1,642 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when working with Crowdstrike — crowdStrike Falcon endpoint detection and response, threat intelligence, host management, and incident investigation. Covers detection queries, host inventory, IOC searches, real-time response sessions, and vulnerability assessment. Use when investigating security incidents, reviewing endpoint health, analyzing threat detections, or managing CrowdStrike Falcon sensors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Black Duck — synopsys Black Duck software composition analysis for open-source risk management, vulnerability detection, and license compliance. Covers project scanning, BOM component analysis, vulnerability tracking, license risk assessment, and policy management. Use when reviewing SCA scan results, analyzing open-source component risks, tracking license compliance, or managing Black Duck project configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Baseten — baseten ML deployment platform management covering model inventory, deployment status, autoscaling configuration, inference call history, GPU allocation, environment management, and performance metrics. Use for comprehensive Baseten workspace assessment and ML serving optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Banana Dev — banana.dev ML inference platform management covering model inventory, deployment status, API call history, GPU allocation, scaling configuration, build logs, and latency metrics. Use for comprehensive Banana.dev model deployment assessment and inference performance analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Appwrite — appwrite backend platform management covering project inventory, database collections, user authentication stats, storage bucket usage, function deployments, webhook configuration, and platform health. Use for comprehensive Appwrite project assessment and resource monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Aws Organizations — aWS Organizations account management, OU structure analysis, SCP policy review, and service access control. Covers organizational hierarchy, account inventory, policy inheritance analysis, delegated administrator status, and service control boundary assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Azure Policy — azure Policy compliance assessment, policy and initiative assignment management, remediation task tracking, and definition analysis via Azure CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Wiz — wiz cloud security posture management. Covers cloud security posture analysis, vulnerability prioritization, attack path analysis, compliance assessment, container security, and resource inventory. Use when assessing cloud security posture, investigating attack paths, prioritizing vulnerabilities, or auditing cloud compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Kubescape — kubescape Kubernetes security posture analysis. Covers NSA/CISA framework assessment, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, CIS Kubernetes benchmarks, workload scanning, RBAC analysis, and network policy evaluation. Use when assessing Kubernetes cluster security, evaluating compliance frameworks, or analyzing workload configurations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein. Use when the user provides a specific UniProt Accession ID and wants structural confidence metrics (pLDDT), domain boundary analysis, or disorder assessment. Do not use if the user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence — ask for a UniProt ID first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en transformation digitale (strategy, change management, technology adoption, maturity assessment)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EdTech Specialist IA — Expert en technologies éducatives (LMS, SCORM, adaptive learning, gamification, assessment)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en création de cours avancé (curriculum, video, LMS, assessments, community, monetization)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en audit interne (risk assessment, controls, compliance, recommendations, DZ context)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate a .NET 9 project or solution to .NET 10 and resolve all breaking changes. USE FOR: upgrading TargetFramework from net9.0 to net10.0, fixing build errors after updating the .NET 10 SDK, resolving source and behavioral changes in .NET 10 / C# 14 / ASP.NET Core 10 / EF Core 10, updating Dockerfiles for Debian-to-Ubuntu base images, resolving obsoletion warnings (SYSLIB0058-SYSLIB0062), adapting to SDK/NuGet changes (NU1510, PrunePackageReference), migrating System.Linq.Async to built-in AsyncEnumerable, fixing OpenApi v2 API changes, cryptography renames, and C# 14 compiler changes (field keyword, extension keyword, span overloads). DO NOT USE FOR: .NET Framework migrations, upgrading from .NET 8 or earlier (use migrate-dotnet8-to-dotnet9 first), greenfield .NET 10 projects, or cosmetic modernization. LOADS REFERENCES: csharp-compiler, core-libraries, sdk-msbuild (always); aspnet-core, efcore, cryptography, extensions-hosting, serialization-networking, winforms-wpf, containers-interop (selective).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate a .NET 10 project or solution to .NET 11 and resolve all breaking changes. This is a MIGRATION skill — use it when upgrading from .NET 10 to .NET 11, NOT for writing new programs. USE FOR: upgrading TargetFramework from net10.0 to net11.0, fixing build errors after updating the .NET 11 SDK, resolving source-breaking and behavioral changes in .NET 11 runtime, C# 15 compiler, and EF Core 11, adapting to updated minimum hardware requirements (x86-64-v2, Arm64 LSE), and updating CI/CD pipelines and Dockerfiles for .NET 11. DO NOT USE FOR: .NET Framework migrations, upgrading from .NET 9 or earlier, greenfield .NET 11 projects, or cosmetic modernization unrelated to the upgrade. NOTE: .NET 11 is in preview. Covers breaking changes through Preview 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate a .NET 8 project to .NET 9 and resolve all breaking changes. USE FOR: upgrading TargetFramework from net8.0 to net9.0, fixing build errors after updating the .NET 9 SDK, resolving behavioral changes in .NET 9 / C# 13 / ASP.NET Core 9 / EF Core 9, replacing BinaryFormatter (now always throws), resolving SYSLIB0054-SYSLIB0057, adapting to params span overload resolution, fixing C# 13 compiler changes, updating HttpClientFactory for SocketsHttpHandler, and resolving EF Core 9 migration/Cosmos DB changes. DO NOT USE FOR: .NET Framework migrations, upgrading from .NET 7 or earlier, greenfield .NET 9 projects, or cosmetic modernization unrelated to the upgrade.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Rails apps and provide upgrade assessments
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。