1,716 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Azure AI Text Analytics SDK for sentiment analysis, entity recognition, key phrases, language detection, PII, and healthcare NLP. Use for natural language processing on text. Triggers: "text analytics", "sentiment analysis", "entity recognition", "key phrase", "PII detection", "TextAnalyticsClien...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit websites for SEO, performance, security, technical, content, and 15 other issue cateories with 230+ rules using the squirrelscan CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores, broken links, meta tag analysis, and actionable recommendations. Use to discover and asses website o...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Host security hardening and risk-tolerance configuration for SolanaOS deployments. Use when a user asks for security audits, firewall/SSH/update hardening, risk posture, exposure review, SolanaOS cron scheduling for periodic checks, or version status checks on a machine running SolanaOS (laptop, workstation, Pi, VPS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodic repository health check — install, full validation, unused-code scan, outdated/vulnerable dependencies, and docs drift — ending in a concise report and, when there are safe fixes, a single PR. Designed to run unattended from a scheduled routine; also usable on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
インフラメトリクスの定期調査を体系的に実施し、サービスの健全性を評価する。2層アプローチで11カテゴリのメトリクスを確認し、構造化レポートを作成する。定期的なサービス監視、障害予兆の検出、パフォーマンス評価に使用する。Do NOT use for 個別インシデントの根本原因分析（incident-rcaを使用すること）。
Typosquat and malicious-package detection across installed dependencies (or a single prospective addition) — cross-checks AI-malware family intelligence, package-name similarity to known popular packages, low maintainer-health signals. Use when auditing a freshly-onboarded repo, vetting a single suspicious package, gating CI on supply-chain risk, or investigating an incident.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture design and governance protocol for system structure, boundaries, contracts, APIs, schemas, migrations, rewrites, and long-lived codebase health. Use when designing or reviewing architecture, planning structural refactors or migrations, governing tech debt, or containing rewrite risk. Keeps the load-bearing spine small, owned, checked, and deletable over time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate App Store submission readiness, submit prepared versions, and monitor review status with current asc commands. Use when shipping or troubleshooting review submissions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the SD-22 DMSMS Guidebook (DSPO, FY24 working draft). Use for managing Diminished Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) and obsolescence across a long-lived system's life cycle: the five-step process (Prepare, Identify, Assess, Analyze, Implement) plus the Strategize overlay; standing up a DMSMS Management Team (DMT) and Management Plan (DMP); risk-based monitoring and surveillance (the risk cube, predictive tools, vendor surveys, GIDEP/DLA PDNs, critical-materials analysis); health assessments and resolution timing; costing and selecting resolutions (life-of-need buys, substitutes, redesign, technology refreshment) by AoA/BCA; and budgeting/executing resolutions through modification funding and the ECP process. Defense-sustainment / DoD-acquisition framing throughout. Does NOT teach general systems engineering, parts-management standards, or contracting law in depth, and does not reproduce DoD policy text or the source's tables and figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base synthesized from the Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) v2.14 by the BKCASE Project. Use for the established systems-engineering canon: SE fundamentals and foundations (systems science, systems thinking, the systems approach, modelling/MBSE), the life cycle (ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288/24748/24774 process, development & agile approaches, model selection/tailoring), technical management, concept definition, architecture/realization (the Vee), V&V, maintenance/sustainment, SE standards, and the application contexts (product, service, enterprise, systems-of-systems, healthcare), plus enabling SE (business/team/individual), related disciplines, quality attributes/specialty engineering, implementation examples, and emerging knowledge. Good for grounding background, vocabulary, and prior-art positions across all eight SEBoK Parts. SCOPE LIMITS: this pack is SEBoK v2.14 only (released 2026-05-18); it synthesizes and signposts rather than reproducing the source — it does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE standard text, is a curated guide (not a complete textbook), and is thin on AI-integration depth (Part 8 is a staging area, not settled practice). LICENCE: content is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 — non-commercial use only, attribution to the BKCASE Project required, share-alike obligations carry forward.