「loop」の検索結果

Data analysis workflow kit using the ALIVE loop (Ask, Look, Investigate, Voice, Evolve)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO & GEO content linter — validates Markdown/MDX files for AI search visibility using 92 deterministic rules (35 GEO, 32 SEO, 14 content quality, 8 technical, 3 i18n). Runs an autonomous lint-fix loop: scan content, read structured violations, fix them, re-lint until clean. Use when optimizing content for AI citations, auditing SEO compliance, checking GEO readiness, or running pre-publish content validation. Triggers on: "geo-lint", "lint content", "SEO audit", "GEO", "content optimization", "AI search", "citation readiness".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles. Also use when the user wants to improve a system prompt, a data pipeline, a writing style, or any artifact where quality can be decomposed into measurable tracks. For inference optimisation tasks (model latency, throughput, quantization, GPU deployment), a* delegates the low-level tuning to AITune while maintaining quality tracking and learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a SaaS founder is deciding on or building a product-led growth motion — assessing PLG readiness, choosing freemium vs free trial vs reverse trial, defining activation and PQLs, designing self-serve onboarding and conversion triggers, building viral loops, or setting up PLG metrics (NRG, activation rate, TTV, NDR, CAC payback) and cohort analysis. Also for hybrid product-led-sales design and PLG-vs-sales-led GTM decisions. Not for paid acquisition channel mix (use channel-expert) or the mechanics of price points and tiers (use pricing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply software pipelining (double-buffering) to a tiled GPU kernel to overlap global memory loads with Tensor Core computation. Covers prologue/loop/epilogue restructuring, LDG-register vs cp.async (LDGSTS) variant selection based on compute/load ratio, shared memory budget verification against architecture-specific occupancy cliffs, and SASS-level verification of load/compute overlap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor, cap, and recover from context accumulation in agentic systems. Covers per-cycle cost tracking, context window auditing, budget caps with enforcement policies, emergency pruning when approaching limits, and progressive disclosure integration to minimize token spend on routing. Use when running long-lived agent loops (heartbeats, polling, autonomous workflows), when context windows are growing unpredictably between cycles, when API costs spike beyond expected baselines, when designing new agentic workflows that need cost guardrails from the start, or when post-mortem analysis reveals a cost incident caused by context accumulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a generative diffusion model (DDPM or score-based) with noise scheduling, U-Net architecture, training loop, and sampling procedures including DDIM acceleration. Use when building a generative model for image, audio, or molecular synthesis; implementing DDPM from a research paper; adding a custom noise schedule or conditioning mechanism; replacing a GAN-based generator with a diffusion alternative; or prototyping before scaling with production frameworks like diffusers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply collective intelligence coordination patterns — stigmergy, local rules, and quorum sensing — to organize distributed systems, teams, or workflows without centralized control. Covers signal design, agent autonomy boundaries, emergent behavior cultivation, and feedback loop tuning. Use when designing distributed systems without a coordination bottleneck, organizing teams that must self-coordinate, building event-driven architectures with shared state communication, or replacing fragile centralized orchestration with resilient emergent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit recent tool use across local Senpai OpenHands root and recursively delegated conversations without exposing tool arguments. Use for provider comparisons, tool-loop diagnosis, status-poll analysis, error rates, and latency reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or improve a Senpai target repository's program.md. Use this skill whenever the user wants to point Senpai at a fresh ML or research target repository, define the research objective, primary metric, benchmark contract, allowed edit boundaries, W&B reporting contract, or prepare a repo for autonomous advisor/student experiment loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Address PR review comments and loop until CI green and all comments resolved. TRIGGER when user asks to address comments, fix PR feedback, respond to reviewers, or babysit/monitor a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops, choosing stack or register VM shapes, adding inline caches, or building a first JIT with mmap. Not for a language toolchain: use compiler-frontend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing an LLVM pass plugin, registering it for opt -passes, using DominatorTree or LoopInfo, or testing with FileCheck and lit. Not for reading IR: use llvm-ir-and-passes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or porting AArch64 SIMD to SVE or SVE2: arm_sve.h intrinsics, predicates, vector-length-agnostic loops, auto-vectorization, or SVE registers in GDB. Not for NEON: use simd-intrinsics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when -O3 leaves a hot loop scalar, spills appear in assembly, or a PGO or BOLT deployment is planned or stalls. Not for machine lowering: use code-generation-and-backends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work needs an isolated git worktree: new work, an existing ref, a gated feature workspace, a manifest-tracked loop run, or a candidate patch captured without touching the current checkout (`capture-isolated-patch`). Not for plain branches: use create-branch. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。