2,365 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 5: Prove. Success validation against Phase R baseline metrics, test log review, and AI justification validation. Use after deployment. Triggers on "prove", "phase 5", "validate", "did it work", "success criteria", "measure results", or after go-live.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 3: Investigate. Process mapping for existing or greenfield processes, user journey mapping, UX discovery, project goals, system architecture (integration map + data flow). Use after outcome alignment. Triggers on "investigate", "phase 3", "map the process", "process mapping", "user journey", "as-is process", or after Phase R exit checklist is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 1: Clarify. Problem definition, eliciting, painkiller test, buy vs build, AI justification gate, Go/No-Go. Use at the start of any AI implementation project. Triggers on "clarify", "phase 1", "start discovery", "define the problem", "what problem are we solving", or at the beginning of a new client engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a tdmcp TouchDesigner-bridge vertical slice the house way — promote an op from /api/exec to a first-class REST endpoint (e.g. POST /api/connect, GET /api/logs, node_detail flags), add its typed method in src/td-client/touchDesignerClient.ts, its Zod envelope in src/td-client/validators.ts, rewire the tool(s) to prefer the endpoint with an exec fallback, and write py_compile + td/tests unittest + offline msw client tests. Use when adding/changing a bridge REST endpoint, editing td/, extending node_detail/get_bridge_logs, promoting connect/disconnect/param-modes/DAT-text off exec, or doing any exec→REST work — especially the td-depth bridge-robustness backlog. Honors probe-live discipline when TouchDesigner is offline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verification methodology and gate checklist for the tdmcp Connectors Directory submission — run the docs build, build and inspect the .mcpb bundle, sweep for stale .dxt references, and cross-check the form-answer draft against the real requirements. Use to validate the submission package before a human submits, by executing commands and quoting evidence, not by trusting that work was done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use weekly to find and ship one new automation. Walks the 3Ms interview — Mindset (find the candidate) → Method (scope one) → Machine (build it). Trigger on "let's level up", "what should I automate next", "find me leverage this week", or as a Friday ritual. One run = one shipped artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nature-style engineering manuscript reviewer skill for testing devices, robots, platforms, systems, algorithms embodied in physical systems and engineering methods against requirements, validation, benchmarking, uncertainty, robustness and failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging methods, log analysis, and performance diagnostics. Use when debugging issues, analyzing errors, or troubleshooting incidents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing strategies and methodologies including TDD and E2E testing. Use when writing tests, implementing TDD workflow, or setting up E2E test infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants Codex to build, refine, test, or validate a CLI-Anything harness for a GUI application or source repository. Adapts the CLI-Anything methodology to Codex without changing the generated Python harness format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the theories/methodologies a project claims to implement are faithfully operationalized — or name-dropped, partially built, distorted, or over-claimed. Source-grounds the load-bearing theories; tags the rest provisional. Run periodically alongside /framework-health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the needs of the people you're building or exploring for, independently of solutions, using Allen's User Needs Mapping methodology. Identifies underserved needs that feed into the Opportunity Solution Tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when facing a new problem to classify its domain (Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, Confused) and select appropriate methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用两种系统化方法实现创新：重组式创新（向外收集元素并重新组合）和突变式创新（向内拆解并修改已有结构）。所有创新必须同时满足三要素：新元素+价值增量+可实现性。适用于需要突破现有框架、寻找新产品/新方案、或解决"创新靠碰运气"问题的场景。不适用于纯执行性的优化改进（那不需要新元素）。关键触发信号："需要新想法"、"怎么创新"、"创意枯竭"、"产品同质化严重"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect live Python class instances in a running process — find all instances of a class, examine their attributes/state, or invoke methods on them. Also supports forcing GC. Use this when you need to probe object-level runtime state beyond what watch/getglobal can provide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Display input/output args, return object and cost time of a Python method invocation in a live process. Use this to observe function behavior at runtime — see what arguments go in, what comes back, and how long it takes. This is the most frequently used diagnostic command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace execution time of Python method invocations in a live process with call stack visualization. Use this to see a hierarchical call tree showing which sub-calls are slow and where time is spent within a function.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, reverse-engineer, or update living feature specs following the spec-anchored methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer-only. Use when re-vendoring vendor-skills/BMAD/ against a newer BMAD-METHOD commit — "update BMAD", "re-vendor BMAD", "bump the BMAD pin". Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a product concept with Amazon's Working Backwards method: write the press release for the finished product first, then answer hard customer and stakeholder questions, ending in a complete PRFAQ document. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculates required credit enhancement levels with loss modeling, attachment/detachment points, and rating agency methodology. Use when sizing credit enhancement, modeling loss scenarios, or determining tranche subordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structures secondary direct transactions with pricing methodology, transfer restriction analysis, and ROFR navigation. Use when modeling secondary purchases, pricing founder/employee shares, or structuring tender offers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。