「rsa」の検索結果

Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of the evidence verification pipeline. Validates GitHub star counts in registry skill files against live GitHub API data and flags stale or inflated metrics without repartitioning evidence by rank. Use this after /ev-collection has compiled the unified data lake and before /ev-adversarial-audit begins. Trigger phrases: "verify stars", "check star counts", "refresh stargazer metrics", "run star verification", "ev-star-verification", "Phase 2", "live star check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2B of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Verifies benchmark-result rows and benchmark-source candidates against registry/benchmark-sources.json before adversarial audit, link validation, catalog promotion, or ingestion. Use when running /ev-pipeline, checking benchmark-result evidence, reviewing benchmark-source candidates, or preparing benchmark rows for /gaia-ingest-batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Novoads API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enriches indicators with context from threat-intel sources: planning lookups against reputation, passive DNS, WHOIS, and sandbox/sample databases, scoring confidence, and avoiding operational-security mistakes that tip off adversaries. Activates for requests to enrich IOCs, add threat context, or plan indicator lookups safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyzes macOS Mach-O malware: parsing the header and load commands, handling fat/universal binaries, reading linked dylibs and entitlements, and checking code signatures to infer capability and trust. Activates for requests to analyze a Mach-O binary, inspect macOS malware, or parse load commands and entitlements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frames a structured, testable threat-hunting hypothesis: grounding it in adversary behavior and available telemetry, defining the data sources and detection logic, and setting success criteria and outcomes. Activates for requests to start a threat hunt, write a hunt hypothesis, or plan a hypothesis-driven hunt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain Pulp's macOS Intel (x86_64) portability lint and CI tiering — the PULP_INTEL_CANARY configure gate, intel_canary_lint.py + its allowlist, and the Tier 0-3 workflows (build.yml canary step, intel-portability.yml, nightly-intel.yml, release-cli.yml universal gate). Use when touching cross-arch build wiring, arch-gated SIMD, or Intel CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Lanhu HTML/CSS output into project frontend code for Vue, React, or the detected stack, with component reuse and design token mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lanhu to Code workflow for Claude Code. Convert Lanhu design URLs into Vue/React frontend code with component reuse, design token mapping, TODO-safe business logic, and optional code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract Lanhu design HTML, CSS, and assets through Lanhu MCP for Claude Code design-to-code workflows. Called by design-to-code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan frontend src directories and generate docs/components.md so Claude Code can reuse existing Vue/React components during design-to-code generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured discovery session to build an Allium specification through conversation. Use when the user wants to create a new spec from scratch, elicit or gather requirements, capture domain behaviour, specify a feature or system, define what a system should do, or is describing functionality and needs help shaping it into a specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an electric-motor and power-tool repairer — reading a megohmmeter/polarization-index test to catch a winding fault before failure, deciding rewind vs. replace on a failed induction motor, isolating a bearing fault from a broken-rotor-bar fault, judging brush/commutator wear on a universal motor, or evaluating whether a rewind was actually done to spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a choreographer — building and teaching a dance number against a rehearsal-hour budget, staging repertory under a trust/estate's licensing rules, planning a tech-week spacing and cueing schedule, or diagnosing why a piece isn't reading from the audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Media Technical Director/Manager — calling a live broadcast switcher and owning the technical readiness sign-off, designing router/path redundancy and PTP failover for an IP production, resolving a timecode or loudness compliance defect found in rehearsal, or running the post-incident review after an on-air technical failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Teacher, Postsecondary — grading case analysis on the rigor of business reasoning rather than matching a single "correct" answer, updating stale textbook examples against current market conditions rather than teaching them as still-current, distinguishing taught analytical frameworks from personal business opinion presented as universal fact, and preserving the incomplete-information trade-offs of real business decisions rather than simplifying problems into false certainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional Actor — breaking down sides for a self-tape audition, preparing a character choice for rehearsal, deciding between two conflicting bookings, reading a contract offer for scale vs. scale-plus terms, or diagnosing why callbacks aren't converting to bookings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how arkhe skills bootstrap on Claude Code, Antigravity CLI (agy) / Gemini CLI, and Codex CLI, and maps Claude-only tools (AskUserQuestion, TaskCreate, EnterPlanMode, the Skill tool, the Agent tool) to their cross-platform equivalents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert simplified Chinese to Traditional Chinese (zh-TW), covering characters, Taiwan vocabulary, and phrasing. Use when the user asks to convert 簡體 to 正體/繁體, localise mainland Chinese text for Taiwan, fix simplified characters left in a document or repository, check whether content is written in proper zh-TW, or normalise variant forms such as 着/裏/爲 to the Taiwan standard. Handles both files edited in place and text pasted into the conversation. Runs on Python 3 standard library alone, with no OpenCC and no installed packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。