「track」の検索結果

Own MSBuild generated-artifact integration. USE FOR: a target that creates or should create source, Content, None, or another physical file but the artifact is missing from compilation or output; target timing; evaluation-time glob misses; $(IntermediateOutputPath) placement; and FileWrites clean tracking. The prompt may describe the generated artifact without naming the producing task. DO NOT USE when the primary defect is general Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata or batching, duplicate/overlapping declarations, or a generated-item identity relationship; use item-management. Exclude Roslyn source-generator internals and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own concrete MSBuild ItemGroup and item-expression questions. USE FOR: Include, Remove, Update, item identity and metadata, transforms, filtering, batching, duplicate or overlapping items, and reviews that verify whether those operations are correct. Generated items stay in scope when the central defect is item identity, metadata, batching, duplicate declarations, or glob/Remove/Update semantics. For a generated artifact missing from compilation or output, wrong target timing/path, or FileWrites clean tracking without a broader item-semantics defect, use including-generated-files. The item operation may be broken, suspected, or already correct. Exclude property-only issues, general incrementality with no item question, broad reviews with no concrete item concern, and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild import and hook discovery. USE FOR: CustomBefore/CustomAfter hooks, ordered wildcard and NuGet auto-imports, control properties, build/buildTransitive packed layout, package ID and file-name matching, per-TFM forwarders, and tracing why assets or hooks are missing, broken, or replaced. An import guard remains in scope when it is one defect in a broader hook/import flow. DO NOT USE for a focused safety verdict on whether one specific Import needs Exists or is an intentionally unguarded package contract; use msbuild-antipatterns. NEVER INVOKE when imports and hook placement already work and the request is only target Inputs/Outputs, incremental skipping, or FileWrites clean tracking; use incremental-build or target-authoring. Exclude props-versus-targets placement and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors your ads for early signs of fatigue before performance fully collapses. Tracks frequency buildup, CTR decay, CPM increases, and engagement drops across all active creatives and tells you which ones need rotation now vs next week. Platform: Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks daily spend against monthly budget targets across all campaigns and accounts. Tells you exactly where you'll land at current pace, flags campaigns that are over or underspending, and calculates the daily budget adjustments needed to hit your target by month end. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track how AI assistants describe your brand over time and catch wrong, outdated, or damaging claims. Claude builds your monitoring prompt set, compares runs week over week, and drafts the correction plan when answers drift. Platform: AI visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta/Facebook/Instagram Ads campaign structure analysis detecting creative fatigue, audience overlap, scaling opportunities, and iOS tracking verification issues. Use when pasting Meta account data, analyzing Facebook ad performance, reviewing Instagram campaigns, or requesting audit of social advertising spend. Platform: Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track which of your LinkedIn comments earned author replies. Flags the 6-24h warm-reply window where thread momentum peaks, classifies threads as hot/warm/cool/dormant, and routes warm ones to linkedin-reply-handler for follow-up drafts. Powered by Apify, no LinkedIn login. Triggers on "what threads need follow-up", "author replied", "monitor my comments". Not for analyzing likers on a post (use linkedin-engager-analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull the people who liked or commented on any LinkedIn post and segment them by ICP fit (peer / aspirational / prospect / other). Produces an engager roster, tier breakdown, and outbound action lists (follow back, comment-drop, DM-able with one-line openers). Powered by Apify, no LinkedIn login. Triggers on "who liked my post", "who engaged", "engagers report", "audience analytics". Not for tracking author replies to your comments (use linkedin-thread-monitor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate any Obsidian vault as a living, self-rewriting second brain (an evolution of Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: sources rewrite existing pages, contradictions reconcile automatically, scheduled agents maintain the vault while you sleep). Use this skill whenever the user asks Claude to read, write, update, search, or manage their Obsidian vault - including saving notes from conversation, creating daily entries, updating kanban boards, logging dev work, managing people notes, capturing decisions, tracking deals, or maintaining any vault structure. Also triggers when the user wants to bootstrap a new vault from scratch, run a vault health check, or drop a _CLAUDE.md into their vault so all Claude surfaces share the same operating rules. Also runs Crew (/crew): one shared logbook so Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Grok Bot know what each other did, in any plain folder or the vault. Includes a research toolkit (7 commands: /x-read, /x-pulse, /research, /research-deep, /notebooklm, /youtube, /podcast) for AI-powered research via Grok, Perplexity, NotebookLM, YouTube, and podcast feeds - findings save to the vault automatically following the AI-first vault rule. Use proactively whenever the conversation produces information worth preserving (decisions, people met, projects started, tasks completed, lessons learned, research findings).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about academic literature, research papers, scholarly works, authors, citations, institutions, journals, or any academic metadata. Trigger when users want to search for papers, find author profiles, track citations, discover related works, or explore academic topics. Also use when users mention DOIs, ORCIDs, h-index, publication venues, or research metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage tasks with Claude Code native tools — use to track TODOs, delegate work, and monitor progress

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track project blockers, bugs, and gaps across sessions — use when issues pile up or need triage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persist design documents with branch tracking, revision chains, and cross-session discovery

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a person's public track record and give a short credibility assessment. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /who-is-this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine what a file claims about itself and what it actually contains — powered by Apache Tika. True content-based type detection (extensions lie), provenance claims (authors, dates, creating application), revision and tamper signals (PDF incremental updates, tracked changes, hidden slides, zip integrity), hidden and embedded content (attachments, macros), risk indicators (PDF JavaScript actions, encryption), and content digests. Evidence gathering, not verdicts: Tika reports what the file asserts and what parsing observed; it does not attribute authorship or validate signatures. Use for triaging suspicious files, provenance questions, e-discovery-style review, or "is this file what it claims to be."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks Codex to research, find learning materials, process "素材：" links, "请你读" / "精读" a material, build a material radar, or use multi-source information retrieval for career learning and Agent infra tracking. Do not use the career/Agent-infra routing bias for user-directed `整理笔记` into a named note.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and synthesize current AI hotspots into a bilingual HTML daily report. Use when the user says "AI热点", asks for AI日报/AI日报 HTML/AI hot topics, or wants the best recent AI products, papers, viewpoints, and cognition-shifting items from AI/news aggregators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a read-only, evidence-based paid-media performance review across connected platforms or supplied exports. Use for weekly or monthly reports, scorecards, performance, CPA, ROAS, CTR, spend trends, pacing, or conversion-tracking health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO drift monitoring — snapshot a site's SEO state and detect regressions over time. Captures a baseline (rankings/positions, indexed page count, titles & meta descriptions, canonical/robots directives, schema presence, key on-page elements) and on later runs diffs against it to surface what changed: ranking drops, pages that fell out of the index, titles/metas that were accidentally overwritten (a CMS/redeploy classic), canonicals or noindex flipped, schema that disappeared. Use this skill when the user wants to monitor SEO over time, catch regressions after a site change / migration / redeploy, set a baseline, diff against a previous state, or asks "what changed on my site's SEO" or "did my redesign break SEO". Trigger on: "SEO drift", "SEO monitoring", "track SEO over time", "did my site change break SEO", "after migration SEO", "SEO regression", "baseline my SEO", "compare SEO to last month", "my titles changed", "pages fell out of the index". For a one-time full audit use /seo-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and, after explicit approval, execute runtime-behavior probes for local or live integrations. Use only when explicitly invoked to verify behavior that code review and normal tests cannot settle; define a controlled validation matrix, keep disposable JS probes outside tracked paths, and report observed evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。