2,483 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Unified GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. Classifies open items, answers questions from codebase, analyzes bugs, reviews PRs, and produces a structured triage report. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and analyzes ambiguous language in software requirements and user stories. Use when reviewing requirements documents, user stories, specifications, or any software requirement text to identify vague quantifiers, unclear scope, undefined terms, missing edge cases, subjective language, and incomplete specifications. Provides detailed analysis with clarifying questions and suggested improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query decomposition and multi-source search orchestration. Breaks natural language questions into targeted searches per source, translates queries into source-specific syntax, ranks results by relevance, and handles ambiguity and fallback strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a specific person using Common Room data. Triggers on 'who is [name]', 'look up [email]', 'research [contact]', 'is [name] a warm lead', or any contact-level question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a company using Common Room data. Triggers on 'research [company]', 'tell me about [domain]', 'pull up signals for [account]', 'what's going on with [company]', or any account-level question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ACTIVATE when preparing for board meetings, creating board decks, drafting board materials, developing executive summaries for directors, writing talking points, crafting board agendas, addressing governance matters, preparing for investor questions, or managing board communication. Critical for any board-facing materials, shareholder communication, or governance compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find documentation and repository evidence for library behavior, API contracts, error messages, and known bugs. Use when a programming question needs current public documentation, issues, pull requests, or implementation examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has a research question and needs a complete experiment package — design document, runnable code, results (measured or simulated with honest provenance), publication-grade figures, structured report. Single-stage, no Python runtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find authoritative guidance for installing, configuring, operating, securing, and troubleshooting OpenClaw, including channels, model providers, Gateway operations, tools, plugins, automation, nodes, multi-agent routing, and CLI errors. Use for any question or maintenance task involving an OpenClaw installation, `openclaw` CLI command, Gateway daemon, configuration key, or integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Five-phase pipeline (triage → clarify → research → PRD → plan) that turns a raw idea into four linked files: clarifying questions, deep research, a PRD with non-goals and metrics, and a phased execution plan with mermaid user journey and kill criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-time autonomous design context discovery. Scans the codebase to extract design tokens, typography, colors, spacing, brand patterns, and tech stack, then writes a Design Context section to CLAUDE.md. Zero questions asked. Use when: 'setup design', 'design context', 'design tokens', 'brand discovery', 'design system scan', 'initialize design', 'teach design'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and query AI-powered knowledge bases from claude-mem observations. Use when users want to create focused "brains" from their observation history, ask questions about past work patterns, or compile expertise on specific topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever you need to understand how this theme works — adding pages, managing content, configuring the site, using partials/components/modules, project architecture, scripts, or styling/theming (Tailwind v4, Bootstrap 5, or a hybrid — verify which). Use for ANY question about the structure, usage, or customization of the template or theme.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing for, running, or closing a live meeting with an AI assistant dashboard. Triggers on "meeting copilot", "live copilot", "prepare for a call", "update copilot", "close the session", or requests to turn transcript chunks into meeting questions, topic maps, decisions, and follow-ups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a user from an unclear idea to an actionable plan through the agent harness's native ask tool and clickable choices. Use when the user wants a guided requirements interview, step-by-step questions, help deciding what to build, or a button-led path from goals to scope, solution, and technology choices. Do not turn an ordinary implementation request or a single clarification into an interview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the big picture around a topic or software repository by identifying its boundaries, layers, actors, components, relationships, flows, history, fault lines, and open questions, then explain how the pieces fit together and where to look next. Use when a user asks to understand a whole field, domain, technology, ecosystem, industry, codebase, architecture, unfamiliar repo, or phrases such as "give me the big picture", "map the landscape", "how does this all fit together?", "help me get oriented", or "what am I missing?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight standalone design spec for AI coding agents: codebase scan → bounded clarify pass (3–5 questions, not a grill) → reviewed design doc written to docs/plans/ → independent scored review → stop. No task board, no build. Use when you want a spec to discuss, hand off, or review before committing to implementation. Chains into absolute-work when ready to build. Triggers on "absolute spec", "write a spec", "spec out this feature", "draft a design doc", "I want a spec to hand off / review, don't build it yet".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task may benefit from a bounded subagent for implementation, large-codebase discovery at task start, independent review, requested or pre-commit code simplification, or expert work on complex decisions, modeling, automation, or repeated failures. The main agent chooses whether to delegate and accepts the result. Do not use for simple questions or short work with no meaningful review or delegation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine a Stage 4 follow-up response using condensed prior discussion context, current follow-up question, and the user's draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, profile, clean, reconcile, analyze, visualize, and verify spreadsheet data while preserving formulas, formatting, types, and source files. Use when working with .xlsx, .xlsm, .xls, .ods, .csv, or .tsv files; answering questions from a workbook; auditing formulas or data quality; comparing sheets or versions; producing pivots, charts, forecasts, or summary workbooks; repairing malformed tables; or validating that spreadsheet edits and calculations are accurate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress selected context to a target token budget while preserving decisions, evidence, constraints, and unresolved questions. Use when relevant material is already selected but too long; use context-optimization when selection, deduplication, and ordering are also required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。