1,669 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orquestração multi-nuvem para workloads de ML com otimização automática de custos. Use quando precisar executar treinamento ou jobs em lote em múltiplas nuvens, aproveitar instâncias spot com auto-recuperação ou otimizar custos de GPU entre provedores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to MEASURE this repo instead of eyeballing it — interpret the loop-station context-budget trend (history.jsonl, thresholds, the tokenizer-switch gotcha), read a session trace, use the eval ledger (cost-per-success), and pick the right evidence tool (app-shots, smoke-deployed, db-counts, --check modes). Use when asked "is the harness bloating", "how big is CLAUDE.md really", "did this agent run actually succeed", "prove this works", "what evidence do we have", or when tempted to declare a capability (browser, tool) unavailable. For RUNNING the loop-station scripts, defer to the loop-station skill — this skill is interpretation + the wider evidence toolkit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
任意のアプリのコードベースを解析して LLM API 呼び出し箇所を洗い出し、「1 回の処理(フロー)で どれだけのトークン/費用がかかるか」「N 件・DAU 規模でいくらか」を根拠付きで試算するスキル。 プロンプト/ツール定義/RAG/エージェントループ/キャッシュ/思考トークンまで合算し、無料 or 確認付き 有料の実測でグラウンディングする。成果物は Markdown レポート + 対話 HTML 計算機 + コスト JSON。 「このアプリの API コストはいくら」「モデル別/件数別の費用」「LLM の ROI 試算」「トークン数を数えて」 「1リクエストいくら」等で起動。既定スタックの必須スキルではない optional 群であり、AI 機能を含む要件で明示された場合、 または app-orchestrator が v1 前・AI 機能変更時の試算として指示した場合のみロードする。
Lightweight multi-agent research orchestration using one coordinator, three domain leads, and three lightweight research agents. Use for medium-size research, market scans, competitor comparisons, prior-art style exploration, report planning, and any task that benefits from parallel domain decomposition without running a full high-cost research lab.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for scaling read-heavy Convex apps to millions of users. Use when optimizing bandwidth, reducing query costs, fixing slow queries, creating digest tables, replacing reactive subscriptions with one-shot fetches, adding compound indexes, debouncing writes, rate-controlling backfills, or running npx convex insights. Trigger when users mention "scale", "bandwidth", "performance", "optimize", "slow queries", "expensive queries", "digest table", "denormalize", or "thundering herd" in the context of Convex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end orchestrator: from a business idea, app idea, or existing app to running Azure deployment with cost estimates and pre-deploy approval. Analyzes your app, auto-detects the right Azure services, scaffolds infrastructure code, and deploys — tailored to your app, not a template.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You know AI wrappers get a bad rap, but the good ones solve real problems. You build products where AI is the engine, not the gimmick. You understand prompt engineering is product development. You balance costs with user experience. You create AI products people actually pay for and use daily.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate autonomous AI development pipelines through your Kanban board (Asana, GitHub Projects, Linear). Manages multi-worker Claude Code dispatch, deterministic quality gates, adversarial review, per-task cost tracking, and crash-proof pipeline execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous DevSecOps & FinOps Guardrails. Orchestrates Gemini 3 Flash to audit Linux Kernel patches, Terraform cost drifts, and K8s compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, create, and configure production-ready Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) clusters. Covers Day-0 checklist, SKU selection (Automatic vs Standard), networking options (private API server, Azure CNI Overlay, egress configuration), security, and operations (autoscaling, upgrade strategy, cost anal...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill teaches security teams how to detect and respond to unauthorized cryptocurrency mining operations in cloud environments. It covers identifying cryptomining indicators through compute usage anomalies, network traffic patterns to mining pools, GuardDuty CryptoCurrency findings, and runtime process monitoring on EC2, ECS, EKS, and Azure Automation workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational readiness checklist (security, cost, legal, data design, performance, incident response, LLM integration defenses) applied when a change touches deployment, infrastructure, external services, secrets, or user data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate formal IT/hardware purchase request documents from informal requirements. Use when creating purchase justifications, cost-benefit analyses, ROI calculations, vendor comparisons, or MARP presentation slides for management approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap a new or existing project with a small, file-based documentation system so Claude Code keeps context, lessons, and decisions across session restarts instead of starting cold every time. Sets up a handful of markdown files under .claude/ (standing rules, a free-form note to your next session, a phased roadmap, a prioritized backlog, and searchable history/changelog archives) sized and split so the files read every session stay small while the archives grow without ever costing context. Use this whenever someone is starting a new project and asks how to structure it for long-running AI-assisted work, wants Claude to "remember" things between sessions without relying on chat history, asks for a CLAUDE.md + backlog + changelog setup, mentions "session continuity", "persistent context", "project memory system", or is retrofitting an existing codebase that has no such system yet. Also use to explain or extend an already-bootstrapped bottle system (add a rule, start the archival script, add a new backlog section).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, evaluating, documenting, modernizing, reviewing, refactoring, or implementing software architecture and code-level structure, including requirements, context, architecture style selection, microservices patterns, WebAssembly/WASI/Component Model, UMA portable capabilities, runtime contracts, capability graphs, governed MCP/agent orchestration, clean code, code smells, Rust crate/library API architecture, Cargo feature/MSRV/SemVer policy, unsafe/FFI/no_std/library testing, modularity, views, NFR tactics, IAM/auth, security patterns, cost estimation, architecture-as-code fitness functions, ADR/RFC work, and engineering execution plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work through which package to add for a capability, and what each option costs — maintenance, licence, bundle weight, transitive risk, and whether the platform already does it. Use when someone needs a library for a job and has not picked one yet, when weighing two candidates, or when a package looks convenient but unmaintained.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Codex provider rollout JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to identify slow or failed individual tasks, tool retries, token/cost anomalies, and differences in agent execution paths. Use when users ask to analyze a Codex session or rollout, explain why a Codex task was slow or failed, inspect a Codex provider execution trace, compare Codex runs, count function_call or tool output events, or investigate agent-home/.codex/sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。