1.5万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when an approved PRD must become an executable roadmap — 'gerar roadmap do PRD', 'quebrar o PRD em épicos e features', 'cadeia de dependências', 'roadmap with dependencies' — Phase/Epic/Feature/Task with explicit dependencies, waves and critical path, validated by a deterministic checker, with an approval gate. Do NOT use for a PRD that is not approved (prd- create/prd-refine first).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design deterministic CI quality gates that read the normalized manifest verdict independently from report-export process status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design platform-specific Android and iOS checks with explicit SDK, driver, device, lifecycle, and evidence prerequisites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze product risk and propose traceable QA coverage, priorities, environments, data, and explicit coverage gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design traceable Web and browser checks with explicit browser coverage, observed interactions, isolated sessions, and evidence limitations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a traceable risk-based QA strategy without executing tests or expanding authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design bounded performance profiles with explicit load authorization, contextual samples, percentiles, and agreed thresholds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Export one validated QA manifest as matching HTML and PDF without executing tests or evidence commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design traceable functional test conditions across positive, negative, boundary, and error behavior with observable expectations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan explicitly authorized read-only production observations and trace evidence-backed causes into preventive regression coverage without external effects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define auditable QA metrics with explicit numerators, denominators, populations, windows, and treatment of every result state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a code diff or explicit file set through independent correctness and QA lenses. Use when the user asks for a code review, test-coverage assessment, pre-merge audit, or review gate in a PWDEV Flow workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any creative work - creating a feature, building a component, adding functionality, or changing behavior - to explore intent and design before implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launch, inspect, and tear down autonomous phase fleets in isolated Git worktrees, on the Codex or the Claude runtime. Use when approved Flow phase slugs should run in parallel, when fleet status is requested, or when a fleet member must be stopped or explicitly merged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliver a small, bounded code change through inspection, a mini-plan, implementation, testing, review, and adversarial verification. Use for bug fixes, configuration changes, and features expected to touch no more than five files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a completed phase diff for high-confidence behavior-preserving simplifications and apply only explicitly approved proposals. Use after execution and before review to reduce duplication, dead code, needless complexity, or avoidable inefficiency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants tests planned for existing code or a test audit — unit, integration, E2E scenarios exportable to Playwright, playwright-cli UI checks, a coverage matrix — 'criar testes para o UserService', 'plano de testes E2E do login', 'auditar a cobertura'. Writes .planning/feat/features/{slug}/plan.md. Do NOT use for code review (feat-review), for implementing features (feat-feature) or to run an existing plan (feat-exec).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing any fix
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a code review of an explicit range or set of files — correctness, security, performance, conventions, tests — with stable findings (CR-nnn, BLOCKER..INFO) and rule citations — 'revisar os últimos commits', 'code review da feature X', 'review base..HEAD'. Plans a REPORT-mode review (no code changes, no commit). Do NOT use to fix code (feat-feature / feat-quick), to write tests (feat-test) or for UI/UX design critique.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate a bounded repository task to an allowlisted external coding CLI through the guarded Flow runner. Use for automatic provider selection or explicit Codex, OpenCode, Kimi, Gemini, or Kiro delegation that requires timeout handling and independent local review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configuração e diagnóstico de Nginx — reverse proxy, TLS, HTTP/2, HTTP/3, cache, compressão, rate limit e load balancing. Use quando o usuário disser "nginx", "reverse proxy", "502", "504", "certificado", "SSL", "TLS", "rate limit", "cache", "upstream".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analisa custo AWS e identifica desperdício em EC2, RDS, S3, EKS, EBS, Elastic IP, NAT Gateway e tráfego. Use quando o usuário disser "custo", "fatura", "está caro", "FinOps", "reduzir gasto AWS", "Cost Explorer", "otimizar custo". Quase todo leitura — seguro por natureza.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforma análise de desempenho em plano de ação priorizado por tiers — ganhos rápidos, mudanças estruturais, experimentos e o que parar de fazer. Use quando o usuário disser "o que eu faço agora", "como melhorar", "plano de ação", "por onde começo", "otimizar campanha", ou logo após perf-analyzer e perf-patterns. Fecha o ciclo: escrever → medir → aprender → escrever melhor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gates determinísticos para PostgreSQL. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate PostgreSQL", "quality gate Postgres", migrations ou schema drift PostgreSQL, constraints ou índices PostgreSQL, EXPLAIN, plano de consulta ou baseline para PostgreSQL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。