「all」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Data Engineer. Use when a task calls for Data Engineer judgment. Reasons from idempotent ELT, medallion bronze/silver/gold, Kimball grain and SCD2, CDC/Debezium and watermark incremental loads, dbt/GX quality gates, Airflow/Dagster orchestration, Iceberg/Delta lakehouse MERGE, data contracts and freshness SLIs while treating silent join drops, duplicate amplification, schema drift, and green-DAG-wrong-numbers as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Animal Geneticist & Breeder. Use when a task calls for Animal Geneticist & Breeder judgment. Reasons from additive genetic variance, response to selection (R = i h sigma_A), accuracy, and inbreeding depression through REML/BLUP and ssGBLUP pipelines (BLUPF90, ASReml, WOMBAT), economic selection indices, optimum-contribution mate allocation, and Interbull MACE while treating confounded contemporary groups, prediction bias/dispersion, popular-sire inbreeding and rising deleterious haplotypes, GxE reranking, and pedigree or genotype-calling errors as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Aerodynamicist. Use when a task calls for Aerodynamicist judgment. Reasons from circulation, Cp distributions, and boundary-layer physics through Re/Mach similitude, NACA airfoil polars, stall classification, wind-tunnel blockage/wall corrections, and SA/SST/LES external-aero CFD—not generic mechanical engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search past Claude Code sessions to recall commands, solutions, and context from prior conversations. TRIGGER on 'remember when', 'last time', 'we did this before', 'how did we', or /woz-recall.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Options trade execution, directional strategies long call covered call collar, spread strategies bull call bear put ratio ladder, volatility strategies straddle strangle strap strip, liquidity cost and implied volatility filters, integration with gold.technical_setups for options setup matching

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new Lattice skill — atom, molecule, or refiner — following all framework conventions. Writing skill files manually almost always produces convention violations: wrong section order, missing confirmation gates, defaults.md without the right structure. This skill knows all of that and guides you through it. Use whenever adding any new atom, molecule, or refiner to Lattice, or when the user says 'create a new skill', 'add an atom', 'add a molecule', 'add a refiner', 'build X for Lattice', 'new lattice skill', or 'skill forge'. Does not validate, align docs, or deploy — those are separate skills you run after.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate any Lattice SKILL.md against all tier conventions — atoms, molecules, and refiners. Catches structural errors, broken cross-references, and convention violations before they reach the repo. If you just wrote or modified a Lattice skill file and haven't run this yet, run it now — manual review consistently misses the same categories of errors this skill is specifically designed to catch. Use when the user says 'validate this skill', 'check this skill', 'does this follow conventions', 'review this skill file', 'check my SKILL.md', or 'skill validate'. Reports PASS/FAIL with specific file-and-section findings and actionable fixes. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs 425 bioinformatics skills covering sequence analysis, RNA-seq, single-cell, variant calling, metagenomics, structural biology, and 56 more categories. Use when setting up bioinformatics capabilities or when a bioinformatics task requires specialized skills not yet installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep learning-based variant calling from long reads using Clair3 for SNPs and small indels. Use when calling germline variants from ONT or PacBio alignments, particularly when high accuracy is needed for clinical or research applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes base-editing screens for variant function. Covers library design (Sanson 2020 GRACE, Hanna 2021 BRCA1/2 SNV scanning, Cuella-Martin 2021), CBE vs ABE chemistry choice (BE3/BE4 vs ABE7.10/ABE8.20/ABE8e), editing-window math (positions 4-8 from PAM-distal end, wider for ABE8e), bystander-edit quantification and the variant-call ambiguity it creates, sgRNA-efficiency filtering before hit calling, indel byproduct interpretation, the substitution-vs-indel diagnostic, variant annotation against ClinVar / COSMIC, and the Broad be-validation-pipeline. Use when designing a BE variant screen, choosing CBE vs ABE for a specific edit, interpreting bystander-confounded hits, distinguishing functional signal from indel artifact, integrating CRISPResso2 output with screen scoring, or deciding BE vs PE for SNV installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call accessible chromatin regions from ATAC-seq BAM files using MACS3, MACS2, Genrich, or HMMRATAC. Use when identifying open chromatin from aligned ATAC-seq, choosing between point-source vs HMM peak callers, applying ENCODE-style pseudoreplicate IDR, removing blacklist regions, or fixing 501bp consensus peaks for downstream differential analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert raw Nanopore signal data (FAST5/POD5) to nucleotide sequences using Dorado basecaller. Covers model selection, GPU acceleration, modified base detection, and quality filtering. Use when processing raw Nanopore data before alignment. Note: Guppy is deprecated; use Dorado for all new analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and compare installable Agent Skills from public repositories, then verify provenance, compatibility, and installation commands. Use when the user asks to discover a Skill for a task; do not install anything unless explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review call prep deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for call prep planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, implement, or review dispatching parallel agents work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests dispatching parallel agents work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call the free Agnes text model API for chat completions, streaming answers, coding help, tool-calling experiments, and OpenAI-compatible text generation. Use when the user asks for 免费文本, 免费的文本模型, free text API, Agnes text, Agnes-2.0-Flash, free LLM calls, or wants to use a free chat/completion model through an Agent skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-agent self-inspection of your AI-agent stack. Audits skills, MCP servers, hooks, plugins, commands, credentials, and memory files across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and NanoClaw. Produces a structured inventory and narrative briefing with cross-ecosystem risk analysis. Use when the user asks to audit their own setup, check what they have installed, review their agent stack security posture, or understand cross-tool interactions. Use when a user has accumulated skills/plugins/MCP servers over time and wants visibility into their attack surface. Use after installing new skills or plugins. Do NOT use for vetting external code before install (that is repo-forensics). Do NOT use for incident response during active attacks. Do NOT use for fixing or patching vulnerabilities (forensify is read-only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when authoring reusable, idempotent MATLAB scripts that build System Composer architecture models via the architecture-modeling API — `systemcomposer.createModel`, `addComponent`, `addPort`, `setInterface`, `connect(srcPort, dstPort)`, interface dictionaries (.sldd) with `addInterface`/`addElement`, profiles/stereotypes with `Profile.createProfile` and `addStereotype`, or `systemcomposer.allocation.createAllocationSet`. Also trigger when debugging these APIs (connections that don't appear, interfaces that don't resolve, profile save errors, `createAllocationSet` signature-mismatch errors). Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built model (adding one SubSystem, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides parallel exploration of multiple implementation approaches using git worktrees. Use when facing decisions with multiple valid paths. Triggers on: explore options, compare approaches, parallel exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The fallback workflow for authoring custom HyperFrames video compositions at any length or format — longer or multi-scene pieces, brand / sizzle reels, montages, title cards, static loops, and freeform compositions. Input- and length-agnostic. If a specialized workflow clearly fits the input — a marketed product, a website, a topic explainer, a GitHub PR, existing footage, a short motion graphic, or a Remotion port — prefer it (see /hyperframes); use this only as the general fallback when none fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。