sr:plan
無料Phase 4 of the SRS workflow. Reads spec.md and writes one detailed plan file per SRS section (§1–§3 + Appendices). Each file is a complete blueprint for the corresponding SRS section. No word limit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,075 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Phase 4 of the SRS workflow. Reads spec.md and writes one detailed plan file per SRS section (§1–§3 + Appendices). Each file is a complete blueprint for the corresponding SRS section. No word limit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 6 of the SRS workflow. Reads approved plan files and generates a complete IEEE 830-compliant SRS — one file per section, no word limit. A full SRS may span 300+ pages across all files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions, validate web functionality, or perform any browser-based testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 6 of the SRS workflow. Reads approved plan files and generates a complete IEEE 830-compliant SRS — one file per section, no word limit. A full SRS may span 300+ pages across all files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 of the SRS workflow. Reads spec.md and writes one detailed plan file per SRS section (§1–§3 + Appendices). Each file is a complete blueprint for the corresponding SRS section. No word limit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Always use this skill before claiming any work is done, fixed, passing, or complete — even if it seems obvious. Also use when receiving code review feedback from any source (human or automated), when finishing a task or major feature, before committing or creating a PR, or when about to express satisfaction with work. Covers three practices: receiving feedback with technical rigor (no performative agreement), triggering code review via /code-review command or cook/fix pipelines, and verification gates (run the command, read the output, then make the claim). Never skip — the cost of false completion claims is higher than the cost of verifying. References: code-review-reception.md, requesting-code-review.md, verification-before-completion.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring Slack-specific Agentforce capabilities AFTER the basic Slack deployment is complete: enabling Slack-native actions, managing public vs. private action scope, mapping Salesforce-to-Slack user identity, or troubleshooting Slack action failures. Triggers: 'add General Slack Actions topic to agent', 'configure canvas creation for Agentforce in Slack', 'Agentforce private action requires user identity mapping', 'Slack agent cannot send DMs after deployment', 'Agentforce Look Up User action not working in Slack', 'how to map Slack users to Salesforce identities for private actions'. NOT for the initial Slack OAuth install, DM vs channel-mention mode, or core agent setup — use agentforce/agent-channel-deployment. NOT for sending a Slack message or creating a channel from a Flow — use flow/flow-for-slack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automating post-sandbox-refresh cleanup via the `SandboxPostCopy` interface — the Apex class that runs ONCE after a sandbox refresh or clone completes, before users can log in. Used to mask emails, deactivate users, scrub integration endpoints, disable scheduled jobs, and reapply per-environment configuration the metadata copy doesn't carry. Covers the interface contract (`runApexClass` setting, `SandboxContext` parameter, single-execution semantics), the email-masking pattern that stops sandbox tests emailing production addresses, and the refresh runbook checklist. NOT for choosing sandbox type or refresh cadence — use admin/sandbox-strategy. NOT for re-seeding reference data after a refresh — use data/sandbox-refresh-data-strategies. Trigger keywords: SandboxPostCopy, runApexClass, SandboxContext, Test.testSandboxPostCopyScript, RunAsAutoProcUser, Automated Process user, CronTrigger, System.abortJob, sandbox email masking, post-refresh runbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to design, configure, and troubleshoot Salesforce Entitlement Management on Cases: entitlement processes, milestone definitions, recurrence types, milestone actions (success/warning/violation), business hours assignment, and entitlement templates. Covers the deployable EntitlementProcess / MilestoneType / EntitlementTemplate / EntitlementSettings metadata, signed timeLength time triggers, recurrenceType semantics, process versioning, and how a milestone actually completes. Trigger keywords: entitlement process, milestone, SLA timer, milestone tracker, first response SLA, time trigger, recursChained, CaseMilestone, EntitlementId, SlaProcess, stopped clock. NOT for SLA milestones on Field Service work orders — use admin/fsl-sla-configuration-requirements. NOT for time-based case escalation rules — use admin/escalation-rules. NOT for the business-hours calendar itself — use admin/business-hours-and-holidays.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects missing or incomplete PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy privacy manifest files, enforcing Guideline 5.1 and Apple's required-reason API declaration policy enforced from May 1, 2024.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the project's verification harness (analyze, lint, format, tests) after code changes. Use after editing Dart code to verify the change before declaring it complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing a TDD step and wanting a quality check. Reviews test quality after RED, implementation correctness after GREEN, and scenario completeness after REFACTOR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete fullstack development mastery covering modern web architectures, automation tools, AI integration, and production deployment practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete guide to Japanese Language Proficiency Test preparation with strategies for vocabulary, kanji, grammar, reading, and listening across all levels
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a drafted support response for quality, accuracy, tone, and completeness before sending.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete Hindsight documentation for AI agents. Use this to learn about Hindsight architecture, APIs, configuration, and best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for contributing new skills to the skills-x collection. This skill should be used when users want to add new open-source skills from external sources (like agentskills.io or anthropics/skills) to the skills-x repository. It covers the complete workflow from discovery to publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute the tasks from an already-created feature plan in .unikit/code/plans/ — read the plan manifest (the PLAN.md file in the plan folder), work through the uncompleted tasks in order, write the code, mark progress, and resume across sessions. Supports selective runs by phase or by task numbers, and continuing from where the last session stopped. Use whenever a plan exists and the user wants to build it, e.g. "implement", "implement the plan", "start coding", "execute the plan", "run the plan", "do the next task", "implement phase 3", "implement tasks 2.1 and 2.3", "continue implementation", "continue where we left off", "keep going on the feature". To create the plan first, use the planning skill — this one carries an existing plan out.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。