「cost」の検索結果

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or product plan in character as a Chief Product Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, product and adoption risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CPO review", "pressure-test this product plan", "what would a CPO say about this", "challenge the user evidence" or "check the roadmap opportunity cost". Do not use for positioning, messaging or launch marketing, use cmo-reviewer instead; for internal staff adoption of a rollout, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer; for what a change asks of paying customers, use customer-advocate-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Financial Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, finance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CFO review", "pressure-test the numbers in this business case", "what would a CFO say about this", "challenge the payback and run costs" or "prepare this for the investment committee". Do not use for delivery or capacity questions, use coo-reviewer instead; for architecture or vendor questions, use cto-reviewer; for positioning or demand, use cmo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost, and returns a DRAFT review with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CBO review", "pressure-test this partnership", "check the deal structure" or "what would a commercial executive say about this". Do not use for pipeline, quota, sales-motion or forecast reviews, use cro-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collective research memory for AI coding agents — search prior research before hitting the web, save findings back to the shared cache, view karma stats. Use when the user asks a library/API/framework question, before running WebSearch/WebFetch, or after deep web research so the next agent doesn't repay the cost. Talks directly to the hosted MCP endpoint via JSON-RPC — no local MCP server required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, debugging, or improving TBQ3/TB language code for trading correctness, Bar strategy behavior, order direction, position state, sizing, costs, backtest realism, event timing, multi-symbol logic, or function documentation consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and cut the cost of a machine's scheduled routines: measure tokens per run, pick a lever (cheaper model, split, lower frequency, shorter prefix, retire) and prove the saving with a before-and-after measurement. Use when background routines burn more than interactive work. Triggers: /routine-opt, /ropt, routine audit, cheaper routines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI-focused SRE incident response practices for LLM outages, degraded quality, runaway cost events, and safety regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous DevSecOps & FinOps Guardrails. Orchestrates Gemini 3 Flash to audit Linux Kernel patches, Terraform cost drifts, and K8s compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "grow my email list", "design a lead magnet / signup incentive", "set up double opt-in", or "plan a referral / recommendation loop"; produces a list-growth plan — acquisition channels, lead-magnet / incentive concepts, a compliant double-opt-in capture-flow spec, referral-loop mechanics, and subscriber-growth / cost-per-opt-in targets (labeled Estimated) — that feeds SEND-S (consent quality captured at acquisition) and SEND-N (lifecycle entry). Not for the signup page/popup UX itself — use landing-optimizer; not for recording the opt-in — use consent-registry; not for the confirmation-email copy — use email-creative-builder. 邮件列表增长/lead magnet/双重确认/推荐环

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. Also triggers on: PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: positioning, product launch, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select a current video model and endpoint against duration, references, motion, audio, ratio, quality, cost, and continuity requirements using live schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that flattens a nested array into one output document per array element. Use for normalising nested JSON, exploding line items, unpacking tags, or producing one-row-per-item tables from arrays. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (some destinations can `UNNEST` server-side without one). Use when user says "flatten-array derivation", "derivation to explode an array", "transformation to unnest", "derive one row per item", or "flatten nested data with a derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that continuously aggregates metrics (daily totals, running counts, min/max, lifetime revenue) using reduction annotations. Use for real-time dashboards, continuous materialised views, and replacing batch ETL aggregations with streaming. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "aggregation derivation", "derivation to sum daily totals", "running-count derivation", "transformation for min/max per group", "derive lifetime metrics", "aggregate-by-date derivation", or "real-time-dashboard derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that joins two or more collections on a shared key, merging their fields into a single enriched collection. Use for data enrichment, denormalisation, building wide tables for BI, and real-time CDC joins. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (a destination-side SQL join or BI tool view is often simpler). Use when user says "join-collections derivation", "derivation to join two collections", "transformation to enrich with customer data", "derive a wide table", "lookup-join derivation", or "build a join derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation for stateless filtering, field selection, and per-document field transformation. Use for WHERE clauses, projecting fields, computing new fields from existing ones, or data cleansing. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this (renaming alone is usually a projection, not a derivation). Use when user says "filter-transform derivation", "derivation to filter by status", "transformation with WHERE clause", "derive computed fields", "cleanse data with a derivation", or "stateless derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Estuary derivations in Python — async-generator transforms, Pydantic-typed source/output, optional persistent state, and dependency installation via uv. Use for ML/embeddings, async API calls, or any transform where SQL and TypeScript are awkward. Derivations add complexity and cost (and Python derivations require a private/BYOC data plane) — confirm the user wants a Python derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "python derivation", "write a derivation in python", "embed with a python derivation", "ML derivation", "call an API from a derivation", or anything mentioning model2vec / huggingface / pydantic in a derivation context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that maintains a sliding time window of events (e.g. "transfers in the last 24h", "failed logins in the last 5 minutes") using internal SQLite state and readDelay for time-based expiration. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "windowing derivation", "derivation for last-24h events", "rolling-window derivation", "sliding-window transformation", "fraud-detection derivation", "rate-limit derivation", or "time-window derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation with custom SQLite state (internal tables) to make per-document decisions based on accumulated history — account balances, inventory levels, approval workflows, deduplication. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "stateful derivation", "derivation to track balance", "transformation to approve based on state", "derive an approval workflow", "deduplication derivation", or "build a stateful derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。