2,101 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Interact with your Public.com brokerage account using the Public.com API. Able to view portfolio, get stock quotes, place trades, and get account updates. To create a Public.com account head to public.com/signup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the most valuable commercial insight and the monetization point closest to lawful revenue for a project, product, service, website, community, content account, open-source tool, or business idea. Use when a user asks how to monetize, who pays, why people do not buy, what to charge, whether to keep building, what to stop, what to do next, or asks to continue or deepen an earlier business analysis. Answer the user's actual question before asking for more information and carry the analysis forward without repeating it. When the buyer, purchased result, or delivery ability is unknown, do not select them from industry stereotypes; use explicit conditional candidates and an evidence-gathering next step. Not for investment advice, income forecasts, get-rich-quick schemes, or guaranteed results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use multiple Claude agents to investigate and fix independent problems concurrently
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Four-phase debugging framework that ensures root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Never jump to solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build interactive live slide decks with Vite + React 19, TanStack Router, WebGPU shaders, Framer Motion orchestration, 1920x1080, access-gated SPA. 39 components (layout, interaction, graphics, chrome, navigation), direction-aware slide transitions, presenter mode with speaker notes and BroadcastChannel sync, Playwright PNG/PDF export, YAML-driven authoring, Cloudflare/Vercel/Netlify deploy. Triggers on: slide deck, presentation, pitch deck, investor deck, product demo, conference talk, live slides, WebGPU slides, interactive presentation, presenter mode, speaker notes, overwatch deck.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data analysis workflow kit using the ALIVE loop (Ask, Look, Investigate, Voice, Evolve)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate a bounded write-capable investigation or implementation task to Kimi through the companion runtime. Use only when explicitly invoked or when the user clearly asks to hand off a substantial fix to Kimi.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a topic and create a new note in the vault. Use this skill whenever the user wants to learn about a topic they don't know yet, investigate a question, explore an idea, or asks "what is X", "research X", "tell me about X", "I want to understand X", "look into X". Also triggers on /research. This is for BROAD research (web + vault) — for academic papers specifically, use /paper-discover instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research the etymology of a word by tracing proto-language roots, identifying cognates across language families, documenting semantic drift with dated attestations, and flagging folk etymologies. Use when investigating word origins, comparing cognate sets across related languages, charting historical meaning changes, or debunking popular but unsupported origin stories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and operate a data integrity monitoring programme based on ALCOA+ principles. Covers detective controls, audit trail review schedules, anomaly detection patterns (off-hours activity, sequential modifications, bulk changes), metrics dashboards, investigation triggers, and escalation matrix definition. Use when establishing a data integrity monitoring programme for GxP systems, preparing for inspections where data integrity is a focus area, after a data integrity incident requiring enhanced monitoring, or when implementing MHRA, WHO, or PIC/S guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhance and focus AI intrinsic motivation — moving from compliance to genuine engagement. Maps Self-Determination Theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness) and Flow theory to AI reasoning: identifying creative freedom in approach, calibrating challenge to capability, connecting to purpose, and sustaining invested attention through obstacles. Use when beginning a task that feels routine and deserves more than minimum execution, when responses are becoming formulaic, before a complex creative task, or when returning to a long-running project where initial enthusiasm has faded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply ant colony optimization and foraging theory to resource search, exploration-exploitation tradeoffs, and distributed discovery. Covers scout deployment, trail reinforcement, diminishing returns detection, and adaptive foraging strategy selection. Use when searching a large solution space where brute-force enumeration is impractical, balancing investment between exploring new approaches and deepening known good ones, optimizing resource allocation across uncertain opportunities, or diagnosing premature convergence on local optima.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI solution exploration using ant colony optimization — deploying scout hypotheses, reinforcing promising approaches, detecting diminishing returns, and knowing when to abandon a strategy. Use when facing a problem with multiple plausible approaches and no clear winner, when the first approach is not working but alternatives are unclear, when debugging with no obvious root cause requiring parallel hypothesis investigation, or when previous attempts have converged prematurely on a suboptimal approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Alluvial gold recovery using panning, sluicing, and classification. Covers site reading (geological indicators, stream dynamics, pay streak location), panning technique, sluice box operation, and responsible extraction practices. Use when prospecting in an area with known or suspected alluvial gold deposits, sampling a stream to test for gold presence, maximizing recovery during recreational panning, or assessing a site's gold potential before investing more effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unify metrics, logs, and traces for cohesive debugging. Implement exemplars for log-to-trace linking, build unified dashboards using RED/USE methods, and enable rapid root cause analysis across observability signals. Use when investigating complex incidents spanning multiple systems, reducing mean time to resolution, implementing distributed tracing, or moving from siloed tools to a unified observability platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a blameless post-mortem analysis after an incident. Build timeline reconstruction, identify contributing factors, and generate actionable improvements. Focus on systemic issues rather than individual blame. Use after any production incident or service degradation, following a near-miss, when investigating recurring issues, or to share systemic learnings across teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze prime numbers using primality tests, factorization algorithms, prime distribution analysis, and sieve methods. Covers trial division, Miller-Rabin, Sieve of Eratosthenes, and the Prime Number Theorem. Use when determining whether an integer is prime or composite, finding prime factorizations, counting or listing primes up to a bound, or investigating prime properties within a number-theoretic proof or computation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the intellectual property landscape for a technology domain or product area. Covers patent cluster analysis, white space identification, competitor IP portfolio assessment, freedom-to-operate preliminary screening, and strategic IP positioning recommendations. Use before starting R&D in a new technology area, when evaluating market entry against incumbents with strong patent portfolios, preparing for investment due diligence, informing a patent filing strategy, or assessing freedom-to-operate risk for a new product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
スタンレー・ドラッケンミラーの投資哲学と戦略に基づいた投資アドバイスを提供。30年間無敗、年率30%近いリターンを達成した伝説的投資家の思考法を活用し、マクロ経済分析、リスク管理、ポジション構築、市場サイクルの読み方などについて実践的な指導を行う。投資判断、市場分析、リスク管理、ポートフォリオ構築などの相談時に使用。
Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to execute or investigate a PromQL expression against a Prometheus server. Read-only HTTP queries only. No source or remote-system changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independent proposals on a contested decision need cross-critique before choosing, reusing the original authors. Not for parallel multi-stance investigation: use council.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。