding malicious URLs in QR code images within emails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect bootkits such as BlackLotus and Bootkitty and Secure Boot bypass via DBX and binary checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts authorized wireless network penetration tests to assess the security of WiFi infrastructure by testing for weak encryption protocols, captive portal bypasses, evil twin attacks, WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture, rogue access point detection, and client-side attacks. The tester evaluates wireless authentication, network segmentation, and the effectiveness of wireless intrusion detection systems. Activates for requests involving wireless pentest, WiFi security assessment, WPA2/WPA3 testing, or rogue access point detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。