「decisions」の検索結果

[Code Quality] Use to validate a spec artifact's decisions with the user across three contexts — a freshly-authored Feature Spec (idea-to-spec), an existing canonical spec before PBI decomposition (spec-to-pbi), or a refined idea + §8 test-specs (idea-to-pbi deep mode). Detects the context, walks every applicable validation category, and runs an exhaustive but budget-bounded blocking clarification gate so every non-obvious or conflicting decision is confirmed before the artifact drives downstream work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Utilities] Use when recording an engineering journal entry — capture decisions, blockers, lessons, or progress notes during work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Decision Support] Use when pressure-testing irreversible, high-stakes decisions with adversarial AI advisors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Utilities] Use when applying structured problem-solving frameworks to complex, blocked, recurring, or uncertain decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain stewardship protocol continuity and tool/personality boundaries. Use when a repo agent needs steward-mode threshold checks, self-model update decisions, delegation hygiene, boundary violation review, or handoff-safe continuity context without overclaiming steward personality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestration for repository governance, North Star impact, sub-Star boundaries, and repair-first or evidence-first drift checks. Guides an agent through the complete lifecycle of making architectural decisions, documenting them, writing FAQs, and cleaning up stale plans while adhering strictly to repo ethics and brand tone. Use whenever you need to make a structural change, write an ADR, update the doc lattice, or govern repository architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Steward public stories about any work — creation ethics, application ethics, and maintenance of the story plus its disclosures (generated, drafted, curated, authored). Use when writing a public article, origin story, talk, README narrative, or showcase about how work was made; when publishing ethics and decisions; or when asked who generated vs curated a text. Do not use for ADRs, FAQs, skill citations, or marketing hype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating a new project folder, starter pack, app scaffold, or agent-ready workspace — AGENTS.md, README, TASKS, DECISIONS, PROMPTS, an idempotent bootstrap script, and starter-pack modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade or synchronize Agent Skills, or determine a Skill's source and ownership across runtimes and roots. Use only for those lifecycle decisions. Do not use for installation, creation or editing, validation, inventory, usage statistics, general audits, cleanup, packaging, publishing, or ordinary file and package work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Invoice-Downloader work involves mailbox batch tests, truth audit, regression validation, P0/P1/P2 decisions, packaged frontend acceptance, or clean reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Non-animation creative direction for HyperFrames videos. Use for design spec (frame.md / design.md) handling, palettes, typography, narration, beat planning, audio-reactive visuals, composition patterns, and brand / style decisions. For atomic motion patterns and scene blueprints, use `hyperframes-animation`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize vulnerability remediation using KEV-style exploitation context plus asset criticality. Use for CVE triage, patch order decisions, and remediation reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare model candidates using weighted metrics and deterministic ranking outputs. Use for benchmark leaderboards and model promotion decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech Lead role in AID methodology. Use for architecture decisions, code reviews, technical direction, operational readiness, team guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and stress-test open-source project names, from collision checks to launch-ready decisions. Use when the user asks to name or rename a project, compare candidate names, screen GitHub or package namespace risk, verify language or mythology claims, or improve SEO/GEO clarity. Perform live web and registry research, separate brand from category descriptor, classify collisions, and return one evidence-backed recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for project memory, decisions, handoffs, genome, knowledge index, changelog, and patterns that must persist across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hybrid memory system that provides persistent, searchable knowledge management for AI agents (Architecture, Patterns, Decisions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。