7,942 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
2-layer plan validation: instant structural checks + trigger-based specialist agents. Auto-fixes issues using ADRs and first principles. Every issue must be resolved before execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a validated plan: worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, level-based parallel agents, quality gate with smoke test, PR creation and merge. Handles everything through to merged PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keyword research from a seed topic — ideas, real Google volume/CPC, intent, difficulty, clustered into a plan. Use when asked to "find keywords", "keyword research for X", "what should I rank for", or "build a keyword plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you act as Leader and maintain durable TeamHarness project state for Quick Task or Project Work: create_quick_project, create_project, plan_dag, plan_loop, ready_nodes, resolve_project, accept_task_result, project completion, and requester report state. Do not use to create Matrix task rooms or send messages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before any projectflow call or Team Leader workflow involving Project state, Project lifecycle, DAG planning, Loop planning, ready node checks, pause/resume/complete, project recovery, heartbeat project checks, or project-level result aggregation. Always use team-coordination first when the question is how to organize the work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft flexible daily or weekly schedules around a user's priorities, availability, energy patterns, and fixed commitments. Use for day planning, deadline reverse-planning, focus protection, or a time audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend practical study strategies matched to the material, learning goal, assessment, time, and learner constraints. Use for revision planning, homework routines, independent study, replacing ineffective habits, or adapting recall, spacing, explanation, and practice activities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 5-stage recon pipeline (seed discovery, asset expansion, enrichment, exposure analysis, reporting), asset-graph discipline with 29 asset types, severity rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, asset-level triage rules, scale-based tactics, identity-fabric mapping (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 Teams+SharePoint+OAuth), API and auth-map methodology, JavaScript deep analysis, mobile attack surface, cloud attack surface, breach×identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing (back-off, persona rotation), read-only validator discipline, WAF/CDN bypass + origin discovery, vulnerability prioritization (CVE/EPSS/KEV), phishing infrastructure planning + pretext development, bug bounty submission templates, client deliverable templates with risk translation, threat-actor investigation (incl. RU/CN pivots), cryptocurrency tracing, image/video forensics, chronolocation. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, tracing crypto flows, geolocating media, or performing attribution work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stand up and run a LinkedIn employee advocacy program for a marketing or sales team. Covers 14-day launch playbook, brand-guideline governance, per-post time budget, cadence benchmarks, and team ROI (reach, engagement, pipeline). Triggers on "employee advocacy", "get the team posting", "scale LinkedIn across team", "advocacy ROI". Not for planning one person's own calendar (use linkedin-content-planner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, draft, audit, and publish LinkedIn posts and comments. Use when the user wants to write a viral LinkedIn post, draft a comment or reply on any LinkedIn post URL, audit a draft against 2026 algorithm heuristics, remove AI tells, extract hook formulas from viral posts, or plan a week of content. Powered by the Publora API for publishing. User provides post/comment URLs, skill drafts content, user approves, then publishes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate natural language to SQL, optimize query performance, and interpret EXPLAIN plans for SQLite and PostgreSQL. Triggered when users ask to convert questions into SQL, improve slow queries, tune indexes, analyze execution plans, or mention keywords like NL2SQL, query tuning, or full table scan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user is discussing daily research work, TODOs, plans, standups, meetings, milestones, or general project progress that should be reflected in Obsidian daily notes, plan notes, and hub updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform research descriptions into well-structured implementation plans following project conventions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope a feature end to end and write an implementation spec under specs/ from an accepted proposal — current-system mapping, goals/non-goals, a Decision Log for one-way-door choices, a live Open Questions backlog, and a real migration + test plan. Read when asked to write a spec, scope this feature, turn this proposal into a spec, plan the implementation, or break this into tasks. Do NOT fire on frame a proposal or write the PRD (sibling frame-a-proposal — a PRD frames a change before it is accepted; this skill starts once one is), record a decision or write the ADR (record-a-decision), write a postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or review this design (review-a-design) — those are separate skills. Complements the platform open-knowledge skill; does not replace it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and review ChatGPT Ads experiments without assuming ad inventory, account access, or platform capabilities. Use for ChatGPT advertising, OpenAI ads, conversational ad concepts, ChatGPT campaign plans, or performance reviews from a verified export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。