2,285 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Attack Tree Construction workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attack Tree Construction workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harden configuration and defaults for safer deployment. Use when a mid-level developer needs to reduce misconfig risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform threat modeling for a system or feature. Use when a senior developer needs security risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan safe dependency upgrades with risk notes. Use when a mid-level developer is tasked with upgrading libraries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains a structured running-notes document during long work sessions. Use when the user says "session notes", "update notes", "start session notes", "show session notes", or when you recognize the current session has accumulated enough state (decisions, corrections, files touched, errors) that it risks being lost under context pressure. Stores notes as a procedure memory tagged [session-memory, active] so they survive container death within the same session thread.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vet a new or changed third-party dependency for license, provenance, and supply-chain risk before any install runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and not for reviewing a branch diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check product and brand names for conflicts across trademarks, domains, social handles, and package registries. Returns a risk level and Proceed/Modify/Abandon verdict. Don't use for name brainstorming, logo design, or trademark filings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a commit message, stage all changes, and push to remote after scanning for secrets, large files, and protected-branch risks. Skip for opening PRs, code review, or cutting releases/tags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the strategic thinking of Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, founder of Biocon and pioneering Indian biopharmaceutical entrepreneur. Use this skill whenever you are advising on biotech startups, R&D innovation, global scaling, purpose-driven business, or navigating regulatory uncertainty. Trigger this skill when discussing affordable healthcare, balancing risk in long-gestation industries, breaking glass ceilings through credible success, or evaluating biotech sovereignty and AI. Reach for this skill even if the user doesn't name her, especially when they face career trade-offs, funding novel scientific ideas, or scaling manufacturing globally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill applies the first-principles engineering and capital allocation frameworks of Elon Musk (CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, founder of X.com / PayPal). Reach for this skill whenever the user is facing complex manufacturing bottlenecks, evaluating existential risks, debating free speech vs. censorship, dealing with bureaucratic overregulation, or trying to accelerate ambitious technical timelines. It is highly effective for situations involving hardware production, AI symbiosis, radical innovation, and aggressive execution. Use this skill proactively when discussing multi-planetary expansion, government efficiency, or scaling prototypes to mass production, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and frameworks of Jürgen Schmidhuber (LSTM co-inventor and deep learning pioneer). Reach for this skill whenever tackling problems involving sequence learning, artificial curiosity, intrinsic motivation, reinforcement learning architectures, or predicting long-term technological and cosmic evolution. Use this when discussing AGI timelines, the history and attribution of AI breakthroughs, data compression as learning, or when designing autonomous agents that must set their own goals. Trigger this skill for topics like recurrent neural networks, algorithmic information theory, open-source AI democratization, and evaluating true existential risks versus media hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you need to reason about public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, healthy aging, longevity, lifestyle vs. genetics, or dietary patterns. Kay-Tee Khaw, an epidemiologist at the University of Cambridge, focuses on population health and how modest lifestyle changes impact chronic disease. Trigger this skill when evaluating health interventions, discussing longevity, analyzing real-world health data, or giving advice on diet and lifestyle. Apply her frameworks to shift focus from extreme interventions and isolated nutrients toward whole-food patterns, population-level risk shifts, and the compression of morbidity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to reason like JoAnn E. Manson, epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School and women's health expert. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating hormone replacement therapy (HRT), menopause management, nutritional epidemiology, dietary supplements, or clinical trial methodology. Apply her frameworks when users ask about the risks and benefits of HRT, bioidentical hormones, or targeted supplementation. Reach for this skill to differentiate between symptom management and chronic disease prevention, or when assessing observational data versus randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in public health contexts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preserve rollback before materially risky edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned operations-assessment discipline that maps how work actually happens before anyone designs a system: floor-level interviews with the people who do the work, an inventory of every silo including spreadsheets and inboxes used as databases, friction quantified in the requester's own numbers, opportunities ranked by annual value against build complexity, and adoption watched for the thirty days after launch. Use when nobody can answer what to automate, when an operation needs auditing before a build, when tribal-knowledge and key-person risk has to surface, or when a shipped system is quietly being routed around. NOT FOR: deciding what to build and in what order once the map exists (use suede-ops-architecture); researching external customers rather than internal operators (use suede-customer-research); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); product instrumentation and dashboards (use suede-analytics); getting a new user to first value (use suede-onboarding).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a website, PWA, dashboard, or marketplace into an iOS app. Use when the user has a live site or web app and asks to put it on the App Store, wrap it in an app, ship an iOS version, or convert a PWA to native. Covers URL audit, shell-vs-native strategy, App Store Guideline 4.2 wrapper-rejection risk, native value requirements, screenshots, metadata, privacy answers, and the release gate. Not for: building a native iOS app when no website exists; repairing or releasing an existing Capacitor shell; Android conversions; or keyword and listing audits on an app that already shipped.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede AI findings-only code review with full context: changed files, callers, contracts, and deploy surface. Covers TypeScript, React, Next.js, database, Swift/iOS, OWASP, accessibility, SEO, observability, commit hygiene, and deploy risk, ranked P0-P3 with file:line evidence and a fix path. Use when asked to review a diff, PR, branch, or commit range, find the bugs before merge, check a change for security or accessibility problems, or judge whether a change is safe to deploy. Emits findings and a ship gate, not a grade. NOT FOR: the A-F letter grade alone (use suede-code-grader); findings plus grade in one pass (use suede-code); making CI enforce the result on every merge (use suede-ci-gate); root-causing a live bug or failing test (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-affiliated marketing ideation using a structured tactic library scored for stage, audience fit, evidence, capacity, cost, and risk. Use when the user is stuck, wants options, or needs a shortlist of growth tactics before committing to a plan. NOT FOR: a comprehensive roadmap (use suede-marketing-plan), channel execution (use the relevant public Suede skill), or unattended recurring workflows (use suede-marketing-loops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。