3,797 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Clarify ambiguous requirements through focused dialogue before implementation. Use when requirements are unclear, features are complex (>2 days), or involve cross-team coordination. Ask two core questions - Why? (YAGNI check) and Simpler? (KISS check) - to ensure clarity before coding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade Three.js games from prototype visuals to premium browser graphics: art-direction critique, procedural model building, material and texture libraries, world prop kits, shaders, VFX, lighting and render pipeline, LOD and instancing, render budgets, and a 10-category visual scorecard. Use when screenshots still look basic or the user asks for premium, AAA, high-fidelity, showcase, or less-basic graphics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and iterate playable Three.js game systems: starter scaffold, architecture, design briefs, core loops, level and encounter design, entities, input, camera, collision and physics, scoring, objectives, and game feel. Use for first playable slices, new Vite/TypeScript/Three.js setups, level/arena/track/wave/hole/puzzle design, combat encounters, difficulty tuning, and juice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a website with traffic it under-converts to a research-driven growth engine that captures more leads, persuades more buyers, sells a sharper offer, and earns referrals. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, hundred-million-offers, contagious, one-page-marketing - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, OFFER.md, MARKETING.md, GROW-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a site that already has traffic, capture more leads, sharpen a weak offer, add referral loops, or says 'my site gets visitors but nobody buys'. If a broken funnel or usability friction is the real blocker, run improve-website first; if there is no site yet, use create-website; for one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize web performance through network protocols, resource loading, and browser rendering internals. Use when the user mentions "my site is slow", "Core Web Vitals", "HTTP/2 or HTTP/3", "resource hints", "network latency", "render blocking", "TCP/TLS optimization", "service worker", "Cache-Control or caching strategy", or "critical rendering path". Also trigger when diagnosing slow page loads, optimizing time to first byte, choosing between WebSocket and SSE, or reducing bundle sizes. For UI visual performance, see refactoring-ui. For font loading, see web-typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a blank page to a live, high-converting website, built message-first, then design, then conversion. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - one-page-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, top-design, web-typography, refactoring-ui, ux-heuristics, cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (POSITIONING.md, WEBSITE.md, CREATE-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new website or landing page from scratch, turn a validated idea into a page that converts, or says 'build me a landing page for my SaaS'. Site already exists: use improve-website site-wide, conversion-optimization for one flow, or grow-website for traffic; building a software product, not a marketing site: create-app; no positioning yet: create-business first, or the positioning phase here. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates passage-level citability, Q&A formatting, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-lifecycle blog engine with 31 sub-skills, 12 content templates, 5-category 100-point scoring, and 5 specialized agents. Routes user requests to the right sub-skill: writing, rewriting, analysis, outlines, audits, schema, charts, images, repurposing, AI citation SEO, FLOW framework prompts, topic-cluster execution, and multilingual publishing. Optimized for Google rankings around the May 2026 Core Update, E-E-A-T, and AI citations as one SEO discipline. Supports any platform (WordPress, Next.js MDX, Hugo, Ghost, Astro, Jekyll, 11ty, Gatsby, HTML). Use when user says "blog", "write a blog", "blog post", "blog strategy", "content brief", "editorial calendar", "blog audit", "blog optimization", "topic cluster", "multilingual blog", "FLOW framework", or any /blog subcommand. Sub-skill descriptions cover narrower triggers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit one blog post file for AI-citation readiness (self-contained, sourced passages, entity clarity, structure, crawler access) and score it with an internal 0-100 heuristic plus per-surface notes for AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot. Use when the user says "geo", "aeo", "ai citation", "citation audit", "chatgpt citation". Not for a site-wide audit, live AI-visibility tracking, or schema generation (use claude-seo seo-geo, blog-audit, blog-schema), and not a promise of citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports a free local mode (file analysis) and a paid DataForSEO API mode that runs only after the user approves the call count. Outputs a severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when the user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages". Not a site audit (blog-audit) or cluster planning (blog-cluster); it changes no files or redirects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrite and optimize existing blog posts for Google SEO (May 2026 Core Update, E-E-A-T) and AI citation visibility as one SEO discipline. For AI-citation-only audit (no Google work), use blog-geo instead. Replaces fabricated statistics with sourced data, applies answer-first formatting, adds images, generates SVG charts, and updates modified dates only for substantive changes. Works with any blog format (MDX, markdown, HTML). Use when user says "rewrite blog", "optimize blog", "update blog", "improve blog", "fix blog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED and marks a claim verified only when this run fetched the source and found the passage. Checks that a source says what the post says it says; it cannot prove the source is true or verify first-hand experience. Use when the user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "factcheck". Report only; not for rewriting posts (blog-rewrite).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strip the machine fingerprint out of any draft - em dashes, AI slop words, invisible watermark characters - and score it against a five-check detection panel before it goes out. Use whenever text needs to sound human, when the user says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", "will this get flagged", or before any LinkedIn post, comment, reply or DM is shown to the user.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg blocks, WP core checkouts) and you need to quickly classify the repo and route to the correct workflow/skill (blocks, theme.json, REST API, WP-CLI, performance, security, testing, release packaging).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need a deterministic inspection of a WordPress repository (plugin/theme/block theme/WP core/Gutenberg/full site) including tooling/tests/version hints, and a structured JSON report to guide workflows and guardrails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web testing with Playwright, Vitest, k6. E2E/unit/integration/load/security/visual/a11y testing. Use for test automation, flakiness, Core Web Vitals, mobile gestures, cross-browser.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds questions and assessments that measure what they claim — matching item type to the thing being assessed, writing distractors that diagnose, and telling a question that measures learning from one that measures reading speed or test-taking. Use this to write or review assessment items, design a unit check or diagnostic, work out why scores do not match classroom performance, or decide how much evidence a claim about mastery actually needs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judges whether material for children under six is developmentally plausible — what is typical at each age, why pre-K is not a thinner kindergarten, and which frameworks apply where Common Core does not. Use this to design or review pre-K material, decide whether a task is reasonable for an age, choose the right framework for a pre-K alignment claim, or push back on material that pushes school-age expectations downward.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。