「sat」の検索結果

Synthesize repeated themes from selected research conversations or notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find a past decision, document, or conversation in Screenpipe with source links.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Mine GitHub, GitLab and git history for identities, infrastructure and leaked credentials using commit author emails, GitHub code search, the commit… Use when investigating a developer or organisation on GitHub, finding leaked API keys, AWS keys or tokens in code, enumerating org members and their personal repos, or recovering secrets deleted from HEAD but still present in history or forks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- End-to-end passive reconnaissance for a domain, website or IP — builds an asset inventory covering registration, DNS, subdomains, infrastructure, tech stack, history and ownership without sending a single packet to the target. Use when asked to research or profile a domain or website, map what an organisation runs, or investigate a suspicious site without alerting its operator

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move or sync the hub role of an agent-plus-vault setup between computers, where an always-on desktop is the hub and laptops are satellites. Checklist with counters verified before and after, and it never migrates silently. Triggers: "/migrate", "/migrate check", "/migrate pack", "/migrate bootstrap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Enumerate an organisation's subdomains and sibling domains from Certificate Transparency logs and passive DNS, without sending traffic to the target. Use when looking for staging, dev, admin or VPN hosts, mapping the full hostname footprint of a domain, or spotting infrastructure a company forgot it had

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Find leaked or mentioned selectors circulating in pastes, leak forums, Telegram channels and dump markets, and judge whether a claimed leak is genuine or a recycled combolist. Use when checking whether a name, email, domain or credential is circulating, verifying a breach claim made against your organisation, or setting up ongoing leak monitoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull Anton's Grok (grok.com / SuperGrok) conversation history into the Obsidian vault from an official Grok data export (prod-grok-backend.json). Trigger on “/grok-sync“, “синкани grok“, “подтяни grok“, “забери чаты из grok“, “обнови grok“, “sync grok“, “что нового в grok в волт“

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies truthfulness, accuracy, and link integrity of content before publishing. Catches fabricated statistics, dead URLs, misattributed sources, and company claims that contradict the brand DNA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull new and changed claude.ai web conversations into an Obsidian vault, extract artifacts as first-class notes, concept-link them, and refresh the RAG index and dashboard. Idempotent: curated notes are never overwritten. Triggers: "/claudeai-sync", "pull claude.ai", "grab new claude.ai chats".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the current task to a verified result instead of stopping at a plausible report. Use when the user says /continue, keep going, not done yet, push further, or is unhappy with the result. Rebuilds requirements from the conversation, re-checks real state, fixes root causes, verifies from the consumer side, offloads side quests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remote-sensing literature search, citation verification, sensor/platform/dataset query strategy, citation file management (.ris/.bib/.enw conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, DOI/arXiv lookup) across CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and domain web sources. Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows for remote sensing, Earth observation, geospatial AI, GIScience, photogrammetry, SAR, hyperspectral imaging, LiDAR, satellite missions, benchmark datasets, land-cover mapping, change detection, object detection, segmentation, retrieval, or multimodal remote-sensing foundation models. Also trigger on general literature-search needs during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as searching for papers/literature, doing a literature review, verifying a citation, converting citation files, and Chinese phrasings like 文献检索、查文献、找文献、 文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end playbook for creating a new NV oOS Pro toolkit under addons/pro/includes/tools/<toolkit> — folder layout, service layer, tool class conventions (canonical envelope, two-gate sanitisation, capability flags), ALL seven registration surfaces (central registry, admin Tools section, settings status map, both WP-CLI commands, schedule presets, workflow presets, SA Toolkit Manager), fixture/oracle testing with a standalone smoke harness, and the phpcs gotcha checklist. Use when asked to build a new Pro toolkit, add a toolkit to the plugin, scaffold toolkit tools, register toolkit presets/toggles, or debug why a new toolkit's tools or presets don't appear. First case study: food-beverage (F&B Management, 21 tools, 2026-10-08, 20/20 Check-totals oracle verified). Complements mcp-ai-wpoos-toolkit-audit (hardening existing toolkits) and mcp-ai-wpoos-test-suite (repair).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workspace project (IDE + collaborator + starter files). Use when the project is technical and benefits from collaborator support layered between coding tasks. Not for soft-skill conversation or role-play practice; use generate-project with scene_actor roles for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily attendance register: check-in and check-out, hours worked, work mode, late minutes, leave and regularisation flags, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for payroll input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track our share of voice", "what share of the conversation do we own vs competitors", or "trend our SOV this quarter"; computes SOV% = brand mentions ÷ (brand + competitor panel mentions) per platform per period on a LOCKED competitor panel — a panel switch invalidates the trend (restart the series and log the break; the ECHO O3 rule) — plus a sentiment-weighted SOV variant (sentiment labeled Estimated unless human-coded) and a Wikipedia-pageviews attention-share alternative; built from keyless listening connectors, gdelt.py news echo, and user exports — public counts only, closed platforms are never scraped. Not for backlink or offsite SEO signals — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 声量份额/竞品声量对比/提及份额/注意力份额

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "create an influencer brief" or "write a campaign brief"; produces a structured creator brief with deliverables, key messages, creative direction, timeline, disclosure rules, and compensation terms. Not for choosing how to split spend across creators — use budget-optimizer. 达人合作简报/创作者BF

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Reddit Ads measurement, campaign structure, community and interest targeting, creative-native fit, catalog advertising, budgets, brand safety, and reporting. Use for Reddit Ads, promoted posts, conversation ads, community targeting, Reddit Pixel, Reddit Conversions API, or Reddit dynamic product ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that joins two or more collections on a shared key, merging their fields into a single enriched collection. Use for data enrichment, denormalisation, building wide tables for BI, and real-time CDC joins. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (a destination-side SQL join or BI tool view is often simpler). Use when user says "join-collections derivation", "derivation to join two collections", "transformation to enrich with customer data", "derive a wide table", "lookup-join derivation", or "build a join derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads an OpenAPI 3.0 specification and manually implements a type-safe Dart API layer using Dio for HTTP, Freezed or Equatable for models, and json_serializable for serialisation. Use when given an OpenAPI/Swagger file (JSON or YAML) and asked to implement the API in Flutter/Dart, create Dart models from an API schema, build a Dio API client, implement endpoints from a spec, convert openapi to dart, or set up a data/network layer from an API contract. Handles $ref resolution, oneOf union types, enums, query params, request bodies, and DioException error mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generative UI (GenUI) for Flutter using AI models like Google Gemini, Anthropic Claude, or OpenAI via the genui package. Use this skill when building dynamic AI-driven interfaces, conversational UI flows, server-rendered screen layouts, LLM-powered dashboards, chat-based UI generation, or implementing prompt-to-UI systems. Supports AI-generated widgets, reactive data binding, ContentGenerator integration, and A2uiMessageProcessor for real-time UI updates from AI responses. Ideal for apps where UI structure is determined by AI/LLM output rather than hardcoded layouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use OpenAI Codex CLI as a peer collaboration partner — same standing as Claude, not a one-shot tool. Bring Codex in EARLY (ideation, framing decisions, stuck moments), not only for late peer-review. Hand it strategic context (target, research, draft, reasoning), iterate conversationally over ~3-8 turns, converge before surfacing to the human. Invoke when the user says "check / iterate / ideate with Codex" or "ask Codex" — and proactively when stuck between two reasonable framings, pressure-testing a load-bearing claim or structure, or about to ask the human to pick between options two agents could resolve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。