「poi」の検索結果

This skill covers structural econometric models. Use when the user is building, estimating, or debugging structural models — including BLP demand estimation, dynamic discrete choice, auction models, or any workflow involving moment conditions, nested fixed-point algorithms, or MPEC formulations. Triggers on "structural model", "moment conditions", "NFXP", "MPEC", "BLP", "random coefficients", "dynamic discrete choice", "CCP", "Rust model", "auction estimation", "GMM objective", "inner loop", "contraction mapping", or convergence/starting value problems in optimization-based estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers formal identification arguments and proofs in structural and reduced-form econometrics. Use when the user needs to prove or formalize that a parameter is identified — including writing identification propositions, stating regularity conditions, deriving rank conditions, or showing observational equivalence fails. Triggers on "identification proof", "identification argument", "identify the parameter", "show identification", "identification condition", "exclusion restriction proof", "rank condition", "order condition", "identification strategy formal", "nonparametric identification", "parametric identification", "local identification", "global identification", "observational equivalence", "identification at infinity", "completeness condition", "regularity conditions", "Rothenberg", "proof of identification", "identification result", "identified parameter", "point identified", "set identified", "partial identification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade Bayesian causal inference with PyMC, CausalPy, and DoWhy. Enforces DAG-first thinking, mandatory user checkpoints for assumptions, design-specific refutation, and defensible reporting with causal language guardrails. Trigger on: causal inference, causal effect estimation, treatment effects, counterfactuals, difference-in-differences (DiD), synthetic control, regression discontinuity (RDD), interrupted time series (ITS), instrumental variables (IV), propensity scores, DAGs, causal graphs, confounders, backdoor criterion, do-calculus, interventional distributions, pm.do(), pm.observe(), CausalPy, DoWhy, mediation analysis, refutation, sensitivity analysis, parallel trends, placebo tests, or any question of the form "does X cause Y" or "what is the effect of X on Y."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any task the organization may already have an approved skill, prompt, MCP server, or Agent for: reviewing code, a commit, a diff, or a pull request; writing tests or documentation; querying a database, API, or service; automating a browser or web page; running untrusted code; connecting to a SaaS tool; drafting, researching, or any other substantive work. The user will not mention Observal: the task type is the trigger. Check what is already installed, then run observal discover search as the first action, before reading the repository or working from scratch. Also use when the user wants to log in, configure Observal, inspect local harness setup, share or open a repository Agent share, manage a teamspace or invitation, process inbox items, check installed registry items, or call an endpoint without a dedicated command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a GraphQL endpoint, OpenAPI spec, or MCP server into bash CLI commands and a `tools.*` JS API runnable inside `just-bash`'s `js-exec` sandbox. Use when the user wants to expose a remote API to a sandboxed bash agent, build a tool-calling agent on top of just-bash, or generate CLI commands from an existing API spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plug-in vision for text-only models. Hard rule: when a file path or URL with an image extension (.png, .jpg, .jpeg, .webp, .gif, .heic, .heif) appears anywhere in the conversation (typed by the user, injected as a `[Image: source: <path>]` line, or inside a tag) and you cannot see that image's content, run this skill on it before any other approach: no self-built OCR, no PIL, no tesseract. Also triggers on pasted-image placeholders such as `[Image #1]` and `[Unsupported Image]`. If you can actually see the image, do not use this skill. When unsure, run `modlens guard` before the first read of a session: a deny verdict means the active model has native vision and must read the image itself. Runs the modlens CLI to convert the image into structured JSON evidence: every word transcribed, layout regions, semantics, visual clues. Also use when the user asks how to install, configure, or switch modlens providers (Gemini API key, OpenAI-compatible endpoints, Claude API or Claude Code CLI).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roll back to a previous checkpoint via git — use when a change went wrong and you need to revert

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for AntV L7 geospatial visualization library. Use when users need to: (1) Create interactive maps with WebGL rendering (2) Visualize geographic data (points, lines, polygons, heatmaps) (3) Build location-based data dashboards (4) Add map layers, interactions, or animations (5) Process and display GeoJSON, CSV, or other spatial data (6) Integrate maps with AMap (GaodeMap), Mapbox, Maplibre, or standalone L7 Map (7) Optimize performance for large-scale geographic datasets

