「sam」の検索結果

Design a sequence where students compare AI's handling of the same question across disciplines, developing a mental model of where AI is reliable vs. distorting based on knowledge type.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Returns the frozen gate constants — question, header, option labels and descriptions, digest field-list, and preview content — for every catalog gate. Invoked by the team lead fresh on arrival at each gate and on pulse re-emissions, in the same turn as the render. The transport contract, three renders, partition rule, and authoring rubric live in swarm:workflow-rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews HealthKit code for authorization patterns, query usage, background delivery, and data type handling. Use when reviewing code with import HealthKit, HKHealthStore, HKSampleQuery, HKObserverQuery, or HKQuantityType.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test kolu's remote-host features (multi-host / padi-remote) in a real browser against a real remote box — the ONLY full end-to-end harness for this surface (real ssh provision, no mock). Covers the isolated nix-run invocation (or just dev, which bakes the same agent source), ssh- provisioning a real remote box without touching production or another user's box, the chrome-devtools drive sequence for host-switch / split / code-browser / per-host-canvas, PID-exact teardown, and the reproduce- first rule for any bug the feature surfaces. Triggers on "test remote hosts", "test multi-host", "test padi-remote", "verify the host switch", "browser-test a remote host change", or before claiming a remote-host fix works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue real repository work between Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Grok Build with a privacy-bounded, drift-aware handoff packet. Use for cross-vendor takeover, context-limit checkpoints, multi-hop Claude→Codex→Grok relays, or receiving an existing Director packet. Use native resume commands for same-CLI history; never treat another vendor's session ID as portable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Belastbaren Produktmarketing-Kontext für Positionierung, Zielgruppen, Botschaften, Einwände und Nachweise erstellen, prüfen und aktualisieren. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn die gemeinsame Grundlage fehlt, auf die sich Texte, Content, Vergleiche und Kampagnen stützen sollen: ICP, Jobs-to-be-Done, Nutzenversprechen, Differenzierung, Preislogik, Einwandbehandlung und Belegklassen. Legt das Ergebnis als `.agents/product-marketing.md` im Projekt ab und kennzeichnet, was belegt, was Anbieterangabe und was Annahme ist. Ersetzt weder Kundenforschung noch Rechtsprüfung.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kundenforschung datensparsam und einwilligungsorientiert planen, durchführen und auswerten. Nutze diesen Skill für Interviewleitfäden, Umfragen, Usability-Tests, die Auswertung vorhandener Gespräche, Support-Tickets oder Bewertungen, und für Personas, Segmente und Jobs-to-be-Done. Klärt vorab Zweck, Rechtsgrundlage, Einwilligung, Aufzeichnung, Pseudonymisierung und Aufbewahrung, wertet nur innerhalb des Stichprobenrahmens aus und trennt Befund von Entscheidung. Beachtet DSGVO, BDSG und Beschäftigtendaten; Österreich und Schweiz werden getrennt behandelt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quellenbasierte Profile einzelner Wettbewerber aus öffentlichen Informationen erstellen. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn Positionierung, Zielgruppe, Produkt, Preise, Organisation und Belegbehauptungen eines Anbieters zusammengetragen werden sollen, als Kurzbrief, fokussiertes Profil oder vertiefte Recherche. Trennt Tatsache, Anbieterangabe, Schätzung und Hypothese in einem Claim-Ledger, hält Quellen mit Datum fest und beachtet Datenschutz, Datenbankrechte, Urheberrecht und Geschäftsgeheimnisse. Kein Scraping über das Freigegebene hinaus, keine Personendossiers. Für vergleichende Seiten: competitors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous, citation-backed desk market research: quick go/no-go market scans, market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), competitor analysis, customer demand signals, and trend/macro (PESTEL) analysis. Use this skill whenever the user wants to research, size, validate, or enter a market — "is there a market for…", "how big is the market for…", "who are the competitors of…", "should I build/launch/sell…", "validate this business idea", "market research for…", "market entry" — in any language and for any country's market (e.g. "nghiên cứu thị trường", "étude de marché", "市場調査", "análisis de mercado"), even when the user never says the words "market research". Also use it when another skill or workflow (strategy-board, design-thinking, a product brief) needs external market facts delivered into its fact base or research folder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as the team's Scrum Master of record, or copilot to a human one: plan sprints, run daily pulses, close sprints, prepare and follow up retrospectives, track and escalate impediments, and detect process anti-patterns across sprint history. Use whenever the user asks for Scrum or agile process help, in any language — "plan the sprint", "chuẩn bị retro", "how is the sprint going", "our velocity dropped", "track this blocker", "the same problem keeps coming back" — even without the word "Scrum", and whenever `_project/scrum-master/` exists and the question touches sprints, ceremonies, impediments, or team process health. Not for delivery dates and budget (project-manager) or deciding what to build (product-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs Fable 5 and OpenAI Codex as co-founders on the Rocket Fuel operating system. Fable is the Visionary (vision, plan, standards, final review); Codex is the Integrator (filters the plan, executes the build, reports). Context-routed, one entry point, four functions: KICKOFF a new project, CLARITY BREAK to refactor an existing one, SAME PAGE MEETING to pressure-test a plan, BUILD A ROCK to hand Codex a scoped task. Use when the user says /rocket-fuel, wants to start or refactor a project with Codex, wants a plan reviewed by a second model, or wants to delegate a build to Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HealthSim generates realistic synthetic healthcare data for testing EMR systems, claims processing, pharmacy benefits, and analytics. Use for ANY request involving: (1) synthetic patients, clinical data, or medical records, (2) healthcare claims, billing, or adjudication, (3) pharmacy prescriptions, formularies, or drug utilization, (4) HL7v2, FHIR, X12, or NCPDP formatted output, (5) healthcare testing scenarios or sample data generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when looking up library documentation, API references, framework patterns, or code examples for ANY library (React, Next.js, Vue, Django, Laravel, etc.) and the Context7 MCP server is unavailable or not configured. Fetches the same current docs directly via the Context7 REST API as a fallback. Triggers on: how to use library, API docs, framework pattern, import usage, library example.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and decode a pending Safe (multisig) governance batch from the Safe Transaction Service into a chain-tagged transactions JSON file that `/warp-route-check` (or any downstream consumer with the same input shape) ingests. Safe-API integration only — no forks, no replay, no simulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements the Outbox pattern for reliable domain event processing. Ensures events are persisted in the same transaction as the aggregate changes and processed asynchronously with guaranteed delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a "how do I …" question about the platform with a Gherkin scenario on @datagrok-libraries/bdd that is filmed into a how-to video (grok-bdd guide), so the answer is demonstrated, sent as a video plus numbered steps, and kept as a regression test; the same scenarios, filmed in help mode, are the GIFs of the help pages

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measurement techniques for identifying composition, microstructure, and properties of engineering materials — optical and electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, EDS and WDS spectroscopy, thermal analysis, mechanical testing, and fractography. Covers when to use which technique, sample-preparation pitfalls, and how to build a characterization plan that answers a specific engineering question rather than accumulating data for its own sake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Field observation, data collection, and research methods for geographic inquiry. Covers site selection and sampling strategies, field observation techniques (landscape reading, transects, quadrats), survey and interview methods for human geography, GPS and field mapping, environmental monitoring and instrumentation, data recording and field notebooks, ethical considerations in fieldwork, and the integration of field data with GIS analysis. Use when planning geographic field research, designing data collection protocols, evaluating field evidence, or connecting field observations to broader geographic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。