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standard-Gerüst für rotierende Pipeline-Checks: Pro Lauf genau ein Ziel aus einer Menge (Projekte, Ordner, Repos) wählen — bevorzugt das am längsten ungeprüfte —, den Check durchführen, Ergebnis in einer Check-Registry und einem Verlaufslog festhalten. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn ein wiederkehrender Check über viele Projekte verteilt werden soll („prüfe regelmäßig alle X auf Y"), wenn eine Automatisierung Doppelprüfungen vermeiden muss, wenn eine Check-Registry/CHECKS-LOG-Struktur angelegt oder benutzt wird, oder wenn eine periodische Qualitätsrunde (Quellencheck, Style-Check, Health-Check, Audit) über eine Pipeline fair verteilt werden soll.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ordnet freiwillig bereitgestellte Gesundheitsinformationen und bereitet Fragen für Fachpersonen vor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a RAID log (risks, assumptions, issues, dependencies) line by line and returns a DRAFT review pack: which entries are stale, overdue, duplicated, ownerless, incomplete or misfiled, why, and a proposed update per line as current text against proposed text with the decision the project manager must take. Never re-rates, closes, merges or edits the log. Use when the user asks to "review the RAID log", "clean up the risk log", "health-check the RAID log before the steering meeting", "which risks are stale", "find duplicate risks" or "refresh the issue log". Do not use for setting up a new RAID log or logging a single new risk, issue or decision, use project-status-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews one deal's notes and timeline (CRM opportunity record, activity log, emails, meeting notes, forecast entries) for risk signals such as a single contact thread, no identified budget owner, slipped or missing dates, silence after a proposal, an undefined decision process or a competitor named late, and returns a DRAFT risk register: each signal with the quoted evidence and its date, a severity on a stated scale, and one proposed next action with an owner role for the user to decide on. Use when the user asks to "review the risks on this deal", "why is this opportunity stalling", "is this deal single-threaded", "deal health check before the forecast call" or "what should we do next on <opportunity>". Do not use for a whole-account plan, use account-plan-builder instead; for scoring early leads against a rubric use lead-qualification-scorer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose or enable Session Cartographer semantic search in Codex, including least-privilege localhost access to local Qdrant and the embedding server. Use when setup, Qdrant health, localhost reachability, sandbox network denial, or semantic indexing is in question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FastAPI service setup: app/main.py, API routers, pydantic-settings, lifespan/app.state services, middleware, health checks, pytest/TestClient, Uvicorn, Gunicorn/uvicorn-worker, Docker/Compose. Use for scaffolding or modernizing Python API services; skip for Flask/Django-only, frontend-only, non-Python APIs, or Supabase-specific work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up and operate screenpipe from the terminal, including always-on recording, service modes, capture health, storage, local search, pipes, and connections. Use when the user asks to install, run, inspect, query, automate, or debug screenpipe without relying on the desktop app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read the system-architect map: a deterministic catalog of everything the setup is made of (vault, import scripts, scheduled tasks, MCP servers, SQLite databases, hooks, skills, dashboards), what is healthy and what fell off. Consult it before changing shared infrastructure and re-scan after. Triggers: "/arch", "/arch broken", "/arch scan", "what broke in the system".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health-check the second brain so failures are not silent: is the local search server alive, is the RAG index fresh, is the session-memory ledger filling, did the nightly distillation run. Read-only, with a green/red verdict per component. Triggers: "/brain", "/memory", "is the reindex alive".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover a session after a hard crash (app died, machine rebooted, context lost mid-work): replay the turn-state ledger for the last requests, files and decisions, run a green/red health ping over the system map, file sync and MCP connectors, then rebuild the previous session history for pickup. Triggers: "/1", "resume after crash", "wake".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, inspect, and record SIPS-owned Memory Fabric lessons. Use when a task needs prior lessons, recurring-fix memory, recall health, scoped historical context, or when a just-fixed bump or error should be recorded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。