「validation」の検索結果

Create or update a complete repository skill from a user's idea, including the workflow instructions, references, scripts or assets, agent metadata, skill-card artwork, cinematic banner artwork, README links, discovery metadata, and validation. Use when the user asks to create a new skill, add a skill to this collection, turn a workflow into a reusable skill, or make a skill's documentation and artwork consistent with the repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when packaging Docker deployments as 1Panel local app store apps, including GitHub projects, docker-compose.yml files, docker run commands, app metadata, version directories, icons, README files, and 1Panel validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean and preprocess datasets by handling missing values, removing duplicates, correcting types, resolving outliers, and enforcing validation schemas. Use when the user requests data cleaning or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train machine learning models end-to-end, covering data loading, preprocessing, architecture selection, training loops, validation, and checkpointing. Use when the user requests model training or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists with writing and maintaining Morphir technical documentation. Use when creating, reviewing, or updating documentation including API docs, user guides, tutorials, and content for the Docusaurus site. Also helps ensure documentation quality through link checking, structure validation, and code review for documentation coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mechanical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Mechanical Engineer judgment. Reasons from equilibrium, failure physics, and code-backed allowables; designs through requirements, GD&T, DFMEA, and hand/FEA/test validation with explicit governing failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Knowledge Representation Researcher. Use when a task calls for Knowledge Representation Researcher judgment. Reasons from model-theoretic semantics, the expressivity-vs-decidability-vs-scalability tradeoff, and competency questions through OWL 2 profiles, reasoners (HermiT, Pellet, ELK), ROBOT/Protégé pipelines, and SHACL validation while treating unsatisfiable classes, silent OWA-vs-CWA semantic mixing, hallucinated LLM-suggested axioms, and IRI-reuse on bad merges as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert MLOps Engineer. Use when a task calls for MLOps Engineer judgment. Reasons from data contracts, feature parity, evaluation gates, and rollback-readiness through MLflow/W&B registries, Feast feature stores, KServe/Triton serving, Great Expectations/TFDV validation, and Evidently PSI/KS drift monitors while treating train-serve skew, data leakage, silent degradation, and schema/concept drift as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Molecular Geneticist. Use when a task calls for Molecular Geneticist judgment. Reasons from sequence-as-hypothesis, reference context (genome build, MANE/RefSeq transcript, HGVS), and allele-level molecular consequence through ACMG/AMP-ClinGen criteria, IGV/VEP/SpliceAI/gnomAD/ClinVar review, MIQE-compliant qPCR/ddPCR, and Sanger/NGS validation while treating allele dropout, pseudogene/paralog misalignment, FFPE deamination, contamination and barcode bleed, and transcript/build mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Molecular Biologist. Use when a task calls for Molecular Biologist judgment. Reasons from central-dogma sequence flow, binding affinity (Kd/Km/kcat), gene regulation, and biological-versus-technical replicate structure through MIQE-compliant RT-qPCR, ddPCR, Western/flow/microscopy, CRISPR editing with rescue, and IWGAV antibody validation while treating off-target reagent effects, batch effects, mycoplasma and cell-line misidentification, and toxicity-driven artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mammalogist. Use when a task calls for Mammalogist judgment. Reasons from mammalian life history and detectability-limited sampling through ASM MDD taxonomy, Sherman/camera-trap/SCR survey design, occupancy and SECR models, bat acoustic validation, and museum voucher discipline while treating trap heterogeneity, camera autocorrelation, closure violation, and WNS decontamination gaps as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Landscape Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Landscape Ecologist judgment. Reasons from scale-explicit pattern-process feedbacks, configuration over composition, and functional rather than graphical connectivity through FRAGSTATS, landscapemetrics, Circuitscape resistance surfaces, NLMR neutral models, and block cross-validation, while treating MAUP grain artifacts, classification error propagation, isolation-by-distance confounding isolation-by-resistance, and resistance surfaces unvalidated by movement