「the」の検索結果

Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Print the localhost URL for The Luminarium — moflo's daemon dashboard — for the current project. Use when the user asks for "the luminarium link", "the moflo dashboard", "the daemon UI", or anything synonymous. Each project gets a deterministic port in 33000–33999; the actual bound port is recorded in `.moflo/daemon.lock`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and curate the `learnings` memory namespace — the one namespace nothing re-derives, so the only one that rots. Runs moflo's mechanical audit to nominate stale, unused, and near-duplicate entries, then decides entry by entry whether to keep, retire, compress, or merge, and propagates the result to the shared artifact. Use when memory search returns stale or duplicated hits, after retiring a big chunk of work whose supporting entries went stale with it, or as a periodic pass once the namespace passes a few hundred entries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify-before-done — exercise the current change end-to-end against its acceptance criteria (the SDD plan's, or the ticket's) and report a per-criterion PASS/FAIL verdict, then record the outcome to memory. This is the concrete action that satisfies moflo's verify-before-done gate (`gates.verify_before_done` / `/flo -v` / `/flo -sd`). Use before `gh pr create` when the change must be proven to work, not just tested in passing. Verifies only — it does not fix; on FAIL it reports the gaps and stops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage the project's TODO list in .unikit/TODO.md — capture work to remember for later, not to do right now. Use it to add a deferred item, mark a todo complete, or show the list. The point is to park tasks you don't want to act on in the moment but don't want to forget. Trigger on "add a todo", "add this to the todo list", "put X on the todo list", "remind me to...", "don't forget to...", "note this for later", "we should do this later", "mark this todo done", "what's on the todo list", "what's left to do". This is only for parking reminders — to actually plan or do the work now, use /unikit-plan, /unikit-implement, or /unikit-devcontext.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate the project's knowledge base and memory in .unikit/memory/ — the indexed reference library of coding standards and framework usage patterns. ALWAYS use this skill whenever the user adds knowledge from a source: a URL, a file, a folder path, a PDF, an article, or a book — any path/link/document is a strong signal for the knowledge base, not a quick rule. Also use it to research or document how the project uses a framework, or to add a researched core/stack knowledge entry. Sub-commands by phrasing: "migrate the rules" or "promote rules" runs migrate-rules; "optimize the knowledge base" or "optimize the rules" runs optimise (extract large sections into references); "validate" re-syncs RULES_INDEX.md; "--module <id>" targets a module. For a quick one-line convention or correction typed as a prompt ("always do X", "never use Y", "remember this") with no source, use /unikit-rules; for architecture decisions use ARCHITECTURE.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE for any real runtime debugging across ANY language or binary — crashes, silent failures, wrong responses, stuck processes, memory leaks, async misbehavior, unexplained timing, reverse engineering. Runs a hypothesis-driven loop: form ≥3 hypotheses, investigate in parallel, after 2 failed rounds spawn Oracles from orthogonal angles, confirm root cause, lock with a failing test, fix minimally, QA by actually USING the system, scrub artifacts. The actual HOW lives in `references/` — READ THEM. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X not working', 'hanging', 'attach a debugger', 'reverse engineer', 'pwndbg', 'gdb', 'lldb', 'node inspect', 'tsx debug', 'pdb', 'dlv', 'delve', 'rust-gdb', 'set a breakpoint', 'context window exploded', 'why is the response empty', 'attach the debugger', 'debug it', 'why is this happening', 'trace this bug', 'reproduce and fix', 'silent failure', 'HTTP 200 but empty', 'why did it stop', 'inspect the binary', 'reverse engineering', 'playwright'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and maintain the learnings in `docs/solutions/` against the current codebase — fix drifted paths and links, merge overlapping docs, replace guidance the code no longer supports, delete obsolete docs, reconcile the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary, then report and commit. Also bootstraps `CONCEPTS.md` on request and, when asked, culls docs whose reasoning the code already explains. Use for "refresh the learnings", "audit docs/solutions", "are our solution docs still accurate", "clean up / prune the learnings", "create a CONCEPTS.md", or after a refactor, rename, migration, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated documented solutions. Not for capturing a new learning — use `learn-with-docs`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**導入済みの sparkle-design プロジェクト**で、ユーザーが目指したい「雰囲気」を 自然言語で伝えたら、`sparkle.config.json` の primary / font-pro / font-mono / radius を 書き換えて `sparkle-design-cli generate` まで実行するスキル。選択肢は Theme Settings Figma プラグインが扱える範囲（primary 7 色 / radius 8 段階 / fonts 11 種）に揃えて おり、Figma と CLI の見た目がずれません。**未導入プロジェクトの初期セットアップは `setup-sparkle-design`（internal 環境では `install-sparkle-design`）を使うこと。** 「雰囲気を変えたい」「もっとポップに」「ビジネスライクに」「高級感を出したい」 「primary を変えたい」「角丸をもっと丸く」「フォントを変えたい」「テーマを提案して」 「テナントごとに配色を変えたい」「役割ごとに色を出し分けたい」（後者2つは複数 バリアント要望として範囲外に誘導するために発動） で発動。English: "change the vibe", "make it more playful", "make it more business-like", "adjust the theme", "change primary color".

Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures git branches and worktrees: keeps unrelated changes on separate branches, isolates each in its own worktree created so the repository's setup runs, records dependencies with git-machete, and recombines them into a temporary mixdown branch for local testing. Use before creating any branch or worktree in a codebase that works on more than one branch, including branching off the default branch to start a change; when starting work in a fork, clone, or third-party checkout; when choosing what a new branch should be based on; when a branch is growing a second unrelated concern; when deciding whether to stack branches or keep them independent; when preparing a change for a pull request or patch submission; when handed an existing worktree or branch to implement and commit in a fork; or when a local build needs several in-progress branches combined. Not needed where the repository clearly commits everything to the trunk, or holds notes or personal data rather than code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-causes one specific mistake the agent just made, such as not committing despite instructions to, by checking it against the loaded AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and Beads memories, delegating the investigation to a separate agent where the harness supports one; proposes concrete context improvements, and lets the user choose which to apply and how to remediate. Use when the user invokes `/learn` or `$learn`, with or without a description of the mistake, including `/learn /qs`-style shorthand naming the corrective command. For a broad end-of-session documentation sweep, use `documentation-updates` (`/reflect`) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a plan directory (plan.md + phase-*.md) needs a visual review. By DEFAULT this drives the STRUCTURED visual-plan artifact (visual-plan/plan.json) via the mewkit visual-plan CLI — generate if absent, validate, open the local studio (view/edit), and export plan.html from the approved artifact. Pass --static for the legacy prompt-only single-file plan.html template render. Triggers on "render this plan", "visualize the plan", "open the plan studio", "make a shareable plan page", "plan.html". This is the canonical owner of plan-as-visual-review. NOT for plan critique or scope review (see mk:plan-ceo-review / mk:validate-plan), NOT for generic code/diagram/diff visuals (see mk:preview), NOT for live media generation (see mk:multimodal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify the brief BEFORE any design work to avoid building the wrong thing. Interrogates goal, user, constraints, success criteria, and scope, then writes a short context doc the other design skills consume. Use when the user says "let's design X", "build a UI for Y", "get context", "clarify the brief", or kicks off any product-design task without a clear spec. First stage of the Product Design set — highest leverage for reducing rework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge Codex to web-based AI model products by packaging local task context, scrub-checking it, sending it through an approved browser surface to ChatGPT Pro, Claude, Grok, Gemini, or another web model, waiting for the answer, and returning the model response to the user or Codex. Also guide DevSpace-like MCP Connector Mode when the user wants ChatGPT Pro or another MCP-capable web host to access approved local workspaces without relying on Codex browser automation. Use when the user asks for GPT Pro, ChatGPT Pro, Claude web, Grok, Gemini web, web model bridge, external model consult, ask another model, second opinion, use a web AI model, browserless agent access to GPT Pro, MCP connector, DevSpace-like workflow, or send local repo context to a browser-based model for planning, review, debugging, architecture discussion, or implementation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the "Report Sources" child page for a finished Weekly Community Signal report — an evidence-backed defense of WHY every item landed in the column/section/rank it did. The agent argues each placement like a lawyer (claim → evidence → rule → rebuttal) but is under oath: it CANNOT invent, spin, or overstate — every claim ties to a verifiable fact (issue #, label, PR type, quoted comment, npm output, the front-door test). Not CYA — it's so Nathan can defend the report with facts and see the exact reasoning behind each call. Runs after the report (invoked by weekly-report, last steps) and on "report sources", "defend the report", "why is this here".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Testing] Use when you need to drive an integration-test suite to fully green — each round runs /integration-test-verify (whole system by default, or the target named in the prompt), and on ANY failure combines /debug-investigate + /integration-test-review (report-only) to adjudicate the fault (test wrong · test not optimal · source wrong), then /fix to resolve it at the owning layer, then /changes-review on that round's fix diff, then re-runs a FRESH full verify — looping until the whole suite passes its 2-consecutive-green-runs gate with zero failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before improving anything, show the spread of what can concretely be done on this specific input — a short menu of 3-5 interventions from lightest to heaviest touch, then wait for the user to pick. Domain-agnostic; works on any material the user hands over. Trigger when the user says "spread", "show me my options", "what can you do with this", or asks to improve or fix something without specifying how. Do NOT trigger when the user has already named a specific fix — then just do the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, refactoring, or debugging a macOS menu bar app with SwiftUI, or when a MenuBarExtra misbehaves — the icon renders wrong or vanishes, the Settings window opens behind other apps, the popover cannot be closed, controls inside a .menu style do not render, the Dock icon comes back, or the app quits when the item is dragged off the menu bar. Triggers include menu bar app, status bar app, tray app, MenuBarExtra, NSStatusItem, LSUIElement, hide Dock icon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by create-issue, create-issue-from-issue-number, and update-issue. It formats an implementation-ready GitHub Issue body, runs the pre-posting checklist, executes `gh issue create` or `gh issue edit`, and optionally posts a 確認事項 follow-up comment. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the three parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has completed analysis. If a user asks to 'format an issue body' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/create-issue, /create-issue-from-issue-number, or /update-issue) rather than invoking this one directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build one release phase against the specs — plan it on an interactive board (endpoints, components, resources, with what already exists read from the codebase), let the user adjust, then build node by node while the board shows live progress. Use when the user wants to build a phase, implement the phase-1 slice, execute the plan from a story map or spec, or watch a build happen visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。