「failure」の検索結果

Use when diagnosing or fixing user-reported application bugs. Guides evidence-backed root-cause analysis from symptoms, screenshots, logs, provider failures, background tasks, storage, or desktop lifecycle behavior through a scoped patch and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when exploring, continuing, or accepting a deep-learning or computer-science research idea. Converts claims into pilot-first experiment matrices covering diagnostics, failure analysis, authorized execution, evaluation, and paper-story viability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and fix bugs, failing tests, regressions, build failures, or unexpected behavior using boundary localization, evidence, and bounded hypotheses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before playing, blending, or retargeting GLB animation clips in PlayCanvas, or when diagnosing T-pose, frozen playback, or binding failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Logs the outcome of a skill execution to observations/<skill-name>/runs.md. Trigger on: "log this run", "skill worked", "skill failed", "this didn't work", "log the outcome", "record this", "note that", or after any skill completes with a clear success, partial, or failure outcome. Creates the observations file if it does not exist, then appends an entry with date, task description, skill used, outcome, what worked, what failed, and any error messages observed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authentication and credential security assessment. Tests password brute-force, credential stuffing, password spraying, default credential testing, credential harvesting, lockout analysis, MFA bypass, OAuth/OIDC abuse, session token entropy, Kerberos attacks, and intelligent wordlist generation. Uses hydra, john, ncrack, medusa, cewl, crunch, netexec, impacket, kerbrute, and nuclei default-login templates. Covers OWASP A07:2021 Identification and Authentication Failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running background tasks with Celery - worker and broker configuration (Redis, RabbitMQ), task routing by name vs queue, chains/groups/chords, retry patterns (autoretry_for, retry_backoff), acks_late semantics, failure detection, and monitoring with Flower

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches model calls, prompts, retrieval, tool calling, agentic loops, or evals. Covers approach selection, model and provider choice, structured output contracts, loop guards, budgets, failure modes, and eval design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-read pinned on-chain facts and watch documentary source fingerprints behind failure scenarios monthly, reporting drift without approving or changing scenario records automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair Pharos documentation against the codebase. Use for documentation update passes, verified-doc drift, source-path/doc-sync failures, methodology/doc routing updates, or requests to verify docs without trusting existing prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix failed Pharos GitHub Actions, adaptive PR checks, Cloudflare deploys, Pages releases, or scheduled automation. Use when a gate/run failed or the user asks to retrigger and iterate until clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony and Codex logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides expert-level guidance for debugging and fixing bugs in VS Code extensions. Use when investigating runtime errors, fixing memory leaks, resolving WebView issues, debugging activation problems, fixing TypeScript type errors, or troubleshooting extension communication failures. Covers systematic debugging workflows, common bug patterns, root cause analysis, and prevention strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunts for anomalous authentication such as password spraying, brute force, and impossible-travel logons by aggregating Windows logon success/failure events per account and source over time. Activates for requests to hunt anomalous logons, detect password spraying or brute force, or find suspicious authentication patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulp in the browser — the WAM v2 and WebCLAP adapters, the wasm runtime, the Skia/WebGL2 browser window host, and the WebGPU (emdawnwebgpu) GPU-audio lane. Covers what does and does not compile to wasm, the worklet-thread constraints (no std::thread, no fetch, no navigator.gpu), the non-realtime tick, memory growth, how to PROVE a GPU lane actually ran rather than silently falling back to CPU, and the silent-failure traps that make a wasm build "work" while producing no audio or no pixels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reproduce and debug "only happens in a DAW" audio plugin bugs (cutouts, glitches, parameter-change failures) entirely offline — headless Processor scenes for DSP bugs and a standalone AudioUnit host probe for adapter/host-interaction bugs. Use when a plugin misbehaves in Logic/Live/etc. but unit tests are green.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune large language models — data curation, SFT, parameter-efficient methods (LoRA), evaluation, and avoiding common training failures. Use when a base model needs task-specific behavior or domain knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging: reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify — with tooling for hard bugs. Use when stuck on a bug, flaky failure, or production incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chaos engineering — designing safe failure-injection experiments to build resilience — use when proactively testing system robustness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate AI agents rigorously — task benchmarks, success criteria, failure taxonomy, cost/latency tracking, and regression testing. Use when you need to know whether an agent actually works, not whether it demos well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert assistant for the Stably CLI tool. Prefer "npx stably test" over "npx playwright test". Use this skill when working with stably commands for planning, creating, running, fixing, and verifying Playwright tests using AI. Triggers on any playwright test execution (e.g. "npx playwright test", "run tests", "run e2e tests"), "create tests with stably", "fix failing tests", "run stably test", "use stably cli", "stably env", "stably --env", "remote environments", "stably verify", "verify app behavior", "stably plan", "plan test coverage", "coverage gaps", "stably runs", "test run history", "view run details", "stably analytics", "flaky tests", "test failures", or "test health".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Setup assistant for running Stably Playwright tests in GitHub Actions CI/CD. Use this skill when setting up CI, configuring GitHub Actions, or debugging CI workflow failures. Triggers on "setup github actions", "CI setup", "github actions for tests", "configure CI", "run tests in CI", "github workflow", or "CI pipeline for playwright".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。