2,374 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans Cosmos SDK blockchains for 9 consensus-critical vulnerabilities including non-determinism, incorrect signers, ABCI panics, and rounding errors. Use when auditing Cosmos chains or CosmWasm contracts. (project, gitignored)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hedges' 4-kind lattice for bidirectional programming - covariant/contravariant/invariant/bivariant types with GF(3) correspondence
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensemble SOLID review — fans the ruleset across overlapping focused workers over the same code, then reduces by corroboration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce mandatory pre-action verification checkpoints to prevent pattern-matching from overriding explicit reasoning. Use this skill when about to execute implementation actions (Bash, Write, Edit) to verify hypothesis-action alignment. Blocks execution when hypothesis unverified or action targets different system than hypothesis identified. Critical for preventing cognitive dissonance where correct diagnosis leads to wrong implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relay agent results without corrupting exact counts, failure reasons, source scope or status. Use when receiving agent output or handing results to another actor; distinguish observations from attributed conclusions and reference complete artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate pytest failures without treating tests or implementation as automatic authority. Use when diagnosing regressions, debugging test errors, or deciding whether to fix a test or code; trace the contract, product, fixture, and observation before choosing an evidence-backed correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or debugging Typer/Rich CLI applications. Activates on Rich table rendering, console output in non-TTY environments, CliRunner testing with Rich output, snapshot testing, Typer command wiring, exception chain prevention with AppExit/AppExitRich patterns, table width at 80-column wrapping, Progress/Live in non-interactive contexts, stderr/stdout separation, or force_terminal vs width configuration. Grounds AI-generated CLI code in verified correctness patterns and prevents known Typer/Rich integration mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates and corrects Python shebangs and PEP 723 inline script metadata by applying four shebang-selection rules. Use when auditing or fixing shebangs in Python files — choosing between plain python3 and the uv shebang for standalone scripts with external dependencies, adding or removing PEP 723 metadata blocks to match actual import requirements, checking execute bit presence, or avoiding redundant transitive dependencies when typer is declared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when debugging software, investigating incidents, diagnosing flaky tests, or analyzing performance regressions — enforces structured observation recording with evidence IDs, causality validation, and verification gates to prevent correlation-causation pollution. Use when an agent might otherwise summarize or speculate instead of reporting observed evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides agent selection criteria, workflow patterns (TDD, feature addition, code review, refactoring, debugging), quality gates, and python-cli-architect vs stdlib-scripting routing for Python engineering tasks. Activated by python-engineering:orchestrate at Step 1 before any task is routed. Also activates when an orchestrator needs to select the correct Python specialist agent or chain agents across a multi-step Python workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design pattern for converting rule-following, checklist, or rubric skills into a fan-out map-reduce ensemble of parallel rigid sub-agents with corroboration-weighted merge; worker model tier and diversity are knobs matched to inference load and stakes, not fixed values. Apply when creating or refactoring a skill or agent that applies 10+ independent criteria in a single pass. Triggers on: 'review against a checklist', 'fan out', 'map reduce review', 'ensemble', 'split the rules', 'apply rubric', or any large ruleset being applied by one agent in one pass. NOT for tight single-pass transforms or rulesets under 5 criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and refactor oversized or multi-domain skills. First determines whether splitting or references/ extraction is appropriate — then executes the correct action. Use when a skill exceeds token thresholds (SK006/SK007) or covers multiple independent domains. Performs candidate assessment before any structural changes; cohesive single-intent skills are redirected to references/ extraction instead of splitting. When splitting is warranted — domain analysis gate, split plan, new SKILL.md generation, validation, and backwards-compatible facade conversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit agent lifecycle — validates agent execution capability against configuration. Accepts plugin path, runs 8 semantic audits (capability vs config alignment, skill loading correctness, inter-agent contracts, prompt contradictions, tool sufficiency, dead agents, scriptable patterns, pattern learning), writes reports to .plugin-creator/audits/. Use when auditing agent lifecycle, checking agent capabilities, verifying tool access, finding dead agents, validating agent contract alignment, or confirming agents can execute workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when investigating failing tests or deciding whether to change the test or product. Validate test expectations against authoritative intent, trace product and test boundaries, and require evidence for the correction rather than automatic code fixes or test dismissal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and run configured quality gates for requested or changed work, preserve diagnostics as evidence, route failures to the appropriate causal/domain capability, and verify corrections. Use for linting, formatting, type-checking, configured hook checks, or pre-completion quality verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a code change for correctness-maintainability defects not owned by a narrower security/performance/accessibility perspective. Use for an independent quality perspective on a defined change set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews CLI application code for correctness and quality. Use when reviewing tools that use argparse, click, typer, commander.js, or similar argument parsers — covers exit codes, help flags, stdin/stdout/stderr separation, non-interactive operation, signal handling, argument validation, ANSI color safety, and dry-run support for destructive operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes to the correct dh skill entry point by intent. Use when unsure which development-harness skill to invoke, starting a development workflow, or invoking /dh directly. Covers capture, groom, plan, execute, single task, quality gates, and milestone routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creative reasoning framework for ill-defined problems where conventional solutions are suboptimal. Use when the problem has ambiguous goals, vast solution space, no single correct answer, or requires innovation. Implements three paradigms — combinational (novel combinations of familiar ideas), exploratory (expand solution space boundaries), transformative (alter fundamental constraints). Do not use for well-defined problems, mathematical puzzles, or tasks requiring convergent reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review documentation for quality, clarity, SEO, and technical correctness. Optimized for Docus/Nuxt Content but works with any Markdown documentation. Use when asked to: "review docs", "check documentation", "audit docs", "validate documentation", "improve docs quality", "analyze documentation", "check my docs", "review my documentation pages", "validate MDC syntax", "check for SEO issues", "analyze doc structure". Provides actionable recommendations categorized by priority (Critical, Important, Nice-to-have).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments, covering question wording, scale construction and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting and soft launches, respondent burden with attention and speeding rules, sensitive questions and social-desirability bias, and treatment delivery. Use when the user writes or revises survey questions, chooses a scale, orders blocks, plans a pilot, or worries respondents will not answer honestly. Indirect measurement goes to list-experiment, multi-country instruments to cross-national-design, and live-survey operations to qualtrics-ops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。