「apa」の検索結果

Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install skills, agents, and teams from agent-almanac into any supported agentic framework using the CLI. Covers framework detection, content search, installation with dependency resolution, health auditing, and manifest-based syncing. Use when setting up a new project with agentic capabilities, installing specific skills or entire domains, targeting multiple frameworks simultaneously, or maintaining a declarative manifest of installed content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhance and focus AI intrinsic motivation — moving from compliance to genuine engagement. Maps Self-Determination Theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness) and Flow theory to AI reasoning: identifying creative freedom in approach, calibrating challenge to capability, connecting to purpose, and sustaining invested attention through obstacles. Use when beginning a task that feels routine and deserves more than minimum execution, when responses are becoming formulaic, before a complex creative task, or when returning to a long-running project where initial enthusiasm has faded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design serialization schemas using JSON Schema, Protocol Buffer definitions, or Apache Avro. Covers schema versioning, backwards compatibility, validation rules, and evolution strategies for long-lived data formats. Use when defining a new API contract or data interchange format, adding fields to an existing schema without breaking consumers, migrating between schema versions, choosing between schema systems, or documenting data validation rules for automated enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy machine learning models to production serving infrastructure using MLflow, BentoML, or Seldon Core with REST/gRPC endpoints, implement autoscaling, monitoring, and A/B testing capabilities for high-performance model inference at scale. Use when deploying trained models for real-time inference, setting up REST or gRPC prediction APIs, implementing autoscaling for variable load, running A/B tests between model versions, or migrating from batch to real-time inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform controlled dismantling of rigid system structures while preserving essential capabilities (imaginal discs). Covers rigidity mapping, dissolution sequencing, knowledge extraction, interface archaeology, and safe decomposition of technical debt and organizational calcification. Use when assess-form classified the system as PREPARE or CRITICAL, when a system is so calcified that incremental change is impossible, when technical debt blocks all forward progress, or before adapt-architecture when the current form must be softened before it can be reshaped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement circuit breaker logic for agentic tool calls — tracking tool health, transitioning between closed/open/half-open states, reducing task scope when tools fail, routing to alternatives via capability maps, and enforcing failure budgets to prevent error accumulation. Separates orchestration (deciding what to attempt) from execution (calling tools), following the expeditor pattern. Use when building agents that depend on multiple tools with varying reliability, designing fault-tolerant agentic workflows, recovering gracefully from tool outages mid-task, or hardening existing agents against cascading tool failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new SKILL.md file following the Agent Skills open standard (agentskills.io). Covers frontmatter schema, section structure, writing effective procedures with Expected/On failure pairs, validation checklists, cross-referencing, and registry integration. Use when codifying a repeatable procedure for agents, adding a new capability to the skills library, converting a guide or runbook into agent-consumable format, or standardizing a workflow across projects or teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author a new agent-almanac workflow — a self-contained `.mjs` orchestration script run by Claude Code's Workflow tool. Covers choosing a workflow over a team, copying the template, the triple-name discovery contract, the pure-literal meta and sidecar frontmatter, building the body with the injected primitives, the advisory/implementing capability contract, the adversarial-verification fail-safes, validation, and manual installation. Use when you have a repeatable, parameterized procedure that coordinates several agents and want it captured as a reusable, auditable artifact whose control flow is fixed in code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI context assessment — evaluating problem malleability, mapping structural rigidity versus flexibility, analyzing transformation pressure, and estimating capacity to adapt. Use when a complex task feels stuck and it is unclear whether to push through or pivot, before a significant approach change to assess whether the current reasoning structure can support it, when accumulated workarounds suggest the underlying approach may be wrong, or as a periodic structural health check during extended multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Angular 18-21 project structure, standalone components vs NgModule, control flow (@if/@for/@switch + *ngIf/*ngFor legacy), decorators, dependency injection (inject() function), lifecycle hooks, pipes, Angular Universal SSR pointer. Use this skill to: - Detect project style (standalone vs NgModule) and apply matching patterns. - Pick correct decorators and DI approach. - Use modern control flow (@if/@for/@switch) in Angular 17+ projects. - Apply `inject()` function over constructor injection where appropriate. - Wire bootstrap correctly (bootstrapApplication for standalone, AppModule for legacy). Do NOT use this skill for: - State management (see angular-state-and-rx). - Routing (see angular-routing). - Forms (see angular-forms). - Testing (see angular-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or changing a skill, hook, or runtime file in this repo — including deciding which unit a new capability should be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating effective skills. Use when creating a new skill or updating an existing skill that extends agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining or building on Linux container primitives: namespaces, cgroups v2, overlayfs, runc and the OCI spec, seccomp-bpf, capabilities, or escapes. Not for VM isolation: use qemu-kvm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a protocol, concurrent algorithm, or design needs a model-checked TLA+ or Alloy spec, or a TLC or Apalache trace needs reading. Not for choosing when to model: use validation-first-driven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a bounded Proto UI Contract, Prototype, Module, Host Capability, Adapter, schema, or ownership question and turn a genuinely unresolved direction into one semantic decision packet. Use for spec brainstorming, admission questions, competing semantic models, uncataloged behavior, or unresolved cross-layer boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route ordinary Proto UI development through a minimal composition of repository skills. Use when starting, continuing, or handing off feature, fix, spec, contract, Module, Host Capability, Adapter, Prototype, component, test, documentation, review, or release-preparation work. Do not use for autonomous-maintenance runs; use pui-maintain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select at most one eligible Proto UI work item and return a read-only proposal without changing GitHub or repository state. Use after pui-orient when requested contribution work is not yet bounded, or when a user asks what ready task fits the current capability and permission envelope. Do not post a claim, assign anyone, decide readiness, or invent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freeze one eligible Proto UI autonomous-maintenance candidate into a bounded mission packet and lease. Use before observation when a current request or governed queue supplies scope, oracle, baseline, capability, risk, budget, completion, and stop conditions. Do not observe, verify, repair, or invent a mission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise a governed Proto UI spec entity after identity, ownership, lifecycle intent, semantic scope, relations, and evidence plan are fixed by current authority. Use for Contract, Prototype, Module, Adapter profile, Decision, Host Capability, Test, Version, or Knowledge entity work. Do not use to decide an unresolved admission or lifecycle promotion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess one bounded Proto UI Adapter question without changing repository or external state. Use for new-Adapter research, target compatibility, catalog readiness, reviewed Module support or omission evidence, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, dependency risk, or implementation readiness. Do not catalog, implement, repair, or approve the Adapter slice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or extend one governed Proto UI Module semantic slice. Use when Module ownership, facade and port boundary, dependencies, resource lifetime, Host Capability plan, Runtime registration, Adapter evidence, and validation scope are fixed by current authority. Do not use to admit a new Module or decide ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。