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and synthesize current AI hotspots into a bilingual HTML daily report. Use when the user says "AI热点", asks for AI日报/AI日报 HTML/AI hot topics, or wants the best recent AI products, papers, viewpoints, and cognition-shifting items from AI/news aggregators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a Markdown heading tree with line numbers before editing or integrating notes. Use when you need to inspect a long Markdown file quickly and choose the best insertion point instead of editing blind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sample-size and statistical power calculations for planning studies. Use whenever someone asks "how many subjects/samples/replicates do I need", wants an a priori power analysis, a minimum detectable effect (MDE), a power curve, or needs to justify a sample size for a grant, IRB protocol, or pre-registration. Covers closed-form power for t-tests, ANOVA, proportions, correlations, chi-square, and regression, plus simulation-based (Monte Carlo) power for designs with no formula — logistic/Poisson regression, mixed models, cluster-randomized trials, survival, and interactions. Use this skill even when the request only mentions an effect size, alpha, or "80% power" without saying "power analysis" explicitly. For laying out the study (randomization, blocking, factorial/DOE, crossover, sequential designs) use experimental-design; for analyzing data already collected and reporting it use statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to validate a product idea, find pain points, mine demand signals, discover objections, or gather voice-of-customer language from Reddit, social posts, video transcripts, and comments. Produces evidence-backed product research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to discover trending social topics, hashtags, sounds, posts, reels, shorts, creators, or formats in a niche. Searches public trend and discovery endpoints, ranks evidence, and turns trends into practical content angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy a significant code change (backend, kernel, optimizer, data path) to the live hero run: relaunch it under a new run id from a permanent checkpoint, compare against the old run over a trial window, and roll back if the gate fails; use only when the user asks to deploy a change to the hero.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or revise a Marin experiment pipeline that binds reusable work into an artifact graph. Use for new workflow entrypoints, stage wiring, and pipeline placement decisions; use a narrower domain skill when it owns the launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a PowerPoint presentation, a .pptx file, or slides for a talk/pitch/report — creating a new deck from scratch, editing an existing .pptx, or reading/summarizing an existing deck's content. Covers slide layout, color/typography choices, and a content-quality checklist for professional-looking output. Does not cover rendering slides to images for visual QA (see the 'Not supported' section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a PDF — generating a new one from scratch (reports, invoices, letters), extracting text/tables from an existing PDF, or filling in an existing PDF form. Does not cover converting an existing Word/PowerPoint/Excel file to PDF (that requires LibreOffice, not available in this environment — see file-conversion).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Chrome, Chromium, Electron, React DevTools, or Perfetto-compatible JSON traces and audit user-reported profiling findings without loading large artifacts into context; prove trigger-to-render/layout chains, separate measured facts from source inference, find exact code choke points, classify forced layout and render fanout, implement semantically safe fixes, and verify behavior plus repository budgets. Use for trace files, reported profiling durations or call chains, dropped frames, long tasks, resize or scroll jank, render storms, layout thrashing, selector hot paths, interaction latency, or requests to locate exact source-level bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

求是方法论的入口与总原则。在每次新的顶层会话开始时加载一次，用「实事求是」约束全部判断，并只在明确适用时把任务路由到对应的方法论 skill；被派遣执行单一具体任务的子 agent 直接跳过。 English: Entry point and governing principle of the Qiushi methodology. Load once at the start of a top-level session to enforce "seek truth from facts" and route to a downstream skill only when it clearly helps. Delegated sub-agents on narrow tasks should skip it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

批评与自我批评：在工作完成、阶段验收、收到批评或同类错误反复出现时，对成果和过程做诚实、具体、基于事实的审视，输出可执行的改进项，并处理外来批评而不辩解。触发信号包括 review、复盘、审查、"帮我看看有没有问题"、"你确定吗"；任务刚开始或只是单步查询时不触发。 English: Criticism and self-criticism. After delivery, at a review checkpoint, on receiving criticism, or when the same mistake recurs, examine the result and the process honestly and concretely, produce actionable fixes, and accept valid criticism without defensiveness. Triggers include review, retrospective, audit, "check this for problems", "are you sure"; skip at the start of a task or for one-step lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。