「ros」の検索結果

Analyzes recent CI failures on pull requests to identify flaky tests, using retry outcomes (failed attempt → green re-run) and cross-PR recurrence as evidence, and maintains a local longitudinal ledger so flakiness can be tracked over time. TRIGGER when: the user wants to find flaky tests, correlate recent CI failures, check which tests fail across PRs or recover on retry, or refresh the flakiness trend report. DO NOT TRIGGER when: babysitting a single PR's CI until green → monitoring-pull-requests; diagnosing or fixing one specific failing test → the bug-analysis skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build event streaming and real-time data pipelines with Kafka, Pulsar, Redpanda, Flink, and Spark. Covers producer/consumer patterns, stream processing, event sourcing, and CDC across TypeScript, Python, Go, and Java. When building real-time systems, microservices communication, or data integration pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build per-chapter (H2) writing briefs (NO PROSE) so the final survey reads like a paper (chapter leads + cross-H3 coherence) without inflating the ToC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Roslynk for semantic inspection and edits of *.cs, *.razor and *.cshtml solution files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symbolicate the .NET runtime frames in an Android tombstone file. Extracts BuildIds and PC offsets from the native backtrace, downloads debug symbols from the Microsoft symbol server, and runs llvm-symbolizer to produce function names with source file and line numbers. USE FOR triaging a .NET MAUI or Mono Android app crash from a tombstone, resolving native backtrace frames in libmonosgen-2.0.so or libcoreclr.so to .NET runtime source code, or investigating SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, or other native signals originating from the .NET runtime on Android. DO NOT USE FOR pure Java/Kotlin crashes, managed .NET exceptions that are already captured in logcat, or iOS crash logs. INVOKES Symbolicate-Tombstone.ps1 script, llvm-symbolizer, Microsoft symbol server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering. USE FOR: .NET architecture choices; layer and domain boundary review; service decomposition; clean architecture, vertical slice, DDD, CQRS, and modular monolith decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing whenever .NET tests or CI are switching from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), or an MTP migration behaves differently. Triggers include "switch from VSTest"; MSTest/NUnit/xUnit MTP enablement; OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props; EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner, or YTest.MTP.XUnit2; .NET 10 global.json test.runner and TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport; translating VSTest filters, logger, coverage, blame, or dump arguments; replacing VSTest@3; and exit code 8 or zero tests. Also use for xUnit v3 MTP filters during a v2-to-v3 upgrade. Do not use for framework conversion, TFM, UWP, or WinUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use MSTest. Use when a repo uses `MSTest.Sdk`, `MSTest`, `[TestClass]`, `[TestMethod]`, `DataRow`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based MSTest execution. USE FOR: the repo uses MSTest; you need to add, run, debug, or repair MSTest tests; the repo is moving between VSTest and Microsoft.Testing.Platform. DO NOT USE FOR: xUnit projects; TUnit projects. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Share state between components that don't have a direct parent-child parameter relationship, using cascading values, scoped services with change events, or CascadingValueSource via DI. USE WHEN the user needs a CascadingParameter or CascadingValue that works across render mode boundaries, a shopping cart or notification count accessible from multiple pages, a theme or user preference cascaded app-wide, or when components in different parts of the tree must react when shared data changes. Also USE WHEN cascading values aren't reaching interactive children in per-page interactivity mode, or when the user needs to understand scoped vs singleton service lifetime for state on Blazor Server. DO NOT USE for direct parent-child parameter passing or EventCallback (see author-component), for persisting state across prerender-to-interactive transitions (see support-prerendering), or for service abstractions for data fetching in Auto/WebAssembly (see fetch-and-send-data).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build cross-platform .NET applications with Uno Platform targeting WebAssembly, iOS, Android, macOS, Linux, and Windows from a single XAML/C# codebase. USE FOR: building cross-platform apps from a single C# and XAML codebase; targeting WebAssembly, iOS, Android, macOS, Linux, and Windows simultaneously; migrating WPF or UWP. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security log parsing, anomaly detection, SIEM query building, Sigma rule creation, and correlation rule development across Splunk, Elastic, QRadar, and Microsoft Sentinel

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reverse engineering tools are missing, not working, or need configuration. Installation guides for radare2 (r2), Ghidra, GDB, QEMU, Frida, binutils, and cross-compilation toolchains. Keywords - "install radare2", "setup ghidra", "r2 not found", "qemu missing", "tool not installed", "configure gdb", "cross-compiler"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a question across a corpus of contract documents with verified citations. Use when the user asks what a contract says, which contracts have a clause, what changed between amendments, or any question that needs reading and citing across a set of contract files. The corpus must be on the local filesystem (see README).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and audit privacy controls in product and infrastructure — GDPR, CCPA / CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA. Covers data minimization, lawful basis, consent management, data subject access requests (DSARs — access, deletion, portability), data processing agreements, DPIA / TIA, breach notification timing, data classification, and the technical implementation of 'right to be forgotten' across backups, caches, analytics, and third parties. Use when the user mentions 'GDPR,' 'CCPA,' 'CPRA,' 'data privacy,' 'privacy engineering,' 'data subject access request,' 'DSAR,' 'right to deletion,' 'right to be forgotten,' 'data portability,' 'consent management,' 'cookie consent,' 'data minimization,' 'DPIA,' 'data protection impact assessment,' 'breach notification,' 'BAA,' 'DPA,' 'data processing agreement,' 'sub-processor,' 'cross-border data transfer,' 'SCCs,' or needs to implement or review privacy controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traditional market microstructure concepts applied to crypto — order book dynamics, market making theory, price formation models, execution quality measurement, and CEX vs DEX structural differences

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEX orderflow analysis, trade classification, buyer/seller pressure, and microstructure signals for Solana tokens

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microscopy data management platform. Access images via Python, retrieve datasets, analyze pixels, manage ROIs/annotations, batch processing, for high-content screening and microscopy workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert PyTorch AT_DISPATCH macros to AT_DISPATCH_V2 format in ATen C++ code. Use when porting AT_DISPATCH_ALL_TYPES_AND*, AT_DISPATCH_FLOATING_TYPES*, or other dispatch macros to the new v2 API. For ATen kernel files, CUDA kernels, and native operator implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when crossing a Windows security boundary or escaping a sandbox — kernel/user crossing (win32k/dxgkrnl UAF CVE-2025-24983), BYOVD kernel R/W, UAC/COM elevation, AppContainer/LPAC & Chromium-Mojo sandbox escape (CVE-2025-2783), PPL bypass, RPC/ALPC & named-pipe impersonation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when attacking a Windows Active Directory domain — Kerberos roasting/delegation, coercion + NTLM/Kerberos relay (CVE-2025-33073), ADCS ESC1-16 (EKUwu), ticket forgery & DCSync, dMSA BadSuccessor (CVE-2025-53779), BloodHound attack-path enumeration, domain dominance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。