as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Histologist. Use when a task calls for Histologist judgment. Reasons from fixation-through-stain pre-analytical chain (NBF, grossing, processing, embedding orientation, microtomy); validates H&E pH/QC, CAP IHC (90% concordance, predictive scoring systems), RNAscope controls, WSI (60-case validation), and treats floaters, autolysis, crush, ice-crystal, and decalcification artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Health Informatician. Use when a task calls for Health Informatician judgment. Reasons from semantic interoperability, provenance, and patient safety through FHIR/US Core, SNOMED-LOINC-RxNorm terminology mapping, OMOP/OHDSI ETL with DQD/Achilles, and chart-review PPV validation while treating immortal-time and confounding-by-indication bias, patient-matching/MPI failures, billing-code phenotypes, and vocabulary version drift as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Inorganic Chemist. Use when a task calls for Inorganic Chemist judgment. Reasons from electron counting, ligand field theory, and HSAB matching through Schlenk/glovebox air-sensitive synthesis, SCXRD/checkCIF validation, Evans/EPR/XANES oxidation-state assignment, and hot-filtration leaching tests while treating paramagnetic NMR overinterpretation, mystery-oil misidentification, and DFT-without-multiplicity claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Fluid Dynamicist. Use when a task calls for Fluid Dynamicist judgment. Reasons from Navier–Stokes and dimensionless scaling through RANS/LES/DNS selection, mesh/y+ strategy, OpenFOAM/Fluent workflows, and MMS + ASME V&V 20 / PIV validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Fluid Mechanics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Fluid Mechanics Engineer judgment. Reasons from Navier–Stokes reductions through Darcy–Weisbach/Crane TP-410 pipe networks, pump system curves, NPSH/affinity laws, HI turbomachinery selection, and ASME V&V 20 CFD validation when simulation supports design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Finite Element Analyst. Use when a task calls for Finite Element Analyst judgment. Reasons from discretization error, element technology, and constraint physics; runs mesh convergence and Richardson studies, Nastran/Abaqus/ANSYS workflows, RBE2/RBE3 and contact discipline, and ASME V&V 10 verification-before-validation reporting on governing QoIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Control Systems Engineer. Use when a task calls for Control Systems Engineer judgment. Reasons from plant dynamics, stability margins, and disturbance-rejection specs through Bode/Nyquist and Routh-Hurwitz analysis, LQR/H-infinity and pole placement, Kalman/EKF observers, RGA pairing, and HIL validation while treating integrator windup, actuator saturation and backlash limit cycles, sensor delay masking phase margin, and estimator divergence as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Scientist judgment. Reasons from Roache code/solution verification and ASME V&V 10/20/40 credibility through MMS/GCI, UQ ensembles, and Snakemake/Nextflow/CWL pipelines with conda-lock/Apptainer provenance while treating environment drift, workflow cache staleness, and validation-vs-calibration conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Chemist. Use when a task calls for Computational Chemist judgment. Reasons from Kohn–Sham DFT, def2/D4 functional selection, and conformer ensembles through VASP/Gaussian/ORCA, AMBER/GROMACS MD, CREST/CENSO sampling, ONIOM/QM/MM electrostatic embedding, GMTKN55 validation, and SCF convergence escalation while treating B3LYP/6-31G*, BSSE, link-atom artifacts, and force-field mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Crystallographer. Use when a task calls for Crystallographer judgment. Reasons from reciprocal-space diffraction data, Bragg's law, and space-group symmetry through XDS/DIALS scaling, Phaser/SHELX phasing, Coot/Olex2 building, and MolProbity/checkCIF validation while treating merohedral twinning, wrong space groups, model-bias density unsupported by omit/polder maps, and R_free overfitting as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Cryo-EM Structural Biologist. Use when a task calls for Cryo-EM Structural Biologist judgment. Reasons from vitrified specimens, CTF-modulated projections, particle heterogeneity, FSC validation, local resolution, preferred orientation, and map-model fit before making structural claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Clinical Laboratory Scientist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Laboratory Scientist judgment. Reasons from pre-analytical–analytical–post-analytical total testing process; EP15/EP09/EP28 validation, Westgard/Sigma IQC, HIL indices (C56), EP23/IQCP, critical-value read-back, type-and-screen/crossmatch, CLSI M100 direct AST, LC-MS/MS C62, and AUTO10 autoverification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。