「audit」の検索結果

Audits any domain's AI-readiness by using curl to directly probe robots.txt, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt, then scores each file against a structured checklist and delivers a formatted report with pass/warn/fail findings and actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever a user provides a domain or URL and wants to know if llms.txt or llms-full.txt is available, discoverable, or properly structured. Trigger on phrases like "check llms.txt for", "does this site have llms.txt", "find llms.txt", "check llms for this url", "audit llms.txt", "is llms-full.txt available", or any time a user shares a domain/docs URL and wants AI-readiness checked. Also trigger when the user wants to verify GEO/AEO readiness of a documentation site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Counts and compares blog posts across a target and competitors, audits content freshness via sitemap lastmod dates, and maps competitor organic keywords (US, non-branded, informational) against the target to surface ranking gaps. Use when asked to compare blog counts, content volume, publishing cadence, content freshness, keyword mapping, keyword gap analysis, or competitor keyword reports — e.g. "how many blog posts does X have vs Y", "how fresh is content on X", "where does [target] rank for [competitor] keywords", "keyword gap between X and Y". Works from company names alone. Always use for blog comparison, freshness audits, and keyword mapping tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite an X (Twitter) profile end-to-end for 2026: bio (160 chars), display name with a searchable keyword, @handle, header image, pinned tweet, link, and location. Triggers on "review my X profile", "fix my bio", "rewrite my Twitter bio", "optimize my header", "pin the right tweet", "X profile audit". Turns a default profile into one that converts visitors into followers. Not for writing tweets (use x-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove the AI tells human readers react to in a tweet or thread: 2026 vocabulary by density, reveal bridges, staccato stacks, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Also --mode audit (280-char fit and format), --mode profile (learns how you write) and --mode interview (fills your Story Bank: the numbers, turning points and positions posts are made of). Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer). Keywords: humanize, de-AI tweet, AI slop, interview me, audit before posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a long-form X (Twitter) thread (tweetstorm) using a 2026 thread formula (listicle-thread, story thread, curiosity-gap opener, how-I teardown), picked by goal (bookmarks, likes, reposts, replies). Structures tweet 1 as a promise plus open loop, paces one beat per tweet, and closes for the repost. Publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a numbered (1/N) thread. Not for single tweets (use x-post-writer) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repurpose existing content into a native X (Twitter) post or thread. Take a LinkedIn post, blog, YouTube script, or newsletter and rewrite it for X: re-hook for the no-fold first line, refit to 280 chars or a thread, strip off-platform artifacts, run the humanizer, publish via Publora on approval. Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer or x-thread-builder), not for auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a single tweet or short auto-thread for X (Twitter) using a 2026 X hook formula (one-liner contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, mini-list, relatable cold-open), picked by goal (replies, reposts, likes, bookmarks). Respects the 280-char limit (25,000 on Premium), runs the humanizer pass, and publishes via Publora on approval. Use to write a tweet from notes. Not for long threads (use x-thread-builder) or auditing a draft (use x-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holistic state-of-the-project check covering unmerged branches, stalled PRs, failed GitHub Actions, stale builds, plan drift (TODOS.md / ROADMAP), unreleased commits, and log errors. Runs read-only investigation, presents a grouped checklist, fixes only after explicit user confirmation. Aware of the Cathier iOS app workflow (Xcode + fastlane + auto-merge @claude PRs from in-app feedback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a stale, inherited, or messy codebase — deps, bugs, security, tests, CI, docs, UI/UX — then emit a phased, testable modernization plan. Read-only: plans upgrades, never applies them. Not for single-PR review, PRD-to-tasks, or UX-only audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI usability using Steve Krug's principles and produce a scannable report. Use for UX audits of screenshots, URLs, or code. Don't use for brand critique, WCAG audits, or backend/API review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit semantic and keyboard accessibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit launch readiness; report ship/no-ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs copy-only orchestration DAG. Use for one high-stakes piece strangers will read that has to be true: a landing page, launch post, blog post, email, X thread, docs page, README, ad, or store listing, researched, fact-audited, adversarially reviewed, and gated for publish readiness in one pass. The audit targets what the agents invent, never what the requester supplied: their own statements are given, and no phase may verify, hedge, or gate on them. Reads the live surface; never publishes. NOT FOR: multi-surface campaign writing (use johnny-suede-write); changing code (use suede-graph-flo-xr); one surface in one pass with no research (use suede-copy); stripping AI patterns from existing text (use suede-deslop); bulk generation of many independent pieces (private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack: suede-codex-fleet).