「existing」の検索結果

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or resume an evidence-based RPI implementation plan with an optional independent critique. Use when a task needs an implementation plan or an existing plan needs revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model and document existing or planned software architectures with the C4 model across System Context, Container, and Component levels plus deployment diagrams, then emit diagrams through a selected renderer. Use when an architect needs audience-appropriate software architecture documentation; use the 'architecture-diagrams' skill for infrastructure topology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and lint the title and thumbnail for a YouTube video as one pairing, checking truncation, duplication and vagueness before publish. Use for "title ideas", "what should I call this", "thumbnail text", "my CTR is bad", packaging, or any request to rename or repackage an existing video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests); use `write-code-eval`. To validate an existing judge, use `validate-evaluator`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a website and create a HyperFrames video from it. Use when: (1) a user provides a URL and wants a video, (2) someone says "capture this site", "turn this into a video", "make a promo from my site", (3) the user wants a social ad, product tour, or any video based on an existing website, (4) the user shares a link and asks for any kind of video content. Even if the user just pastes a URL — this is the skill to use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, write, time, style, and validate motion-graphic beats for long-form talking-head HyperFrames videos. Use when Codex is asked to add or improve visual beats, glassmorphism lower thirds, crumpled-paper full-screen takeovers, transcript-synced callouts, pacing coverage, YouTube retention graphics, or render-ready overlays in an existing HyperFrames video project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the existing May Shorts teaching compositions using their legacy face-mode, scene-overlay, and karaoke-caption patterns. Use only when working on those examples or explicitly requesting this legacy scaffold. For new reels, Shorts, or short advertisements, use short-form-edit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /audit on a greenfield project, an existing codebase with missing docs, or one area (/audit src/auth) to bootstrap the project's AI context, the AGENTS.md files every later skill reads. Writes tool agnostic AGENTS.md plus thin CLAUDE.md pointers, adding only what is missing; never overwrites curated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improves an existing application using its code, product contract, authorized work history and competitor evidence. Use for 取长补短、取其精华去其糟粕、参考竞品优化应用 or evolving an app from successful and failed work. Carries authorized changes through implementation and user-result verification, including REA and reverse Skill composition; use skill-evolver for Skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches and improves a specified existing Skill using successful/failed work and competitor evidence. Use for 优化这个Skill, 从成功和失败经验改进Skill, or 研究竞品后优化指定技能. Routine creation and editing use skill-creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch existing YouTube transcripts/subtitles or archive spoken video content as text, and download YouTube videos/audio or HLS streams (m3u8) with yt-dlp and ffmpeg. Use for transcript/subtitle retrieval, text-first video archiving, video/audio downloads, protected streams with authentication headers, and download failures including nsig, 403 or browser-cookie issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms raw meeting transcripts into structured, evidence-based meeting minutes — merges multiple versions without losing content, reviews existing minutes against the transcript for missing items, and identifies anonymous speakers (Speaker 1/2/3, 发言人1). Triggers on 会议纪要, 会议记录, 整理纪要, 妙记转纪要, "write meeting minutes", "merge these minutes". Not for fixing ASR/STT errors first (use transcript-fixer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces Word (.docx) and exports existing Word/WPS manuscripts to PDF, preserving revisions, tables and images, especially Chinese formal documents via a verified OpenXML generator with mandatory visual verification. Use for 生成 Word 文档 / 写合同 docx / 把 markdown 转成 Word / 中文排版. Not for Markdown → PDF (use daymade-docs:pdf-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two pipelines ending at a scanner-look PDF. (1) Phone photos of paper documents (contracts, stamped certificates, receipts, forms, handwritten notes) → clean scanner-quality PDF: perspective rectification + noteshrink whitening + A4 assembly + mandatory whole-document check. Trigger: "把照片 做成扫描件", "photos to scanned PDF", "make this look scanned", "手机拍的 文档转 PDF", "盖章文件扫描", replacing pages in an existing scanned PDF, any CamScanner-like request. (2) A digital document with no signature yet (rendered docx/PDF, confirmation form, contract draft) → make it look hand-signed and scanned: synthesize a handwriting-style signature, composite it onto the signature line, apply the same scan-look post-processing. Trigger: "帮我做个手写签名", "生成签名盖到这份文件上", "做成签过字的扫描件", "synthesize a signature", any request for a document that needs to look signed without a real photographed signature. Do NOT hand-roll levels/contrast enhancement for scan-look — tried and rejected twice; this skill's pipeline is the proven one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch-generate and compare visual design directions so a user can choose the style they actually want. Use when the user says they cannot describe an abstract visual style, asks for many style options, wants to choose from generated UI/design-system images, rejects outputs as too colorful/too dead/too generic, or needs an existing UI/design system evolved without discarding current assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Places existing images onto an Excalidraw whiteboard, turns a slide deck into clean per-slide images, and inspects a .excalidraw file. Use whenever someone mentions Excalidraw, a whiteboard/canvas, .excalidraw, 白板 or 画板 — e.g. "put these screenshots on my board" — or a workshop delivered by hand-drawing over screenshots on a shared canvas. Not for generating a diagram from a text description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Co-creates a personal investment-research LLM Wiki (Karpathy's pattern) by interviewing the user for THEIR OWN analysis framework, not a template — a living CLAUDE.md of pure markdown + wikilinks, no RAG in place of compilation. Use to build a compounding 投研第二大脑 / 投研知识库 / 个人投研 wiki, ingest research reports / earnings calls into an existing wiki, or run post-earnings prediction→fulfillment reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a brand's visual and verbal identity into an applicable guideline kit — tokens, voice rules, and do/don't pairs — then apply it consistently to any artifact. Use when asked to apply brand guidelines to a document/deck/page, to extract a brand kit from existing materials or a website, to keep AI-produced artifacts on-brand, or to write lightweight brand guidelines for a startup. Produces a compact brand kit (visual tokens + voice rules + application examples) and/or an artifact restyled to it. For a creator's personal voice use creator-brand-kit; for building new UI systems use frontend-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign seat-based pricing for the agent era — when one human runs ten agents, per-seat models collapse. Use when agents are eroding seat counts, when asked to migrate to usage- or outcome-based pricing, to price an agent/API tier, or to defend revenue as customers automate their own usage. Produces a pricing migration plan: the new value metric, fences, agent-tier design, cannibalisation math, and a phased migration for existing customers. For general pricing and packaging strategy use pricing-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility entry point for React-library work in Octane; routes existing-binding maintenance to update-bindings and actual React implementation ports to octane-react-library-port.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit one, several, or all existing Octane bindings; implement selected maintenance findings or remove redundant copied files with evidence matched to source ownership. Use for binding updates, lifecycle fixes, dependency or metadata maintenance, and convenience-import requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a change small and in the existing idiom - size the plan and weigh smaller alternatives before writing it, reuse the mechanism that already owns the behavior instead of adding a parallel one, and simplify the diff before handoff. Use when planning any change beyond a few lines, before readying a PR, or when reviewing agent-written code for bloat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。