「plan」の検索結果

Plan, draft, audit, and publish LinkedIn posts and comments. Use when the user wants to write a viral LinkedIn post, draft a comment or reply on any LinkedIn post URL, audit a draft against 2026 algorithm heuristics, remove AI tells, extract hook formulas from viral posts, or plan a week of content. Powered by the Publora API for publishing. User provides post/comment URLs, skill drafts content, user approves, then publishes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate natural language to SQL, optimize query performance, and interpret EXPLAIN plans for SQLite and PostgreSQL. Triggered when users ask to convert questions into SQL, improve slow queries, tune indexes, analyze execution plans, or mention keywords like NL2SQL, query tuning, or full table scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is discussing daily research work, TODOs, plans, standups, meetings, milestones, or general project progress that should be reflected in Obsidian daily notes, plan notes, and hub updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm research ideas", "use 5W1H framework", "identify research gaps", "conduct gap analysis", "start research project", "conduct literature review", "define research question", "select research method", "plan research", or mentions research project initiation phase. Provides comprehensive guidance for research startup workflow from idea generation to planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform research descriptions into well-structured implementation plans following project conventions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope a feature end to end and write an implementation spec under specs/ from an accepted proposal — current-system mapping, goals/non-goals, a Decision Log for one-way-door choices, a live Open Questions backlog, and a real migration + test plan. Read when asked to write a spec, scope this feature, turn this proposal into a spec, plan the implementation, or break this into tasks. Do NOT fire on frame a proposal or write the PRD (sibling frame-a-proposal — a PRD frames a change before it is accepted; this skill starts once one is), record a decision or write the ADR (record-a-decision), write a postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or review this design (review-a-design) — those are separate skills. Complements the platform open-knowledge skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and review ChatGPT Ads experiments without assuming ad inventory, account access, or platform capabilities. Use for ChatGPT advertising, OpenAI ads, conversational ad concepts, ChatGPT campaign plans, or performance reviews from a verified export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

实践认识论：把方案、假说或判断放回实践中检验，按「实践 → 认识 → 再实践」螺旋迭代，并在开始前写明循环终止条件。当你提出了假说要验证、一次尝试失败要复盘再来、发现自己只想不做或只做不想时触发；一次性输出、答案可直接查阅、还没形成假说（先调查）时不触发。 English: Practice-cognition loop. Test a hypothesis or plan in practice, learn from the result, and iterate in a rising spiral with an explicit stop condition. Trigger when a plan needs validation, an attempt failed and must be retried, or you notice thinking without doing (or doing without thinking); skip for one-shot outputs, lookup questions, or before any hypothesis exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。 English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

群众路线：从持有真实情况的多方（用户、使用者、代码库、日志、运行结果）收集分散意见，系统化为方案，再带回去对齐与检验，循环改进。当多方意见分歧、需要汇总零散反馈、方案要拿回给真实使用者确认、或你发觉自己在闭门造车时触发；信息源单一且完整、处于执行阶段时不触发。 English: Mass line. Collect scattered input from everyone who holds ground truth (users, operators, codebase, logs, runtime results), synthesize it into a coherent plan, take it back for alignment and validation, and iterate. Trigger when inputs conflict, feedback must be consolidated, a plan needs sign-off from real users, or you sense you are designing in isolation; skip when there is a single complete source and the work is pure execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down implementation plans into actionable task lists. Use after planning to create a structured task breakdown. Generates tasks.md with ordered, dependency-aware tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to create or edit videos end-to-end (script→video, auto-cut/jumpcut, captions/subtitles, polishing for Shorts/Reels/TikTok). Current implemented backend: local FFmpeg (probe/render/jumpcut/burn-subtitles/polish). Planned/optional backends: Remotion (motion graphics templates), VectCutAPI (CapCut/剪映 timeline editing), and video-audio-mcp (MCP tool wrapper) when available. Produces a finished video artifact (MP4 by default) from assets + copy + a design/storyboard plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or redesign self-contained single-file HTML artifacts with a visual direction shaped by the user's brief, project, and subject. Use when HTML is the deliverable for a report, explainer, landing page, presentation, tool, mixed artifact, or broad request. This is the collection's only implicit router. Route clear wireframe, prototype, mockup, plan, or diagram requests to the matching direct-invocation specialist when available. Do not use for ordinary application implementation when a standalone HTML file is not the deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design principles and creative direction for building HTML artifacts — pages, reports, plans, landing pages, demos, decks, and small tools. Use when creating or restyling any visual HTML deliverable and deciding its palette, type pairing, layout, theming, or overall register, or when the output must not look generically AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an auditable grid from a price range, current price and capital. Use when the user asks to grid plan with AlphaGBM. Use the bundled Python runner; never silently replace real results with demos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --all to skip area selection and discuss all gray areas interactively. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (Claude picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。