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Context-aware line edit that strips generic AI writing patterns without flattening the author's voice, plus a findings-only audit mode that names issues instead of rewriting. Applies contextual rules rather than blanket bans on adverbs, passive voice, and punctuation, and locks facts, numbers, quotes, code, links, and the supplied house style before it touches a sentence. Use before copy, a README, an email, a social post, or a doc ships; after a long assisted-writing session; when the text sounds fine but feels generated; or when the user asks for a findings-only slop audit. NOT FOR: writing new copy from scratch; deciding whether a person or a model wrote text; changing or certifying facts, which must be checked against primary evidence before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned programmatic SEO discipline. Use when designing data-backed keyword, location, directory, integration, or comparison pages at scale, including templates, index-worthiness gates, internal links, and rollout checks. NOT FOR: auditing an existing site (use suede-seo-audit), planning editorial content (use suede-content-strategy), or publishing bulk pages without approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned conversion-path discipline for pages. Turns a page into a conversion path: hero, friction, proof, CTA, pricing, A/B ideas, quick wins, and mobile CRO. Use when a live or drafted page needs conversion-rate work on its structure and persuasion path. NOT FOR: a scored SEO/AI-visibility audit (use suede-seo-audit); a fast launch-appeal grade (use suede-visibility-grader); writing the copy itself (use suede-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a website, PWA, dashboard, or marketplace into an iOS app. Use when the user has a live site or web app and asks to put it on the App Store, wrap it in an app, ship an iOS version, or convert a PWA to native. Covers URL audit, shell-vs-native strategy, App Store Guideline 4.2 wrapper-rejection risk, native value requirements, screenshots, metadata, privacy answers, and the release gate. Not for: building a native iOS app when no website exists; repairing or releasing an existing Capacitor shell; Android conversions; or keyword and listing audits on an app that already shipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned launch-appeal grader for public pages. Grades findability, first-screen clarity, CTA pull, proof quality, design signal, and AI citation readiness. Use when a public page needs a fast A-F visibility grade before or after launch. NOT FOR: the deep nine-lane SEO audit with rewrite fixes (use suede-seo-audit); implementing conversion changes (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by AI answer engines (use suede-ai-seo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs full writing stack: sharper copy for docs, pages, email, social, headlines, CTAs, product listings, and public explainers, with an SEO/AEO/AI EO pass, persona and framework selection, brand-voice alignment, and a scored ship gate. Use when a writing job spans more than one surface, needs a voice retune as well as a draft, needs discoverability metadata alongside the copy, when the document is one an agent reads such as a SKILL.md, CLAUDE.md, or AGENTS.md, or when the user asks for 'the full writing stack', a launch package, or a public explainer talk-track. NOT FOR: one standalone conversion surface in one pass (use suede-copy); stripping AI patterns from text you did not write (use suede-deslop); a researched multi-phase piece for a high-stakes public surface (use suede-ship-copy); a deep standalone SEO audit (use suede-seo-audit); copy that ships inside a design or layout build (use johnny-suede-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated directory distribution strategy for selecting listings, sequencing submissions, tailoring positioning, and verifying backlinks. Use when a product needs startup, SaaS, AI, MCP, marketplace, or review-directory submissions and a measurable tracker. NOT FOR: broader launch orchestration (use suede-launch-packaging), scalable destination-page production (use suede-programmatic-seo), or citation and search auditing (use suede-seo-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned content-strategy discipline for audience questions, content pillars, topic clusters, editorial priorities, cadence, distribution, refreshes, and stop-doing decisions. Use when deciding what to publish, why it deserves resources, and how the portfolio compounds. NOT FOR: writing an individual asset (use suede-copy), technical or on-page SEO audits (use suede-seo-audit), or social-channel production (use suede-social).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。